http://hdl.handle.net/11089/25529 2026-04-12T07:12:18Z 2026-04-12T07:12:18Z Bogucki, Krystian http://hdl.handle.net/11089/33787 2021-02-23T02:22:08Z 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z

Wittgenstein o rozjaśnianiu myśli. Wstęp do lektury traktatu logiczno-filozoficznego Bogucki, Krystian In this article I examine some remarks from Wittgenstein‘s Tractatus logico-philosophicus about the point and the method of his work. First part of the article concerns relationships between Frege‘s conception of elucidation and Wittgenstein‘s conception of philosophy. Second part of the article is about Wittgenstein‘s attitude to science and the role of science in philosophy. Third part of my article concerns the ethical purpose of Wittgenstein‘s Tractatus logico-philosophicus.

2018-01-01T00:00:00Z Węcławski, Michał http://hdl.handle.net/11089/33786 2021-02-23T02:22:14Z 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z

Eklektyzm jako postawa filozoficzna Węcławski, Michał The aim of this paper is to explore some of the meanings of frequently underestimated and misunderstood topic of eclecticism. In doing so, we would like to ask how the phenomenon of eclecticism was perceived in the past and whether it is correct to regard it as something more than just an abstract notion, namely: as a philosophical mindset and particular approach to life in general. The text is divided into two parts. The first one contains an outline of the history of eclecticism, understood as a notion and a kind of attitude. It is shown that, among others, it was thanks to the eclectic approach that emerging Christian civilisation would open itself to the heritage of the classical era; late antiquity and the Renaissance, both having produced ideas of religious humanism, are also indicated as the most eclecticism-related epochs. The second part aims at describing the phenomenon of eclecticism as, unlike syncretism, depending on a selection of elements rather than combining them together. It is presented as a way of philosophising and thus as a way of being, potentially creative and open to different viewpoints, yet, unlike skepticism, committed to the truth. All in all, the paper shall be perceived as a praise of eclecticism, assuming that it deserves far more appreciation and scholarly attention than has been given to it thus far.

2018-01-01T00:00:00Z Remisiewicz, Łukasz http://hdl.handle.net/11089/33785 2021-02-23T02:22:07Z 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z

Ocena trafności zarzutów przeciw ateizmowi semantycznemu Bohdana Chwedeńczuka Remisiewicz, Łukasz The article iś diverśe on two partś. In the firśt part, the author referś aśśumptionś of Bohdan Chweden czuk book, “Przekonania religijne” [Religiouś Beliefś] that waś devoted to juśtify the theśiś according to which religiouś śtatementś are meaningleśś. He emphaśiześ a role of śo called Hume Requirement that waś pośtulated aś a demarcation line between meaningful and meaningleśś wordś in Chweden czuk argumentation chain. Next he indicateś main objectionś againśt the Requirement which were conśidered by Chweden czuk. The śecond part of the article iś a diścuśśion with critiqueś that were emerging after publiśhing of “Przekonania”. Such philośopherś aś J. J. Jadacki, M. Przełęcki, K. Kondrat, M. Pawliśzyn, W. Wolan czyk and I. Ziemin śki formulated a number of argumentś againśt the theśiś about meaningleśśneśś of religiouś śtatementś. Author śhowś that Jadacki, Przełęcki and Ziemin śki preśented compelling argumentś which cannot be undermine baśing on the “Przekonania” text, thuś theśe objectionś muśt be included if the Chweden czuk’ś theory could be conśidered aś juśtified. Argumentś formulated by Kondrat and Wolan czyk are pośśible to refute and Pawliśzyn’ś critique iś pointleśś.

2018-01-01T00:00:00Z Mączka, Dorian http://hdl.handle.net/11089/33780 2021-02-23T02:22:12Z 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z

Amodernistyczna filozofia Paula Feyerabenda Mączka, Dorian Paul Feyerabend’s philosophy, mainly due to his radically pluralistic claims, may be regarded as an example of postmodern philosophy of science. At the same time Feyerabend’s thought contains some strictly modern ideas and noticing those ideas is important for proper reading of his works. In this paper, in order to properly understand this conceptual tension, I compare Feyerabend’s philosophy with Bruno Latour’s idea of amodernity. The first part of the paper presents modern and postmodern themes present in Feyerabend’s works. The second part elucidates the concept of amodernity expounded by Latour in the essay We have never been modern. In the third part I show that Feyerabend’s philosophy displays all of the most important features of amodern way of thinking (in Latour’s sense). In the final section I discuss how the interpretation of Feyerabend’s thought as an example of amodern philosophy may be fruitful in further research.

2018-01-01T00:00:00Z