http://hdl.handle.net/11089/34471 2026-04-12T19:02:09Z 2026-04-12T19:02:09Z Szmidt, Olga http://hdl.handle.net/11089/35938 2021-05-28T01:16:22Z 2014-01-01T00:00:00Z

Pstryczek w nos Kartezjusza [Katarzyna Gurczyńska-Sady, Człowiek jako słowo i ciało. W poszukiwaniu nowej koncepcji podmiotu, Kraków: Universitas, 2014] Szmidt, Olga

2014-01-01T00:00:00Z Kachniarz, Ilona http://hdl.handle.net/11089/35937 2021-05-28T01:16:16Z 2014-01-01T00:00:00Z

Jak płeć wpływa na sposób uprawiania badań? O kobietach (w) nauce [Aleksandra Derra, Kobiety (w) nauce. Problem płci we współczesnej filozofii nauki i w praktyce badawczej, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, 2013] Kachniarz, Ilona

2014-01-01T00:00:00Z Jastrzębski, Hubert Chlebowski, Szymon http://hdl.handle.net/11089/35936 2021-05-28T01:16:23Z 2014-01-01T00:00:00Z

Frege i Łukasiewicz o wartościach logicznych Jastrzębski, Hubert; Chlebowski, Szymon Our article regards the connections between the views on semantics of Gottlob Frege and Jan Łukasiewicz. We are especially focused on the problem of logical values and their ontological interpetation. The paper is composed of three parts. In the first section we point out the general tendencies in the reception of Frege’s logical theory in the Lvov-Warsaw Philosophical School. The second section is dedicated to Frege’s semantics, especially his analysis of sense and meaning of propositions. In the third section we reconstruct Łukasiewicz’s propositional semantics from the period when he was inspired by Frege’s semantics. We also critically examine the widespread opinion, according to which the ontological interpretation of logical values proposed by Łukasiewicz is entirely consistent with Frege’s concept.

2014-01-01T00:00:00Z Janaszczyk, Agata http://hdl.handle.net/11089/35935 2021-05-28T01:16:20Z 2014-01-01T00:00:00Z

Tetradowa teoria humoralna z perspektywy koncepcji idoli Francisa Bacona Janaszczyk, Agata Francis Bacon’s conception of idols is a sort of a reference point for showing the criticism of the tetrad humoral theory, which derives from ancient times and corresponds to Pre-Socratic philosophy and Aristotle’s philosophy. That theory was still dogmatic in 16th century medicine, while its elements were used until the end of Enlightenment, even though different ways of medical thinking were being formed. Bacon’s general characteristics of basic cognitive mistakes in science can, as it seems, be used in order to show their equivalents in the system humoral approach. This way of approaching the problem can be placed within the critical diagnosis of humors’ conception, and taken up — starting from The Renaissance, by medics themselves: iatrochemists, iatromathematicians, iatromechanics.

2014-01-01T00:00:00Z