<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica nr 208/2007</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/5871" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/5871</id>
<updated>2026-04-05T07:50:33Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-05T07:50:33Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Teoretyczne aspekty popytu na pieniądz</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/16742" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Alberciak, Paweł</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Kacprzyk, Andrzej</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/16742</id>
<updated>2021-06-29T10:03:04Z</updated>
<published>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Teoretyczne aspekty popytu na pieniądz
Alberciak, Paweł; Kacprzyk, Andrzej
The main problem this article attempts to solve is the question if there is a theoretical connection&#13;
in the analysis of money demand between the attitude represented by the quantity theory of&#13;
money and Keynes’s attitude. In this question context the attempt to make a function of liquidity&#13;
preference out of the equation of Cambridge school has been set. Stating that Keynes and his&#13;
successors modified the concepts of quantity theory of money deleting a presumption of stability&#13;
of national income does not diminish the importance of their contribution into the studies of&#13;
money demand.
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Stopień niezależności banku centralnego a inflacja</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/16719" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Andrzejewska, Ewa</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Burdziak, Adrian</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Kuchta, Zbigniew</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/16719</id>
<updated>2021-07-12T10:57:26Z</updated>
<published>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Stopień niezależności banku centralnego a inflacja
Andrzejewska, Ewa; Burdziak, Adrian; Kuchta, Zbigniew
he objective of the article is an analysis of influence of a degree of central bank independence&#13;
 on a rate of inflation. Inflation theories of dynamic inconsistency were developed e.g. by&#13;
 Kydland and Prescott [1977], Barro and Gordon [1983] and Rogoff [1985]. On the basis&#13;
 of mentioned theories higher degree of central bank independence may result in lower rate&#13;
 of inflation.&#13;
 The first part of the article presents theorical basis of analysed relationship and is based on&#13;
 articles by Rogoff [1985], Alesina and Summers [1993], Posen [1993] and Eijjfinger and de Hann&#13;
 [1996]. However, the theory does not conclusively indicate the direction of this influence. Hence,&#13;
 the aroused purpose was to verify whether an institutional forms of monetary policy influences the&#13;
 rate of inflation.&#13;
 The next part includes empirical research. The degree of central bank independence was described&#13;
 by qualitative measures, which as well as transformed rate of inflation were derived from&#13;
 articles by Grilli, Masciandaro, Tabellini [1991] and Cukierman, Webb, Neyapti [1992]. The&#13;
 relation was estimated with the use of a linear regression. Results suggest that the influence of the&#13;
 degree of central bank independence on the rate of inflation is negative. Research done by other&#13;
 authors confirm the hypothesis pointed out in the article, however further analyses are recommended. &#13;
Remove selected
Autorzy chcą serdecznie podziękować prof. S. Krajewskiemu, prof. dr. hab. E. Kwiatkowskiemu,&#13;
dr. A. Stępniak-Kucharskiej, dr. J. Pruskiemu oraz mgr. J. Kowalskiemu z Instytutu&#13;
Ekonomii Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego oraz prof. N. Łapińskiej-Sobczak z Instytutu Ekonometrii&#13;
i Statystyki UŁ za cenne uwagi zgłoszone podczas pracy nad tekstem.
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>„Miękkie” ograniczenia budżetowe jako instrument wspierania przedsiębiorstw</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/16638" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Stępniak-Kucharska, Anna</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/16638</id>
<updated>2018-02-01T11:20:20Z</updated>
<published>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">„Miękkie” ograniczenia budżetowe jako instrument wspierania przedsiębiorstw
Stępniak-Kucharska, Anna
The economic transition and the later worsening of the economic situation led to the worsening&#13;
of the financial situation of Polish firms. Since 1990, the state has taken the decision to use&#13;
“soft” budgeting (cancel debts) of enterprises twice. The first time took place in the early ‘90s. It&#13;
comprised resignation from collecting certain taxes, agreements with SSO and bank, judicial and&#13;
civil conciliation agreements. Writing off debts was applied for the second time in 2002. This time&#13;
only debts toward the state (taxes, duties and contributions) were cancelled. The aim of both this&#13;
tools were to help the firms to riddance their “bad” (excessive, impossible to the repayment) debts.&#13;
On purpose elaborations is the introduction of forms of the “soft” budgeting used by Polish firms&#13;
after the year 1990. In the elaboration legal conditionings and the course of action of tools debts&#13;
canceling of the beginning of 90-s and from the year 2002 will be presented. Besides, the test of&#13;
the legal estimation of the efficiency of these tools will be shown.
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Podejście nowej ekonomii keynesowskiej do polityki reguł (w świetle analizy reguły J. B. Taylora)</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/16637" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Paszyn, Kamila</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/16637</id>
<updated>2018-02-01T11:20:20Z</updated>
<published>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Podejście nowej ekonomii keynesowskiej do polityki reguł (w świetle analizy reguły J. B. Taylora)
Paszyn, Kamila
The paper examines Taylor rule as an example of active rules. This sort of rules reacts in&#13;
response to changes in economy (f.e. in rate of unemployment or price level). The first part of&#13;
paper presents evaluation of concepts about monetary policy and about the famous debate between&#13;
keynesizm and inonetarizm: disrections versus rules. This question is still considered and&#13;
developed by New Keynesian. New Keynesizm doesn’t advocate for pure discretions any more.&#13;
But there is some scepticizm about rules that can be applied successfully in a practical policymaking&#13;
enviroument. The Taylor rule gives possibility to unify in one some simply algebraical&#13;
rule two very important properties required from good policy: flexibility and credibility. At the&#13;
same time elasticity in applying rule in practice can result in difficulties in distinguishing between&#13;
policy “responsive” rule and “constrained discretion”. In the last section of paper Taylor rule is&#13;
analysed according to concepts o f New Keynesizm. Especially issues like neutrality of money and&#13;
the role of rational expectations in effectiveness of policy are considered. A new consensus model&#13;
is a prof how Taylor rule is important in modem economic theory.
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
