<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris 21 (2/2013)</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/2671" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/2671</id>
<updated>2026-04-13T09:39:34Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-13T09:39:34Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Gramatyka „wierzyć” religijnego w kontekście gier językowych</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/35054" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Sękowski, Piotr M.</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/35054</id>
<updated>2021-04-09T01:21:45Z</updated>
<published>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Gramatyka „wierzyć” religijnego w kontekście gier językowych
Sękowski, Piotr M.
Wittgenstein’s philosophy of religion is not very well known in polish&#13;
philosophical literature. His conception of language-games is sometimes vague. The article presents the problem of faith and religion in&#13;
the context of Wittgenstein's language-games. The trouble with it is lack&#13;
of precise definition of language-game. Still, under certain conditions,&#13;
we can discuss faith and religion from the perspective of languagegames. It becomes possible to indicate a specific religious language&#13;
which could be treated as a language-game. Three components characteristic for language-games - some set of words (vocabulary), grammar,&#13;
and form of life (which is inseparably related to language-game) - could&#13;
be separated also for religious language. In the face of studies, faith appears as inseparably related to activity. That means that the believer is&#13;
pushed to specified activities, and we can't talk about faith without these activities. Faith is a "picture" which affects the lives of believers and&#13;
forms them.
</summary>
<dc:date>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>A Man is Free as He is the Image of Godly Freedom. Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Further Considerations about Freedom</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/35053" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Perkowska, Iwona Magdalena</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/35053</id>
<updated>2021-04-09T01:21:47Z</updated>
<published>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">A Man is Free as He is the Image of Godly Freedom. Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Further Considerations about Freedom
Perkowska, Iwona Magdalena
The article presents Fyodor Dostoevsky’s considerations of freedom&#13;
based on both The Brothers Karamazov and The Idiot. The writer shows,&#13;
that dealing with own freedom is one of the greatest tasks in human life&#13;
and man's future fate depends wholly on how he copes with this task.&#13;
Freedom is a fundamental concept in a philosophical anthropology of&#13;
the Russian novelist. According to his grasp of the problem of evil this is&#13;
a man, who appears the source of all misery, which he brings upon&#13;
himself, among which not atheism but false understanding of God is the&#13;
greatest one.
</summary>
<dc:date>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Tożsamość zakresowa treści nieadekwatnego pojęcia boga i pojęcia skończonego umysłu ludzkiego w filozofii Descartes’a</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/35052" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Śliwiński, Tomasz</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/35052</id>
<updated>2021-04-09T01:21:48Z</updated>
<published>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Tożsamość zakresowa treści nieadekwatnego pojęcia boga i pojęcia skończonego umysłu ludzkiego w filozofii Descartes’a
Śliwiński, Tomasz
In the conception of Descartes, the human mind is vested with the idea&#13;
of God held to be innate. This idea, being adapted to human cognitive&#13;
powers, must be limited, although it applies for the infinite being.&#13;
Therefore, it has to be inadequate still at the same time sufficient. The&#13;
idea represents God as the omniscient being who created the human&#13;
mind along with the knowledge which it is able to cognize. The idea of&#13;
God embodied in the mind of that kind is identical with knowledge,&#13;
which the mind may get to know when realizing thoroughly its true&#13;
nature. To the finite mind “God” is a collective concept for a reliable&#13;
knowledge of which he is the author and which he guarantees. The&#13;
innate ideas belonging to the nature of mind are the components of the&#13;
idea of God, which is the source of the deductive theory of knowledge.&#13;
Responding to a question of how the mind received this idea, we&#13;
provide thereby an answer to the question from where the mind&#13;
received itself, along with the contents adherent to it.
</summary>
<dc:date>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Definiowanie Boga w Księdze Rodzaju i doświadczanie absolutu</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/35051" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Paradowski, Ryszard</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/35051</id>
<updated>2021-04-09T01:21:46Z</updated>
<published>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Definiowanie Boga w Księdze Rodzaju i doświadczanie absolutu
Paradowski, Ryszard
The paper presents the philosophical interpretation of the Biblical story&#13;
on anthropogenesis, contained in the introductory chapters of the Book&#13;
of Genesis. The interpretation is developed on the base of the suggestion&#13;
got out from „Plato's dilemma” and author's concept of metaphysics. The&#13;
opinion about the relationship between philosophy and religion and the&#13;
complex structure of the notion of „god” and the contents of the „mystic&#13;
experience” is given.
</summary>
<dc:date>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
