Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica 2009/69http://hdl.handle.net/11089/117442024-03-29T16:00:58Z2024-03-29T16:00:58ZPomocniczość jako zasada udziału podmiotów niepublicznych w realizacji zadań administracji publicznejWilczyński, Przemysławhttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/118402021-08-02T09:06:48Z2009-01-01T00:00:00ZPomocniczość jako zasada udziału podmiotów niepublicznych w realizacji zadań administracji publicznej
Wilczyński, Przemysław
The presence of non-public entities in the domain of public administration, to this day, has not been supported by either a coherent concept within the theory of law for the participation of non-public entities in the undertakings of public administration or in consistent legal solutions devised with such participation in mind. However, since 1997 this presence has been enjoying its constitutional backing in the subsidiarity principle in the Preamble to the Constitution. The subsidiarity principle, perceived as a moral principle, or the foundation for building the rules of public governance, or a legal principle, dictates mutual relations between individuals and various forms of public life. By influencing the shape of public administration, among other things, it also defines the position of non-public entities towards state organs in a broad sense, and towards other non-public entities operating under the legal governance of the state. It can also be seen as the rule implying the participation of non-public entities in the undertakings of public administration. Dissertations in this paper focus on subsidiarity – that is the basis and the principle of participation of non-public entities in the undertakings of public administration.
2009-01-01T00:00:00ZAdministracja publiczna jako wyznacznik sprawy z zakresu administracji publicznejWilczyńska, Agnieszkahttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/118252018-02-01T11:19:21Z2009-01-01T00:00:00ZAdministracja publiczna jako wyznacznik sprawy z zakresu administracji publicznej
Wilczyńska, Agnieszka
In efforts to establish the criteria for identifying a case as that pertaining to public administration (a key issue for delineating the scope of cognition of administrative courts), apart from the analysis of legal relation upon which the case is based, or criteria of the court assigned for a given cognition, it appears necessary to relate to the phenomenon of public administration. Adopting the assumption that one of the features of the term: “public administration case” (not only in semantic approach) is the phenomenon concerned with public administration itself, necessitates rather unambiguous understanding of such administration. To this end, it appears necessary to analyse both the meaning and the scope of the term: “public administration”. The ambiguity of this term within normative, judicatural and doctrinal realms would prevent public administration from being a priori a definitive criterion for identifying a case as that belonging to public administration domain. This paper includes the analysis of an objective and subjective approach to public administration. Within the context of discovering one of the determinants for a public administration case, these dissertations also tackle the issues concerning the criteria and the scope of public administration.
2009-01-01T00:00:00ZPrawo do obywatelstwa jako prawo człowiekaPołatyńska, Joannahttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/118022021-07-21T07:04:41Z2009-01-01T00:00:00ZPrawo do obywatelstwa jako prawo człowieka
Połatyńska, Joanna
The right to nationality is embodied in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) as one of the Human Rights granted to every human being.
Although it was consequently included in several international documents, is considered to be still more like a directive of conduct for States than a legally admissible claim of an individual. By custom, it is the right of each State to determine who its nationals are. The source of that ambiguity could be found in controversies arising from the dual nature of nationality, as a legal bond between a State and an individual, recognized both in public international law and domestic law of every State.
2009-01-01T00:00:00ZDobro wspólne jako kategoria normatywnaMłynarska-Sobaczewska, Annahttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/118012018-02-01T11:19:26Z2009-01-01T00:00:00ZDobro wspólne jako kategoria normatywna
Młynarska-Sobaczewska, Anna
The term “common good”, understood as the good shared by all the society (community), is well known in ancient and modern philosophy and in theory of politics, but very seldom is directly articled in law documents. This idea of common good has few senses described in the article: aggregative, common, suppressive, and integral. Always, however, the idea has been connected with doctrine of natural law. The term “common good” has also normative sense. This article compares the senses of Irish and Polish Constitutions, both of them use this idea in normative texts. Analysis of Polish Constitutional Tribunal decisions leads to conclusion that the sense of common good in Polish practice is not clear and has very weak association with doctrine (of natural law).
2009-01-01T00:00:00Z