<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/22424">
<title>Annales. Etyka w życiu gospodarczym 2017, vol. 20 nr 2</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/22424</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/22595"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/22594"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/22593"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/22592"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-04-03T20:46:31Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/22595">
<title>Odpowiedzialność pracodawców wobec rodzin pracowników (na podstawie badań empirycznych)</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/22595</link>
<description>Odpowiedzialność pracodawców wobec rodzin pracowników (na podstawie badań empirycznych)
Kamosiński, Sławomir
Employers’ responsibility towards employees' families follows from their responsibility for the employed person. It is not responsibility of a direct character. It is indirect responsibility that is, in fact, a consequence of moral and ethical principles. It should be assumed that not all relations between the employer and employee are governed by legal provisions. Some of them should be based on mutual trust, on a will for dialogue and respect. Undoubtedly, the relations between employers and employees in small, often family-type companies, where management is of paternalistic character, are often different from relations in a big company, where the owner, for objective reasons, has no opportunity to meet all workers personally. Nevertheless, in any company, regardless of size, in my opinion, the employer should take responsibility not only for the employed person, but also for his/her family. Following the above remarks, the way employers understand the concept of responsibility for employees’ families is presented in the first part of the paper. The description was based exclusively on opinions expressed by employers in the public media. Only well-known employers were selected, so-called “icons of entrepreneurship”. The second part of the paper, based on the author's empirical research conducted among workers employed in the private and public sectors, describes the same problem but from the point of view of employees. The main research question comes down to specifying ways in which an employer's responsibility for an employee’s families is best executed, apart from remuneration paid regularly for the performed job. As pointed out by many employees, an employed person would expect the employer to understand the correlation defined by many respondents as “employer awareness” i.e. understanding that family-related problems affect productivity at work. The research proved that employers’ awareness of taking responsibility for their employees’ families is gradually increasing.
</description>
<dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/22594">
<title>Aspekty etyczne polskiej transformacji gospodarczej w enuncjacjach Konferencji Episkopatu Polski</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/22594</link>
<description>Aspekty etyczne polskiej transformacji gospodarczej w enuncjacjach Konferencji Episkopatu Polski
Delong, Marek
The Polish Episcopate critically assessed the social and economic situation in Poland in the period of the transition from communism to democracy and freemarket economy. Privatizations led to production being stopped and an increase in unemployment. Profit became the measure of labor, not human dignity. The economic and social reality was dominated by the treatment of economics and financial success as the highest values, and the dissemination of the opinion that in politics and economics there are no values. The political elites showed an inability to develop long-term strategies for getting out of the crisis. The disappearance of the morality of many representatives of public life, which manifested itself in universal corruption and the aspiration to improve their social status as soon as possible, contributed to this state of affairs. As a result, there was a crisis of the idea of the common wealth and an increase in crime. The social crisis was particularly visible in moral attitudes, social behaviour, and in the economic sphere, public finance, on the labour market, and in the quickly progressing social stratification.
</description>
<dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/22593">
<title>Stosunek do własności w Polsce po 1989 roku w świetle filozofii politycznej liberalizmu</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/22593</link>
<description>Stosunek do własności w Polsce po 1989 roku w świetle filozofii politycznej liberalizmu
Szczepaniak, Karolina
The political philosophy of liberalism created by Locke and Nozick treats property as a birth right, the natural right of man. The attitude to ownership in Poland is determined by the experience of individuals having been deprived of the right to property during the communist period and the restitution of property rights in the post-communist era. The guidelines of the liberal concept of property refer in the text to contemporary phenomena of attitudes to property in the area of spatial economy and the housing market.The paper attempts to indicate the need to redefine contemporary attitudes to property.
</description>
<dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/22592">
<title>Reputacja jako instytucja: próba konceptualizacji i problemy pomiaru</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/22592</link>
<description>Reputacja jako instytucja: próba konceptualizacji i problemy pomiaru
Adamska, Agata; Dąbrowski, Tomasz J.
The article deals with the problem of identifying institutions and measuring them. As an example, reputation was taken into consideration. The analysis leads to the conclusion that reputation could be treated as an institution and could be measured in the context of its impact on economic outcomes. This measurement can be carried out at three levels of detail: micro, meso and macro, of which the third is the least recognized in new institutional economics.
</description>
<dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
