<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/34188">
<title>New Dynamics in Asia</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/34188</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/34235"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/34234"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/34215"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/34209"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-04-09T12:51:29Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/34235">
<title>Managing Asia: A 21st Century “Chingbirok”? Opportunities in Trade Balanced Against Risk Factors In East, South, and Southeast Asian Security</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/34235</link>
<description>Managing Asia: A 21st Century “Chingbirok”? Opportunities in Trade Balanced Against Risk Factors In East, South, and Southeast Asian Security
Jones, David A.
Żakowski, Karol
Asia requires management in areas that interface, including manufacturing and assembly of goods, quality control, transportation of raw materials, delivery of finished products to markets, protecting intellectual property, providing services. Some management should be domestic, subject to different traditions and values within each country. Domestic Asian management, even pan-Asian management, is not working optimally. A “Chingbirok” or “Book of Corrections” seems required. Implicitly, this is an invitation for foreign partners to join into this conversation, because the welfare of all nations concerned depends upon effective and efficient management of Asia, especially the economies of populous Asian countries themselves. Actual and rhetorical belligerence should subside, Sino-American and Sino-European investment should be optimised, freedom of maritime navigation maintained through deterrence strategies. This paper will outline essentially an Anglo-American plan to secure a competitive maritime corridor across the “Near” Seas from Japan through the Suez Canal to the Mediterranean, an overland railway and highway across the Russian Federation, plus an alternative seaway across the Arctic Ocean, rendered navigable by global warming. America’s primary responsibility may focus on protecting Taiwan plus East Asian countries, with Britain’s to concentrate on safeguarding the Indian subcontinent and Malaysia as its former colonies. Functionally, the United Kingdom and United States should assume a proactive role in providing investment and oversight across China’s “New Silk Road” to ensure harmony and deter the outbreak of hostilities within Eurasia, exerting muscular intervention in cooperation with their  Asian Allies as required. Concrete objectives should be to maintain self-governance of Taiwan and all Asian states, unfettered South China Sea navigation, preservation of Western technology from Chinese plunder or coerced acquisition, together with an opportunity for a rising Asian middle class to purchase Western goods without restriction, each a component of America’s Free and Open Indo-Pacific (FOIP) Strategy articulated by President Donald J. Trump.
</description>
<dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/34234">
<title>A Case Study of the Fulbright Program in Korea</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/34234</link>
<description>A Case Study of the Fulbright Program in Korea
Li, Su-Chun
Żakowski, Karol
The U.S. Fulbright Program, the flagship of international educational exchange programs in the world, was&#13;
established in 1946, after the devastation of World War II. It aimed for an innovative, peaceful world. The&#13;
Republic of Korea was one of the first twenty signatory countries, where the US war surplus was used to&#13;
fund the bilateral academic/cultural exchanges. This article reviews the history of the US-ROK agreement,&#13;
including: funding, the Board, programs, and its evolvement over the past 60 years. This research discovered some unique aspects in Korean Fulbright which adapted to the local needs for national development.
</description>
<dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/34215">
<title>A Review and Evaluation of Recent Scholarship on America’s War in Vietnam</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/34215</link>
<description>A Review and Evaluation of Recent Scholarship on America’s War in Vietnam
Jervis, David
Żakowski, Karol
This review examines three recently-published books about the Vietnam War: Max Hastings, Vietnam: An Epic Tragedy, 1945-1975, Max Boot, The Road Not Taken: Edward Lansdale and the American Tragedy in Vietnam, and Brian VanDeMark, Road to Disaster: A New History of America’s Descent into Vietnam. As indicated by the books’ titles, they all depict the war as a ‘tragedy,’ ‘a disaster,’ etc. The review will detail their explanations for the Vietnam tragedy and evaluate the alternatives they suggest.
</description>
<dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/11089/34209">
<title>Evaluating the Dynamic Changes in Asian Countries</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/11089/34209</link>
<description>Evaluating the Dynamic Changes in Asian Countries
Zakowski, Karol
Żakowski, Karol
</description>
<dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
