| dc.contributor.author | Lewandowska, Małgorzata Stefania | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Trzmielak, Dariusz M. | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Ropęga, Jarosław | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-10T13:31:42Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-05-10T13:31:42Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-83-922375-6-3 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/21523 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The aim of this paper is to assess of the influence of institutional
cooperation (with research institutes and universities) on the innovation
performance of companies as well as determinants of such cooperation. The
analysis was based on data from the Polish version of the Community
Innovation Survey (CIS) for 2008-2010. The sample consists of 7783
medium-sized and large manufacturing enterprises from sections C to E.
Based on the results of a structural equation model it has been concluded that
there is a statistically significant relation between institutional cooperation
and innovation performance of the researched companies,
as well as (in the case of cooperation with Polish companies) in the
introduction of product innovations new for the country, Europe or the world.
The analysis of critical values between parameters enables the establishment
of a hierarchy of company features which determines such cooperation. These
include the system of employee incentives for the creation of intellectual
property, company size and own R&D -department. The application of the
employee incentive system better explains the decision to establish
cooperation with Polish companies than with foreign ones. However a feature
which is not institutional cooperation friendly
is belonging to a larger group of companies. Key words: institutional
cooperation, innovation -performance, Polish CIS, Poland | pl_PL |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Preparation and printing funded by the National Agency for Research and Development under project “Kreator Innowacyjności – wparcie dla Przedsiębiorczości akademickiej” | pl_PL |
| dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
| dc.publisher | Center for Technology Transfer UŁ | pl_PL |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Innovations and knowledge commercialization: cooperative resources, integrated science and business/ ed. by Dariusz M. Trzmielak, Jarosław Ropęga; | |
| dc.subject | science and industry cooperation | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | innovation performance of enterprises | pl_PL |
| dc.title | Determinants of cooperation with institutional partners and innovation - performance of Polish manufacturing enterprises. Research outcomes | pl_PL |
| dc.type | Book chapter | pl_PL |
| dc.rights.holder | © Center for Technology Transfer UŁ | pl_PL |
| dc.page.number | 173-190 | pl_PL |
| dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Warsaw School of Economics, Institute of International Management and Marketing, Collegium of World Economy | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Serrano-Bedia A., Lopez-Fernandez C., Garca-Piqueres G, Decision of institutional cooperation on R&D. Determinants and sectoral differences, European Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 13, no 4, 2010, pp. 439–465. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Bedyńska S., Książek M., Statystyczny drogowskaz 3. Praktyczny przewodnik wykorzystania modeli regresji oraz równań strukturalnych. Wydawnictwo Akademickie Sedno, Warszawa, 2012. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Lokshin, B., Cooperative R&D and firm performance, Research Policy, no 33, 2004a, pp. 1477–1492. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Diederen, B., Lokshin, B., Veugelers, R., Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies, International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 22, no 8, 2004b, pp. 1237–1263. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Chesbrough, H., Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 2003. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A., Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D, Economic Journal, no 99, 1989, pp. 569–596. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A., Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. „Administrative Science Quarterly”, no 35, 1990, pp. 128–152. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | De Wit, B., Meyer, R., Synteza strategii, PWE, Warszawa, 2007. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Działalność innowacyjna przedsiębiorstw w latach 2008-2010, GUS, Warszawa, 2012. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Fontana, R., Geuna, A., Matt, M., Factors affecting universityindustry R&D projects: the importance of searching, screening and signaling, Research Policy, vol. 35, no 2, 2006, pp. 309–323. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Gaul, M., Machowski, A., Elementy analizy ścieżek, [in:] Wielozmiennowe modele statystyczne w badaniach psychologicznych, red. J. Brzeziński, PWE, Warszawa, Poznań, 1987. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Grant, R.M., The Resource-based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation, California Management Review, no 33, 1991, pp. 114–135. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Kogut, B., Zander, U., Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology, Organization Science, vol. 3, no 3, 1992, pp. 383–397. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Hamel, G., Prahalad, C.K., Strategic Intent, Harvard Business Review, vol. 67, no 3, 1989, pp. 63–76. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Kessler, E. H., Bierly, P. E., & Gopalakrishnan, S. Internal vs. external learning in new product development: effects on speed, costs and competitive advantage, „R & D Management”, vol. 33, no 3, 2000, pp. 213–223. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Kim, Y., Lui, S. S., Networks and firm innovation in emerging markets: the case of Korean manufacturing firms, Paper presented at the 36th European International Business Academy Annual Conference, Porto, Portugal, 2010. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Kleinknecht, A., Reijnen, J.O.N., Why do firms cooperate on R&D? An empirical study, Research Policy, vol. 21, no 4, 1992, pp. 347–360. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Książek, M., Regresja liniowa jest modelem strukturalnym!, Predictive Solutions, Biuletyn, 2012. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Laursen, K., Salter, A., Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation?, Research Policy, vol. 33, no 8, 2004, pp. 1201–1215. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Lichtenthaler, U., Open innovation: past research, current debates, and future directions, Academy of Management Perspectives, vol. 25, February 2011, pp. 75–93. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Leiponen, A., Why do firms not collaborate? The role of competencies and technological regimes, [in:] Innovation and Firm Performance: Econometric Exploration of Survey Data, [ed.] Kleinknecht, A., Mohnen, P., Palgrave, London, 2002, pp. 253–277. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Lööf, H., Brostrom, A., Does knowledge diffusion between universities and industry increase innovativeness?, „Journal of Technology Transfer”, no 33, 2008, pp. 73–90. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Mohnen, P., Hoareau, C., What type of enterprise forges close links with universities and government labs? Evidence from CIS 2, „Managerial and Decision Economics”, vol. 24, no 2, 2003, pp. 133–145. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Monjon, S., Waelbroeck, P., Assessing spillovers from universities to firms: evidence from French firm-level data, „International Journal of Industrial Organization”, no 21, 2003, pp. 1255–1270. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Miozzo, M., Dewick, P., Networks and innovation in European construction: benefits from inter-organisational cooperation in a fragmented industry, „International Journal of Technology Management”, no 27, 2004, pp. 68–92. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Mothe, C., Uyen Nguyen Thi, T., The link between non-technological innovations and technological innovation, “European Journal of Innovation Management”, vol. 13, no 3, 2010, pp. 313–332. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Möller, K.E., Törrönen, P., Business supplier's value creation potential. ”Industrial Marketing Management”, vol. 32, 2003, pp. 109–118. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Nieto, M.J., Santamaria, L., The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation, „Technovation”, no 27, 2007, pp. 367–377. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Perek-Białas, J., A. Pleśniak, A., Wprowadzenie do modelowania równań strukturalnych z AMOS-em. Materiały na Zimowe Warsztaty Analityczne, SWPS. Predictive Solutions, 5-6 February, Warszawa, 2013. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Rutkowski, I.P., Rozwój nowego produktu. Metody i uwarunkowania. PWE, Warszawa, 2007. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Robin, S., Schubert, T., Cooperation with public research institutions and success in innovation: Evidence from France and Germany, „Research Policy”, vol. 42, 2013, pp. 149–166. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Tether, B., Who co-operates for innovation, and why: an empirical analysis, “Research Policy”, vol. 31, no 6, 2002, pp. 947–967. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Veugelers, R., Cassiman, B., Foreign subsidiaries as a channel of international technology diffusion: some direct firm level evidence from Belgium, „European Economic Review”, vol. 48, 2004, pp. 455–476. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Veugelers, R., Cassiman, B., R&D cooperation between firms and universities. Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing, „International Journal of Industrial Organization”, vol. 23, no 5, 2005, pp. 355–379. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Von Hippel, E., Democratizing innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. 2005. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Eurostat Statistics Database [inn_cis7 http://epp.eurostat.ec. europa.eu/], accessed on: 19.03.2013. | pl_PL |
