<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Qualitative Sociology Review 2021 Volume XVII Issue 2</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/38312" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/38312</id>
<updated>2026-04-14T17:25:53Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-14T17:25:53Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>A Penile Implant: Embodying Medical Technology</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/38414" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nash, Jeffrey E.</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/38414</id>
<updated>2021-07-30T01:33:39Z</updated>
<published>2021-04-30T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">A Penile Implant: Embodying Medical Technology
Nash, Jeffrey E.
This article situates the experiences of having penile implant surgery between medical interventions and privately understood meanings and practices. Using my own experiences, supplemented with information from online sources, I document the changes that occur in the meanings and the practices that implant surgery enables. My analysis derives from the concepts of habitus and the looking glass body, and it begins with a diagnosis of impotence and moves through the various considerations that lead to surgery and its aftermaths. I suggest that understanding how medical technology interacts with everyday meanings contributes to a wider application of the concept of habitus while expanding a symbolic interactionist perspective of the body.
</summary>
<dc:date>2021-04-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Activation and Restoration of Shame in an Intimate Relationship: A First-Hand Account of Self-Injury</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/38415" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Gunnarsson, Nina Veetnisha</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/38415</id>
<updated>2021-07-30T01:33:38Z</updated>
<published>2021-04-30T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Activation and Restoration of Shame in an Intimate Relationship: A First-Hand Account of Self-Injury
Gunnarsson, Nina Veetnisha
This paper is grounded in a first-hand account of my own experiences with self-injury and shame. By using my personal diary entries as support for this account and a sociological framework of shame, I explore the process of shame and shame reactions in an intimate relationship. I illustrate how shame was activated by my internalized critical other, how the shame cycle de-stabilized my relationship, and, finally, how shame was restored through the other’s validation and acceptance, or how it led to more shame managed by self-injury. However, this account is not simply about self-analysis, or a need to indulge in my pain; rather, it is an inner dialogue that rests on the commitment to develop a richer understanding of the personal and interpersonal experiences of self-injury and shame. Today, I finally understand how shame works and this has helped me to not get caught up in my emotions. So, although shame may take a hold of me at times, I am no longer, like before, controlled by my shame.
</summary>
<dc:date>2021-04-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Between Political Myths, Dormant Resentments, and Redefinition of the Recent History: A Case Study of Serbian National Identity</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/38412" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Wygnańska, Joanna</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/38412</id>
<updated>2021-07-30T01:33:40Z</updated>
<published>2021-04-30T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Between Political Myths, Dormant Resentments, and Redefinition of the Recent History: A Case Study of Serbian National Identity
Wygnańska, Joanna
The subject of the article concerns the issue of constructing and reconstructing national identity. The object of interest here is a sociological case study of Serbian national identity. It includes reconstruction and interpretation of in-depth interviews conducted in Serbia with the representatives of Serbian symbolic elites. The concept of symbolic elites is approached in the discussed research from Teun van Dijk’s perspective. Thus, they are individuals and groups directly involved in the production of public opinion, who have an impact on the content of publicly available knowledge, and the creation and legitimization of public discourse. The work is embedded in the methodological framework of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and is based on the assumptions of the Discourse‐Historical Approach (DHA). In this optics, the most important thing is the historical and social context of the studied process of the discursive construction of national identity. Therefore, the conclusions also touch upon the historical, political, and social perspective of the formation of Serbian national identity. The reflection also aims at presenting the analysis from the contemporary perspective (mainly in 2008-2020). Thus, paying attention to the political divisions in Serbia and the country’s road to democratization and European integration, the discussed research study shows the comprehensive specifics of the studied national identity.
</summary>
<dc:date>2021-04-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Reframing Patient’s Autonomy in End-of-Life Care Decision-Making: Constructions of Agency in Interviews with Physicians</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/38413" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Buscariolli, André</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Vesala, Kari Mikko</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/38413</id>
<updated>2021-07-30T01:33:43Z</updated>
<published>2021-04-30T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Reframing Patient’s Autonomy in End-of-Life Care Decision-Making: Constructions of Agency in Interviews with Physicians
Buscariolli, André; Vesala, Kari Mikko
In the research literature, critical viewpoints question the idea of patient autonomy as a robust basis for approaching end-of-life treatments. Yet physicians express distinctly positive attitudes towards patient autonomy and advance directives in questionnaire studies. In this article, we unravel taken-for-granted assumptions about the agency that physicians use when evaluating patient autonomy in end-of-life care. We use Goffmanian frame analysis to analyze semi-structured interviews with eight Finnish physicians. Instead of measuring standardized responses, we explore in detail how distinct evaluations of patient autonomy are made through approving or reserved stand-taking. The results show that the interviewees reframed patient autonomy with the help of biological, medical, ethical, and interaction frames. Through such reframing, the patient’s agency was constructed as vulnerable and weak in contrast to the medical expert with the legitimated capacity to act as an agent for the patient. Further, end-of-life treatment decisions by the patient, as well as the patient’s interests appeared as relationally defined in interactions and negotiations managed by the physician, instead of attesting the sovereign agency of an autonomous actor.
</summary>
<dc:date>2021-04-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
