<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris 35 B (4B/2016)</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/20857" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/20857</id>
<updated>2026-04-04T00:25:07Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-04T00:25:07Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Jak pogodzić perfekcjonizm i eudajmonizm z hedonizmem? Wokół utylitaryzmu J. S. Milla</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/20891" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Filipow, Elżbieta</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/20891</id>
<updated>2018-02-01T11:21:07Z</updated>
<published>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Jak pogodzić perfekcjonizm i eudajmonizm z hedonizmem? Wokół utylitaryzmu J. S. Milla
Filipow, Elżbieta
J. S. Mill is commonly considered as a representative of psychological hedonism. However, his utilitarianism has also eudaimonic and perfectionistic aspects. Thus, various aspects are interelated with one another not only in his moral philosophy, but are present also in his political philosophy. Interpretators of Mill’s philosophy inquire: how those aspects can be reconciled and if Mill's conception can be consistent then? Main aim of the paper is to explain and justify the view, that the idea of happiness by J. S. Mill based on the greatest happiness principle is founded on both traditions present in the Ancient times: eudaimonism and hedonism. I assume, that: in philosophy of J. S. Mill, formulated in the perspective of both traditions of the idea of happiness and good life, hedonism can be reconciled with eudaimonism and perfectionsm. Philosopher can be qualified as many-sided and eclectic, thus denominating his exclusively as hedonist would be incomplete and would be a result of too hasty and imprecise reading of his works.
</summary>
<dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Melancholic Irony of Kierkegaard</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/20890" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Cȃmpean, Flaviu-Victor</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/20890</id>
<updated>2018-02-01T11:21:09Z</updated>
<published>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Melancholic Irony of Kierkegaard
Cȃmpean, Flaviu-Victor
The Socratic truth is in no way inferior to the Christian one in&#13;
Kierkegaard’s view. The fundamental difference between the two is that&#13;
whereas the later develops by means of a donation and of a specific&#13;
dialectic as such, the former is hidden within the negative and antidialectical&#13;
discourse of irony. We can therefore maintain that irony always&#13;
pertains to the melancholic dimension of existence. My work aims to&#13;
consider irony as a melancholic negativity, insofar as it is closely related to&#13;
the demonic silence and void and as it rejects the wholeness of&#13;
philosophical language. Sickness and health, symptom and remedy, the&#13;
Kierkegaardian irony is melancholic because it perpetually suffers from its&#13;
own re-opened wound, which allows us to interpret it from a&#13;
psychoanalytical standpoint. Thus, the affinity between Kierkegaard and&#13;
psychoanalysis sustains a Lacanian approach to the melancholic irony, in&#13;
order to clarify its function in pinpointing the “real” truth of existence&#13;
through a resistance to language.
</summary>
<dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Założenia metafizyczne w programie pozytywizmu logicznego</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/20889" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Firlej, Mateusz</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/20889</id>
<updated>2018-02-01T11:21:07Z</updated>
<published>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Założenia metafizyczne w programie pozytywizmu logicznego
Firlej, Mateusz
In the present study I analyzed some aspects of the program of logical&#13;
empiricism. I devoted particular attention to issues such as&#13;
demarcation criterion, protocol sentence or logical syntax. These issues&#13;
have been considered mainly through the prism of the work of Rudolf&#13;
Carnap, while the contribution of other representatives of the Vienna&#13;
Circle was rather kind of argumentative background. Mentioned&#13;
philosophical trend had to stand in the closest possible touch with&#13;
science. Therefore, fundamentally discredited metaphysical issues as&#13;
meaningless. According to the author, such a radical distinction&#13;
between sense and nonsense is unauthorized. Key neo-positivist&#13;
postulates themselves are based on certain metaphysical assumptions.
</summary>
<dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Historiozoficzny apokaliptyzm C. G. Junga</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/20888" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bytniewski, Jerzy</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/20888</id>
<updated>2018-02-01T11:21:08Z</updated>
<published>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Historiozoficzny apokaliptyzm C. G. Junga
Bytniewski, Jerzy
Critique of culture is one of the biggest parts of philosophy/psychology&#13;
created by Carl Gustav Jung. Jung was witness of World War I and&#13;
World War II, his thought was deeply influenced by writings of F.&#13;
Nietzsche, who assured us that we (modern people) are sentenced to&#13;
Age of nihilism. Jung seemed to take over this belief, developing it inside&#13;
his own philosophical system. In Jung’s way of thinking Age of nihilism&#13;
turned into a monumental discourse about New Age, where overgrown&#13;
Enlightment’ Reason must abdicate, leaving its position to The Age of&#13;
new spirituality. In my paper I’m trying to present thought of The Swiss&#13;
psychologist as an apocalyptical prophecy, but not only apocalyptical.&#13;
My aim is to find bright beam among this very pessimistic part of his&#13;
oeuvre.
</summary>
<dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
