<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Analyses/Rereadings/Theories Journal (2015), vol. 3 nr 2</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/21534" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/21534</id>
<updated>2026-04-04T22:46:04Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-04T22:46:04Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>The American Dream and American Greed in Fanny Fern’s Ruth Hall: Sentimental and Satirical Christian Discourse in the Popular Domestic Tale</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/21922" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Van Nyhuis, Alison</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/21922</id>
<updated>2018-02-01T11:21:29Z</updated>
<published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The American Dream and American Greed in Fanny Fern’s Ruth Hall: Sentimental and Satirical Christian Discourse in the Popular Domestic Tale
Van Nyhuis, Alison
Although Fanny Fern’s Ruth Hall: A Domestic Tale of the Present Time originally was a widely&#13;
popular book in the nineteenth century, Fern and Ruth Hall were criticized after readers&#13;
learned about the similarities among Fern’s life and book. Contemporary critics have&#13;
recovered Ruth Hall from the literary margins and situated Ruth’s story in the context of the&#13;
popular American dream story while emphasizing the book’s satirical elements. Reexamining&#13;
the novel’s originally popular sentimental elements alongside the novel’s more recently&#13;
popular satirical elements expands the literary critical focus from Ruth’s sentimental&#13;
struggles and Fern’s satirical accomplishments to Ruth Hall’s equally important critique of&#13;
American greed, especially among wealthy and socially-conscious Christians.
</summary>
<dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Laying Bare: Agamben, Chandler, and The Responsibility to Protect</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/21921" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Quigley, Gabriel</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/21921</id>
<updated>2018-02-01T11:21:28Z</updated>
<published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Laying Bare: Agamben, Chandler, and The Responsibility to Protect
Quigley, Gabriel
This paper demonstrates the hidden similarities between Raymond Chandler’s prototypical&#13;
noir The Big Sleep, and the United Nations Responsibility to Protect (R2P) document. By taking&#13;
up the work of philosopher Giorgio Agamben, this paper shows that the bare life produces the&#13;
form of protection embodied by Philip Marlowe in Chandler’s novel and by the United Nations&#13;
Security Council in R2P. Agamben’s theorizing of the extra-legal status of the sovereign&#13;
pertains to both texts, in which the protector exists outside of the law. Philip Marlowe, tasked&#13;
with preventing the distribution of pornographic images, commits breaking-and-entering,&#13;
withholding evidence, and murder. Analogously, R2P advocates for the Security Council’s&#13;
ability to trespass laws that safeguard national sovereignty in order to prevent “bare”&#13;
atrocities against human life. As Agamben demonstrates, the extra-legal position of the&#13;
protector is made possible by “stripping bare” human life. This paper also gestures towards&#13;
limitations of Agamben’s thought by indicating, through a comparison of these two texts, that&#13;
bare life produces states of exception as the object of protection rather than punishment.
</summary>
<dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Vision and Violence in Virginia Woolf’s The Waves</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/21801" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Otto, Peggy D.</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/21801</id>
<updated>2018-02-01T11:21:22Z</updated>
<published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Vision and Violence in Virginia Woolf’s The Waves
Otto, Peggy D.
Virginia Woolf describes her artistic goal in The Waves as an attempt to create “an abstract&#13;
mystical eyeless book.” Yet, in creating her eyeless book, one that eschews a single narrative&#13;
perspective, Woolf amasses abundant visual details. For each of her six characters, visual&#13;
images mark significant moments of being. In fact, Woolf emphasizes the characters’ capacity&#13;
for sight as a vulnerability that allows them to be violated and wounded over and over. This&#13;
article analyzes connections between visual imagery and themes of violence in the novel to&#13;
demonstrate how they cohere into an extended metaphor for the ways in which acts of&#13;
looking can elicit powerful emotions that threaten to fragment individual identity in painful&#13;
ways. While Woolf’s novel has received critical commentary that focuses on the role of vision&#13;
in the narrative and critics have also noted how violence in the text supports other themes,&#13;
the explicit relationship between sight and violence has not yet been fully explored. A close&#13;
examination of the visual imagery in key scenes of the novel demonstrates how Woolf engages&#13;
the reader to participate in the characters’ deepening sense of fragmentation as they are&#13;
repeatedly assaulted by experience, as the eyes themselves become symbols of the twin&#13;
dynamics of desire and destruction.
</summary>
<dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Towards a Non-hierarchical Space of Thought: Reading Roland Barthes’ The Neutral</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/21798" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Myk, Małgorzata</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/21798</id>
<updated>2021-07-19T12:09:44Z</updated>
<published>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Towards a Non-hierarchical Space of Thought: Reading Roland Barthes’ The Neutral
Myk, Małgorzata
The article is devoted to The Neutral: the 1977-1978 lecture course developed and taught by&#13;
Roland Barthes at the Collège de France. I argue that The Neutral is firmly rooted in the&#13;
tradition that Brian Massumi defined as “nomad thought” in his foreword to Gilles Deleuze&#13;
and Félix Guattari’s A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism &amp; Schizophrenia. The essay traces the&#13;
genealogy of this tradition and the term of the neutral, beginning with Maurice Blanchot’s&#13;
work and his own concept of the neutral and ending with Barthes’ so far largely unexplored&#13;
engagement with the texts of Deleuze. Elusive as the neutral figure is meant to remain, it&#13;
emerges as a theorist’s effort to exercise a form of non-dualistic and non-hierarchical thinking.
</summary>
<dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
