http://hdl.handle.net/11089/11957 Mon, 06 Apr 2026 19:18:55 GMT 2026-04-06T19:18:55Z https://dspace.uni.lodz.pl:443/bitstream/id/8f0eca89-94a2-46f4-8538-5682b92613ab/ http://hdl.handle.net/11089/11957 http://hdl.handle.net/11089/11996 Samorządowe uprawnienia pracowników przedsiębiorstwa państwowego w Polsce Seweryński, Michał The idea of self-government of employees has no definite contents in the Polish legal doctrine. However, it is generally referred to the rights of the staff as regards management of the enterprise and deciding personnel matters. The range of the rights determines the self-government’s share in the system of management of the national economy and the degree of democratization of work-place relations. The legal basis for a participation of employees in managing the enterprise was first established by the decree of 6 February 1945 on formation of trade-union committees. However, later on, due to growing centralization of national economy management m the period of the 6-years plan (1950-1955) the participation of committees in managing the enterprise became reduced. First the statute on workers’ councils of 1956 established a legal basis for a wider participation of employees in managing enterprises. Due to its scope the participation approached the model of full workers’ co-management. The new conception of workers’ co-management was expressed by the statute of 1958. That statute was a step back in the development of the idea of workers’ co-management in Poland. The essential cause of gradual decline of workers’ co-management was its domination by the party and trade-union officiais. A new stage in the development of self-government legislation was begun after the great workers’ protest in August 1980. The statute of September 1981 on self-government of the staff of state enterprise is a result of social compromise and a successive attempt to overcome the socio-economic crisis by means of democratization of work-place relations. The range and character of competence, as regards managing the enterprise, granted to the staff by the statute of September 1981 is more far-reaching than the previous statute. The participation model prevails in the statute, although along with that there are elements characteristic for a full co-management in the form of the staffs right of taking decisions. Particularly important is voting production plans by the staff and extended influence of the staff on appointing a managing director of the enterprise. The present form of employees’ self-government in Poland is a successive stage of evolution in which periods of broader rights of the staff in management alternate with periods of their limitation. That process is closely connected with changes in political and economic structure. Aspirations to self-government manifested by workers are a reason why further improvement of self-government for democratization of social relations cannot be abandoned. Tue, 01 Jan 1991 00:00:00 GMT http://hdl.handle.net/11089/11996 1991-01-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/11089/11995 Postavenie ûstrednÿch orgânov Stâtnej sprâvy v československej federâcii Mikołaj, Mikulóś The author analyses the relationship between establishing of new organs of state administration and the idea of the federal state. In the conditions of the federation some relatively independnt systems of central state administration exist, conducted by particular authorities and corresponding representative organs.The competence of federal and republican organs of central state administration is based on the Czechoslovak Federation Act and other legal regulations. The federal structure of the Czechoslovak Federal Republic results in a structure different from that of a Unitarian state. The Czechoslovak Federation Act divided the former Unitarian state functions between the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic on one hand, and the Czech Socialist Republic and the Slovak Socialist Republic on the other. Some matters have been committed to the exclusive competence of the CSSR and others to the joint competence of the CSSR and both republics, or else to the exclusive competence of either republic. The exclusive competence of the federation covers foreign affairs including foreign policy, international contracts, representation of the CSSR and decisions on war and peace, defence of the CSSR, monetary matters, federal state material resources, federal legislation and administration within the competence of the federation, supervision of activity of federal organs, and protection of constitutional principles of the federation. The exclusive competence of the federation is based on the principle that in the above fields only the legislative and executive organs of state authorities, organs of state administration and federal judicial organs may operate. The joint competence of the federation and both republics covers planning, finance matters, banking system, fixing of prices, economic relations with foreign countries, industry, agriculture and food, transport, post office and telecommunication, development of science and technology, capital investments, labour and social policy, statistics, economic arbitration, industrial norms, legal situation of corporations, internal order and safety, the press, supervision. The exclusive competence of republics covers particularly such matters as: the health service, education,, culture, home trade, justice, forestry and water resources, land-surveying and mapping, granting of academic degrees, safety of work. The present development of the system of state administration, from the point of view of its organization, consists of development of traditional forms of state administration, but also gradual establishing and developing of new organs of state administration. This phenomenon is closely accompanied by a process of disappearing of certain previously existing administrative organs. Tue, 01 Jan 1991 00:00:00 GMT http://hdl.handle.net/11089/11995 1991-01-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/11089/11994 Rada Ministrów PRL w nowym systemie zarządzania gospodarką narodową Kosikowski, Cezary In the European socialist countries a model solution has been developed in which management of the national economy is mainly under the state administration, primarily the Cabinet. Thus on the central government tier several organs have been instituted, within the government or attached to it, which manage the national economy on behalf of the Cabinet. In People’s Poland that function was assigned to a numerous group of deputy premiers or else to the Presidium of the Cabinet, or to the Economic Committee of the Cabinet and the Planning Committee, and in the years 1981-1982 there was an Economic Committee of the Cabinet. In the assumptions of the economic reform a radical change of the existing system of subjects of management has been admitted towards a socialisation of management, restriction and change of the role of administration in management. Also the directions of changes in the position of the Cabinet in managing the national economy have been laid out. In the years 1981-1985 several changes realising the assumptions of the economic reform have been made. First they referred to the economic subjects and representative organs, and only indirectly to the administration and in particular the Cabinet. Essentially the position of the Cabinet in management has been changed. It covers all functions of management, including formulation of a programme of economic policy, law making, working up plans, supervision of execution and control. Most changes have been made through legislation. Partly the changes have been accepted by the Cabinet alone. However, the organisation of Cabinet’s work has been changed accordingly. The accepted changes have not a complete character. The author suggests a complete formulation of the intended reforms. It requires passing a bill on the Cabinet, a bill on legislation, a bill on social consultation and scientific advising, and a bill on the system of economic control. Tue, 01 Jan 1991 00:00:00 GMT http://hdl.handle.net/11089/11994 1991-01-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/11089/11993 Najwyższa Izba Kontroli w II Rzeczypospolitej pod rządami konstytucji z 23 kwietnia 1935 roku Krawczyk, Ryszard The author of the paper distinguishes three periods in the life of the Supreme Board of Audit: 1) until 1921 (the period of interim constitution), 2) until 1935 (the period of the March Constitution in force), 3) after 1935 (the period of the April Constitution in force). The institution of the Supreme Board of Audit is actually analysed in the period alter 1935, i.e. the last five years of existence of the 2nd Republic. The author’s concern with the subject is caused by a complete lack of any study referring to that period in the life of the Supreme Board of Audit. To explain properly the changing relationship between the board and the parliament or government, the rules of activity of the Board have been presented, basing upon the National Audit Act of 3 June 1921. The author also remarks that during the last five years before World War II the Supreme Board of Audit was transformed from a supervising organ into an accounting one. The transition was due to a lack of concern with the problems of audit in the parliament, and also to a depreciating and unfriendly attitude of the government, representing the interests of the „sanacja” (a ruling political group of former followers of Piłsudski) majority. Tue, 01 Jan 1991 00:00:00 GMT http://hdl.handle.net/11089/11993 1991-01-01T00:00:00Z