<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris 34 (3/2016)</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/20093" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/20093</id>
<updated>2026-04-03T18:01:21Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-03T18:01:21Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Language Dynamics in the case of an Omniscient in the Jain Literature of Classical Period (5th-10th c. CE)</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/20197" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Glinicka, Małgorzata</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/20197</id>
<updated>2018-02-01T11:21:08Z</updated>
<published>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Language Dynamics in the case of an Omniscient in the Jain Literature of Classical Period (5th-10th c. CE)
Glinicka, Małgorzata
The article “Language Dynamics in the case of an Omniscient” is the study of the idea of an omniscient person on the basis of the classical Jain literature (5th–10th c. CE) in the context of language materiality, human activity and entanglement of a person into karmic bondage.
</summary>
<dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Zagadka Timajosa</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/20196" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Grzybowski, Juliusz</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/20196</id>
<updated>2018-02-01T11:21:01Z</updated>
<published>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Zagadka Timajosa
Grzybowski, Juliusz
This article focuses around the riddle, which Timaeus asks Socrates. I will therefore deal with troublesome absence of Socrates in troublesome dialogue of Plato’s. I will deal with a riddle and I will try to remember that the riddle is deadly dangerous, at least for those who deal with wisdom, and therefore perhaps especially for philosophers. I will evoke the fragment B 56 of Heraclitus, where we can hear the story about Homer’s death. Briefly: I will be wondering why Socrates is not dead after hearing riddle of Timaeus.
</summary>
<dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The objective character of virtues in Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/20148" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Papiernik, Joanna</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/20148</id>
<updated>2021-07-08T10:56:51Z</updated>
<published>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The objective character of virtues in Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology
Papiernik, Joanna
Marsilio Ficino did not write a methodical, complete treatise on ethics, but&#13;
the ethical questions are discussed in most of his writings, including his&#13;
opus magnum entitled Theologia Platonica. The most important sources for&#13;
Ficino’s ethical considerations are Platonic and Neoplatonic texts and this&#13;
is strongly reflected in Theologia; one of the aspects of this dependence&#13;
regards the nature of virtues: they are seen as unchangeable, indivisible&#13;
and that is why they are objective. The main purpose of the paper is to&#13;
present the objective character of virtues in Platonic Theology by invoking&#13;
their definition, role and status with references to Plato’s works.
</summary>
<dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Przemoc jako konstytutywny element teorii polityczności. Carl Schmitt a tzw. kwestia żydowska</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/20147" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Slováček, Petr</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rubisz, Lech</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/20147</id>
<updated>2018-02-01T11:20:48Z</updated>
<published>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Przemoc jako konstytutywny element teorii polityczności. Carl Schmitt a tzw. kwestia żydowska
Slováček, Petr; Rubisz, Lech
Article deals with the relationship between Carl Schmitt’’s political&#13;
theory and political theology, which inherently works with the violence&#13;
assumption, and the so called jewish question. Author shows the way&#13;
the enemy of the political is gradually constructed on the basis of&#13;
textual and doctrinal analysis. The core of Schmitt’s enemy construction&#13;
depends on the refusal of the philosophical tradition, which assume that&#13;
all man are equal as far as they are participating in one common nature&#13;
or are in actual or potential possesion of reason. This refusal is the basis&#13;
on which the criticism of normativism, for Schmitt in the inter-war&#13;
period represented especially by jewish thinkers such as Hans Kelsen, is&#13;
built to be after 1933 used in open attack on Jews as such.
</summary>
<dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
