Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica 24/2011
http://hdl.handle.net/11089/4372
2024-03-28T19:33:47ZBajki funkcjonalistów
http://hdl.handle.net/11089/4589
Bajki funkcjonalistów
Skalski, Tadeusz
One of the most controversial principles of contemporary functionalism is the so-called principle
of organizational invariance. Roughly speaking it states that all systems with the same fine
grained functional organization have the same conscious experience. The author of this article
tries to show that the principle leads to absurdity.
2011-01-01T00:00:00ZWłasności i prawa przyrody w esencjalizmie dyspozycyjnym
http://hdl.handle.net/11089/4588
Własności i prawa przyrody w esencjalizmie dyspozycyjnym
Wodzisz, Rafał
The aim of this paper is to articulate dispositonal essentialism (DE) as a viable position in the
discussions considering properties and laws of nature. In the first part of the article there are given
several "must have" trades of properties in DE. They are followed by the conceptions themselves.
The last part of the article brings a little insight about ceteris paribus laws in DE.
2011-01-01T00:00:00ZFaktualizm Davida Armstronga
http://hdl.handle.net/11089/4587
Faktualizm Davida Armstronga
Firszt, Dawid
In my article I present David Armstrong's stance on properties, relations, particulars and states of
affairs. I introduce this categories to show, at the most general level, his metaphysical system
called factualism. My article consists of four parts, in each one I characterize following categories:
1. Properties 2. Relation 3. Particulars 4. States of affairs. I also discuss Armstrong's arguments
considering the nature of those categories and their role in his philosophy. Also, I try to emphasis
differences between Armstrong's factualism and other contemporary metaphysical positions
(Bundle theory and Trop theory).
2011-01-01T00:00:00ZZasady intelektualizmu
http://hdl.handle.net/11089/4586
Zasady intelektualizmu
Drozdowicz, Zbigniew
In the view, which is proposed here, intellectualism is what brings together and not what divides,
and its rules are placed in some manner over every distinction. This means, that intellectualism is
being treated by me as a collective work. Its most early versions occurred along the occurrence of
first philosophers. Later on, they were often corrected, perfected or also so immensely changed,
that under more than one condition they varied from the originals. Many philosophers took part in
the making of this work, but some had a lesser and some greater influence. To those, who
significantly contributed to its emergence and functioning in European philosophy and science,
there belonged such authors like Socrates, Descartes, and Popper.
2011-01-01T00:00:00Z