<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Linguistica Tom 002 (1981)</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/14500" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/14500</id>
<updated>2026-04-06T06:10:18Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-06T06:10:18Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Z dyskusyjnych problemów słowotwórstwa</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/14688" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Puzynina, Jadwiga</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/14688</id>
<updated>2018-02-01T11:20:08Z</updated>
<published>1981-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Z dyskusyjnych problemów słowotwórstwa
Puzynina, Jadwiga
The article deals with three problems:&#13;
Firstly, it discusses the interpretation of the word-formation “stem“&#13;
(here the author tries to define what the stem is: whether it is the whole&#13;
periphrase, the word-torn or the lexeme if it is the lexeme - what primary&#13;
function has it got as a part of speech).&#13;
Secondly, interpretations of the derivative are reviewed. Most often the&#13;
derivative is interpreted as a lexeme there is also the problem of its primary&#13;
function as a category.&#13;
Thirdly, the article deals with the problem o£ assigning meaning to formatives. The author, contrary to A. Bogusławski, speaks in favour of assigning&#13;
meaning both to formatives and to other elements of the texts which have&#13;
no loose connection with other segments of the texts.
</summary>
<dc:date>1981-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Informacje zawarte w formach fleksyjnych polskich rzeczowników oraz ich rozkład na temat i końcówkę</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/14675" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Wierzbowski, Ludwik</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/14675</id>
<updated>2018-02-01T11:19:57Z</updated>
<published>1981-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Informacje zawarte w formach fleksyjnych polskich rzeczowników oraz ich rozkład na temat i końcówkę
Wierzbowski, Ludwik
The author proves the necessity of two different language descriptions in&#13;
computer synthesis and analysis of texts. Later he discusses the information&#13;
carried by inflexional forms of Polish nouns from the point of view of its&#13;
range and quality. &#13;
He distinguishes between lexical and inflexional information, its boundary&#13;
being inconsistent with that of the root and the ending, since the information&#13;
in the two is complementary as has been shown in the examples.&#13;
The last part of the paper reviews the characteristics of endings of Polish noun declensions.
</summary>
<dc:date>1981-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>O spójnikach i partykułach odmiennych przez osobę</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/14672" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Świdziński, Marek</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/14672</id>
<updated>2018-02-01T11:19:57Z</updated>
<published>1981-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">O spójnikach i partykułach odmiennych przez osobę
Świdziński, Marek
In the contribution, various ways of syntactic description of those connectives&#13;
and particles that are obligatorily followed by personal endings&#13;
are discussed (e.g. czyżby “interrogative particle (in dubitative questions)",&#13;
gdyby "if (unreal past)", żeby "in order to"). A number of solutions&#13;
(inflexional, lexicographic, syntactic I, syntactic II) are considered.&#13;
Their evaluation is made from the point of view of an automatic syntactic&#13;
analysis. Priority of given to the last solution. Preteritive forms of&#13;
verbs, such as, for example, przyszedłeś "you came, lit. come + Past + 2&#13;
person sing, masc,", miałem "I had» lit. have + Past + 1 person sing, masc.",&#13;
usually described as agglutinative, are suggested here to be treated as&#13;
analytic, i.e. containing two words: a past participle and an auxiliary.&#13;
Needless to say, an auxiliary can always precede a participle, In particular,&#13;
the above mentioned connectives and particles must link with the auxiliary.
</summary>
<dc:date>1981-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Czy stopień przymiotnika jest w języku polskim kategorią fleksyjną?</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/14671" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Szupryczyńska, Maria</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/14671</id>
<updated>2018-02-01T11:20:01Z</updated>
<published>1981-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Czy stopień przymiotnika jest w języku polskim kategorią fleksyjną?
Szupryczyńska, Maria
The article deals with the controversial problem of the position of adjective&#13;
comparison in the morphological description of Polish. The morphological&#13;
structure of these adjective forms ia more complicated than the&#13;
structure of noun decclension forms. Despite this, morphemes of comparison&#13;
case may be treated as inflexional, since the function of a particular grammatical&#13;
category is the criterium of the inflexional character of morphemes.&#13;
The author speaks in favour of the inflexional character of adjective comparison&#13;
forms on the basis of the following theoretical findings:&#13;
1) the three case forms are produced from a large number of adjectives»&#13;
2) the comparison case differentiates the paradigms of corresponding lexemes&#13;
in a complete and identical ways&#13;
3) the categories - positive, comparative, superlative - determine oppositional&#13;
sub-sets within the whole set of adjective forms understood as one&#13;
lexeme.&#13;
Some irregular cases, morphologically similar to comparison cases should&#13;
be treated by dictionaries as inflexional. Inflexional forms can be found&#13;
only in one-word synthetic forms, analytic forms should be treated as sentence&#13;
constructions consisting of two different word forms (adjective + adverb).
</summary>
<dc:date>1981-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
