http://hdl.handle.net/11089/34336 2026-04-12T19:02:00Z 2026-04-12T19:02:00Z Bogaczyk-Vormayr, Małgorzata http://hdl.handle.net/11089/38072 2021-07-22T01:16:29Z 2015-01-01T00:00:00Z

Zalety i pomyłki interdyscyplinarności. Krytyczna recenzja przyczynkiem do postulatu o publikacje interdyscyplinarne [Hermes Andreas Kick, Günter Dietz (Hg.): Frieden als Balance in Psychotherapie und politischem Handlungsraum. Prozessdynamische Perspektiven, Berlin: LIT-Verlag, 2013] Bogaczyk-Vormayr, Małgorzata

2015-01-01T00:00:00Z Kulesza, Kamila http://hdl.handle.net/11089/38071 2021-07-22T01:16:25Z 2015-01-01T00:00:00Z

Mit i literatura – antropologia literatury Northropa Frye’a [Northrop Frye, Anatomia krytyki, przeł. Monika Bokiniec, Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, 2012] Kulesza, Kamila

2015-01-01T00:00:00Z Cyzman, Marzenna http://hdl.handle.net/11089/38070 2021-07-22T01:16:28Z 2015-01-01T00:00:00Z

Filozofia zmiany — zmiana w filozofii? Uwagi o nie-dualizującej filozofii Josefa Mitterera Cyzman, Marzenna The present paper is aimed at a short presentation of the nondualizing way of speaking formulated by Josef Mitterer, the Austrian philosopher. In the first part I focus on metaphilosophical conception of the non-dualism which is assumed as alternative for the dualizing way of speaking (dominating not only in the philosophical discourses but also in ordinary acts of speech). According to the from-object-cognition (which is understood as the option for traditional epistemology directed towards the object), there is no distinction between object and description. Thus, in the non-dualizing way of speaking, one speaks from the object, not about the object. This is impossible to present the object without a rudimentary description. As a consequence, the discourses are directed towards the change, not toward the truth (which is understood as the aim of the dualizng discourses). In the second part of the paper there is a short critique of Mitterer’s analyses, especially the notion of contingency and the notion of description. Assuming that one can formulate any kind of description from the object, Mitterer reaches the idea of anything goes which is unacceptable also from constructivist point of view (S. Fish’s notions, especially institutional nesting, are used in order to provide more acceptable solution: our conceptions are always based on pre-understandings and conventions). The notion of description, the central point of Mitterer’s deliberations, is involved in dualizing and this seems not to be the best way to present the different way of speaking.

2015-01-01T00:00:00Z Rusek, Damian http://hdl.handle.net/11089/38069 2021-07-22T01:16:23Z 2015-01-01T00:00:00Z

Ewolucja religii w memetyce (dawkins, dennett). Teoria doboru kulturowego w wyjaśnianiu zjawisk powstania, rozwoju i ewolucji kultury Rusek, Damian Since ‘The Selfish Gene’ by Richard Dawkins was published the notion of evolving culture has become a matter of a growing concern which appears to be especially intriguing from the perspective of biology (R. Dawkins), psychology (R. Brodie) as well as philosophy (D. Dennett). The essence of Darwin’s project is a natural selection within the sphere of a natural science. From this standpoint, a human is considered to be an effect of an evolutionary development. In the memetics approach, a human being is perceived in a different manner. An unit of gene, which task is to pass on the information in a process of a natural selection, has been replaced by a notion of a meme that is an entirely new replicator which, as opposed to a gene, may be applied to the various environments, not only a biological one. The crucial factor that determines the uniqueness of every man would be culture. From this point of view, the transfer of culture, which is developing in a specific procedure, is emphasized. What can be included in the evolutionary processes in the vast area of culture? What is the discrepancy between the Dawkins’s biological position and the grounded on a philosophy of mind the position of Dennett? The above mentioned attitudes result in various definitions of meme as well as the further implications that result from these definitions. Does the Theory of Cultural Selection fully explain a matter of the origin and evolution of languages, societies and religions?

2015-01-01T00:00:00Z