<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/50938">
<title>Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica 2004/67</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/50938</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/51742"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/51741"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/51740"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/51739"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-04-06T18:02:23Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/51742">
<title>Porozumienia monetarne w starożytnej Grecji</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/51742</link>
<description>Porozumienia monetarne w starożytnej Grecji
Adam-Magnisali, Sophia
The subject-matter of the paper is the presentation of forms in which there was&#13;
integration of means of payment that led Greek nation-town (polis) to the acceptance of&#13;
a common currency. The pretext for these considerations became the introduction of the&#13;
monetary circulation in Euro in Greece on 01.01.2002. The author in his article shows that&#13;
the idea of a common currency was known in the poleis already in the 4&#13;
th century B.C.&#13;
On the bases of finds of coins, it was determined that about the year 570 B.C.,&#13;
the Aeginetan stater, known also as "turtle" (chelona) was in circulation in Greek territory&#13;
in the east as well as in trade by barter between the islands. This proves also that&#13;
in reference to Aegina, Athens, Corinth talking about the functioning of coins of international range, and even the expression of them as "international currency" are substantial. A lot of attention is also devoted to the reasons that led to the usage of common&#13;
coins, as a consequence of making alliances (e.g. military), unions and leagues. Those&#13;
coins, in the last cases, were minted only on special occasions (e.g. payment to mercenaries)&#13;
as a result their sphere was relatively smaller. In the assessment of the author, the numismatic proofs are of significant importance, because of the Jack of other documents&#13;
and historical sources, to prove the fact that the idea of monetary uniformity is connected&#13;
to the history of the ancient world. In order to accentuate this observation, present the&#13;
example of the owl, which symbol is on the coin that has the value of one Euro. The&#13;
omission of the existence of monetary agreements already in ancient Greece is therefore&#13;
not justifiable when considering modern financial relationships.
</description>
<dc:date>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/51741">
<title>Ocena prawdziwości zeznań na podstawie analiz behawioralnych i wokalnych wskaźników emocji</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/51741</link>
<description>Ocena prawdziwości zeznań na podstawie analiz behawioralnych i wokalnych wskaźników emocji
Hołyst, Brunon
The assertion, if an individual is lying or telling the truth is not a simple task; one of&#13;
the basic problems in this case is excess information. There are too many sources of&#13;
information- words, breaks, sound of the voice, movements of the head, gestures, position of&#13;
the body, breath, reddening of the skin, becoming pale, sweating, which must be analysed&#13;
simultaneously. The sources can pass on information at the same time or successively,&#13;
competing with one another as to which is the most important in the process of lie detection.&#13;
One does not have to treat all that is heard and seen with the same precision. Not all&#13;
available sources of information during hearings are trustworthy. In addition, some of them&#13;
give more data than others. It is worth mentioning that most people concentrate their&#13;
attention on such sources as words and mimics.&#13;
People that purposely tell lies usually do not monitor, control and disguise all their&#13;
behaviour. Even if they want to do so, they would probably not be able to behave absolutely&#13;
in an effective way. It is difficult to imagine that someone can control every potential&#13;
behaviour that involves the whole body. People like these rather conceal and fake those&#13;
features, which they feel, would be most observed. They have the tendency to choose words&#13;
with the highest caution. So the problems arising from the evaluation of the authenticity of&#13;
the testimonies made the purposes of this paper.
</description>
<dc:date>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/51740">
<title>Pojęcie granic orzekania sądu odwoławczego w procesie karnym</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/51740</link>
<description>Pojęcie granic orzekania sądu odwoławczego w procesie karnym
Izydorczyk, Jacek
The article titled "The Concept of the Bounds of Adjudication at the Court of Appeal&#13;
in Pena! Proceedings" deals with the complicated problem of precise usage of terminology in&#13;
the scope of appeal proceedings in penal cases- especially on the bases of the Code of Penal&#13;
Proceedings of 1997 (k.p.k.).&#13;
The first thing to do was to characterise the model of proceeding during appeal in the&#13;
Polish pena! procedure, then there was an attempt to put in order the concepts involved in&#13;
that phase of the proceeding. The following concepts are mentioned there: the concept of&#13;
appeal itself, complaining, devolution and suspensiveness (absolute and relative), efficacy,&#13;
admissibility of such measure, the right to its application, so-called gravamen (otherwise&#13;
known as the importunity of the pronouncement) and the reformationis in peius prohibition&#13;
and others.&#13;
However, special attention is paid to the distinction of the following concepts: the bounds&#13;
of appeal and bounds of pronouncement of the court of appeal by consulting the rich&#13;
literature on the subject and in consequence the acknowledgement (on the bases of the&#13;
regulations of Code of Penal Proceeding of 1997), that the bounds of prosecution (that means&#13;
the scope in which the pronouncement was prosecuted). The scope of the pronouncement of&#13;
the court of appeal is additionally earmarked by three elements: a) raised objections of appeal&#13;
(that is showing a concrete fault in making pronouncement); b) the line of appeal (that is&#13;
the relationship of this type of measures and the interests of the suspect) and the reformations&#13;
in peius prohibition (the limitation of the possibility of the pronouncement to the disadvantage&#13;
of the suspect), and c) the so-called ne peius prohibition, which the substantial pronouncement&#13;
of the court of appeal (through the prohibition of the conviction of the suspect or the&#13;
aggravation of the punishment of deprivation of liberty for him as defined in art. 454 k.p.k.)&#13;
but they are not related to the line of the remedy of law.
</description>
<dc:date>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/51739">
<title>Czynności wyjaśniające w sprawach o wykroczenia (uwagi de lege lata i de lege ferenda)</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/51739</link>
<description>Czynności wyjaśniające w sprawach o wykroczenia (uwagi de lege lata i de lege ferenda)
Wójcicka, Barbara
The article is devoted to the analysis of the institution in charge of clarifying activities&#13;
in cases concerning petty offences.&#13;
The author discussed the objective, the character of clarifying activities, and the conditions&#13;
of their application and also the significance of these activities in the proceeding. The&#13;
evolution of the scrutinised institution in the development of the Polish petty offences law&#13;
was shown in the article; attention was also paid to the proposal of successive changes that&#13;
can lead to the simplification and the acceleration in the proceedings concerning cases&#13;
prosecuted as petty offence. The realisation of this objective is aimed at, among others, the&#13;
introduction of obligatory requirement of establishing the clarifying activities before placing&#13;
the motion for punishment by the public prosecutor and also the necessity of interrogation&#13;
of the suspect during these activities.
</description>
<dc:date>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
