<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Qualitative Sociology Review 2024 Volume XX Issue 3</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/52950" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/52950</id>
<updated>2026-04-16T15:21:06Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-16T15:21:06Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>The Hegemonization and Counter-Hegemonization of Polish Copyright Discourses</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/52968" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Radomska, Ewa</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/52968</id>
<updated>2024-08-21T01:32:59Z</updated>
<published>2024-07-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Hegemonization and Counter-Hegemonization of Polish Copyright Discourses
Radomska, Ewa
This article explores the nature and structure of Polish discourses on copyright, specifically revealing to what extent social conflict over copyright is visible within these discourses and presenting the most important parties in this conflict. Following Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe’s discursive reconstruction of the hegemony, the article indicates that Polish copyright discourses are structured by an alternating sequence of discursive hegemonic and counter-hegemonic practices. The article specifies the most important logic applied within discursive battles over copyright by deconstructing the central dualities visible in Polish copyright debates. Hegemonization and counter-hegemonization of the discourses are indicated based on the discourse analysis of the Polish public debate on copyright and a qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews and focus group interviews with representatives of selected parties in the social conflict over copyright.
</summary>
<dc:date>2024-07-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>“Maintain Your Hope and Know That You Are Loved.” Mr. Anthony Albanese’s Discursive Construction of Collective Emotional Resilience</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/52967" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Zubrzycka-Czarnecka, Aleksandra</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/52967</id>
<updated>2024-08-21T01:32:55Z</updated>
<published>2024-07-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">“Maintain Your Hope and Know That You Are Loved.” Mr. Anthony Albanese’s Discursive Construction of Collective Emotional Resilience
Zubrzycka-Czarnecka, Aleksandra
This paper employs Stephanie Paterson’s empathic policy analysis framework to explore the discursive construction of emotional resilience. The research conducted for the paper focuses on Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s notion of emotional resilience during a press conference he delivered on October 15, 2023, in the context of the Voice referendum. Mr. Albanese discursively frames the concept of emotional resilience as emotional stability that builds the community’s resistance to crisis situations, enables progress, and avoids division. The study identifies two emotional discourses influencing this portrayal of emotional resilience: (1) a discourse of emotional stability among opponents of the Voice referendum and (2) a discourse of emotional stability among supporters of the referendum. The article analyzes the assumptions underlying this representation and the silences—that which has been left unspoken or implied—associated with it.
</summary>
<dc:date>2024-07-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Book Review: Sena, Barbara. 2024. The Case Study in Social Research. History, Methods, and Applications. London, New York: Routledge, Taylor &amp; Francis Group</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/52969" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rausky, María Eugenia</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/52969</id>
<updated>2024-08-21T01:32:51Z</updated>
<published>2024-07-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Book Review: Sena, Barbara. 2024. The Case Study in Social Research. History, Methods, and Applications. London, New York: Routledge, Taylor &amp; Francis Group
Rausky, María Eugenia
</summary>
<dc:date>2024-07-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Why Is It So Hard to Talk About Same-Sex Experience? A Case Study of Veiled Silence in a Research Relationship through Reflexive and Autoethnographic Lens</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/52965" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Gammon, Thi</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/52965</id>
<updated>2024-08-21T01:32:56Z</updated>
<published>2024-07-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Why Is It So Hard to Talk About Same-Sex Experience? A Case Study of Veiled Silence in a Research Relationship through Reflexive and Autoethnographic Lens
Gammon, Thi
Research into intimate details of human life can be challenging for the parties involved. This article is a case study of a research situation in which I, as an interviewer, failed to elicit information from a male Vietnamese interviewee who evaded discussing specific details of his romantic life. I argue that this situation—the man’s avoidance of sharing details of his feelings toward people of the same sex and my discomfort in facing his avoidance—reveals a culture of silence regarding same-sex experiences in Vietnam. The study utilizes autoethnographic anecdotes of my experience of growing up in such a culture and observing similar evasive attitudes. It also adopts a reflexive approach that delves into segments of my second research encounter with the interviewee as well as my internal struggles, including feelings of anxiety and guilt about probing into an informant’s romantic life. It seeks to enrich Lisa A. Mazzei’s concept of “veiled silence,” which describes the deliberate non-engagement with taboo topics by linking it with the idea of a “culture of silence,” or a disempowering social environment, and discussing these concepts in the context of Vietnam. It also contributes to the literature on LGBTQ+ matters in Vietnam and qualitative research methods by recommending greater attention to silence in research encounters, which can offer unexpected insights for studies into sensitive issues.
</summary>
<dc:date>2024-07-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
