Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorScheffler, Pawel
dc.contributor.authorCinciała, Marcin
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-17T10:47:59Z
dc.date.available2015-12-17T10:47:59Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationP. Scheffler, M. Cinciała, Explicit vs. Implicit L2 grammar knowledge in written error correction, [in:] FLOW. Foreign Language Opportunities in Writing, eds. J. Majer, Ł. Salski, Łódź University Press, Łódź 2011, p. 61–77.pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-7525-564-5
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/15693
dc.description.abstractError correction is undoubtedly an important part of the process of drafting and producing written texts. The aim of the paper is to analyse the learners’ ability to correct grammatical errors in relation to the type of knowledge they employ in this task. Green and Hecht (1992), in an often quoted study, found a low correlation between L2 learners’ knowledge of explicit grammar rules and their ability to correct errors. They interpret this as suggesting that in error correction, learners rely primarily on their implicit knowledge. However, certain design features of their study might have caused the subjects to simply guess the correct forms, which, in turn, as DeKeyser (2003) suggests, may have led to the overestimation of implicit knowledge. This paper reports the results of an experiment where 150 Polish learners of English were administered a corpus-based error correction task, the design of which, however, differed from that of Green and Hecht (1992). These alterations resulted in finding a much closer link between the subjects’ knowledge of rules and their ability to correct grammatical errors.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartof“FLOW. Foreign Language Opportunities in Writing”, eds. J. Majer, Ł. Salski, Łódź University Press, Łódź 2011;
dc.titleExplicit vs. Implicit L2 grammar knowledge in written error correctionpl_PL
dc.typeBook chapterpl_PL
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2011pl_PL
dc.page.number[61]-77pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationAdam Mickiewicz University.pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnotePaweł Scheffler is an assistant professor at Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań. His research interests include Second Language Acquisition, corpus linguistics and theoretical syntax. He has published in a variety of journals both in Poland and abroad, including some of the major ones. He is the author of “Repetytorium gramatyczne w zdaniach do tłumaczenia” [English grammar in sentence translations], a popular pedagogical grammar book on the Polish market.pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteMarcin Cinciała is a PhD student at Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, where he received his M.A. in linguistics in 2007. His M.A. thesis focused on contemporary approaches to Control Theory within minimalist syntax. His current research interests include generative grammar, contrastive Polish-English syntax and the relation between grammar and SLA.pl_PL
dc.referencesAlderson, J. Ch., C. Clapham and D. Steel. 1997. “Metalinguistic Knowledge, Language Aptitude and Language Proficiency.” Language Teaching Research, 1. 93-121.pl_PL
dc.referencesBialystok, E.. 1979. “Explicit and implicit judgements of L2 grammaticality.” Language Learning, 29. 81-103.pl_PL
dc.referencesDeKeyser, R. M. 1997). “Beyond explicit rule learning: automatizing second language morphosyntax.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19. 195-221.pl_PL
dc.referencesDeKeyser, R. M. 1998. “Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practising second language grammar.” In C. J. Doughty and J. Williams (eds.), Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. 42-63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesDeKeyser, R. M. 2003. “Implicit and Explicit Learning.” In C. J. Doughty and M. H. Long (eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. 313-348. Oxford: Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesDeKeyser, R. M. 2007. “Skill Acquisition Theory.” In J. Williams and B. VanPatten (eds). Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An introduction. 97-113. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.pl_PL
dc.referencesDoughty, C. J. and J. Williams (eds.) 1998. Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesDoughty C. J. and M. H. Long (eds.). 2003. The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesEllis, N. C. 2005. “At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit knowledge.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27. 305-352.pl_PL
dc.referencesEllis, N. C. 2007. “The weak interface, consciousness, and form-focused instruction: mind the doors.” In Sandra Fotos and Hossein Nassaji (eds.), Form-focused instruction and Teacher Education: Studies in honour of Rod Ellis. 17-34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesEllis, R. 1997. SLA Research and Language Pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesEllis, R. 2005. “Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. A psychometric study.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27. 141-172.pl_PL
dc.referencesEllis, R. 2006. “Modelling learning difficulty and second language proficiency: The differential contributions of implicit and explicit knowledge.” Applied Linguistics, 27. 431-463.pl_PL
dc.referencesEllis, R. 2008. “Investigating grammatical difficulty in second language learning: Implications for second language acquisition research and language testing.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18. 4-22.pl_PL
dc.referencesGranger, S. 1998. “The computer learner corpus: a versatile new source of data for SLA research.” In S. Granger (ed.), Learner English on Computer. 3-17. London: Longman.pl_PL
dc.referencesGreen, P. S. and K. Hecht. 1992. “Implicit and explicit grammar: An empirical study.” Applied Linguistics, 13. 168-184.pl_PL
dc.referencesHousen, A., M. Pierrard and S. Van Daele. 2005. “Structure complexity and the efficacy of explicit grammar instruction.” In A. Housen and M. Pierrard (eds.), Investigations in Instructed Second Language Acquisition. 235-269. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesHu, G. 2002. “Psychological constraints on the utility of metalinguistic knowledge in second language production.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24. 347-86.pl_PL
dc.referencesHulstijn, J. H. 1995. “Not all grammar rules are equal: Giving grammar instruction its proper place in foreign language teaching.” In R. Schmidt (ed.), Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning. 359-86. Honolulu: University of Hawaii at Manoa.pl_PL
dc.referencesHulstijn, J. H. 2002. Towards a unified account of the representation, processing and acquisition of second language knowledge. Second Language Research 18. 193-223.pl_PL
dc.referencesHulstijn, J. H. and W. Hulstijn. 1984. “Grammatical errors as a function of processing constraints and explicit knowledge.” Language Learning 34. 23-43.pl_PL
dc.referencesHulstijn, J. H. and R. de Graff. 1994. “Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A research proposal.” In J. H. Hulstijn and R. Schmidt (eds.), Consciousness in Second Language Learning. AILA Review 11. 97-112.pl_PL
dc.referencesJohnson, K. 1996. Language Teaching and Skill Learning. Oxford: Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesKrashen, S. D. 1982. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.pl_PL
dc.referencesKrashen, S. D. 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. London: Longman.pl_PL
dc.referencesKrashen, S. D. 1994. “The input hypothesis and its rivals.” In Nick Ellis (ed.), Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages. 45-77. London: Academic Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLong, M. H. and P. Robinson. 1998. “Focus on form. Theory, research and practice.” In C. J. Doughty and J. Williams (eds.), Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. 15-41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMacrory, G. and V. Stone. 2000. “Pupil progress in the acquisition of the present perfect tense in French: the relationship between knowledge and use.” Language Teaching Research 4(1). 55-82.pl_PL
dc.referencesNorris, J. M. and L. Ortega. 2000. “Effectiveness of L2 instruction: a research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis.” Language Learning 50. 417-528.pl_PL
dc.referencesOdlin, T. 1994. Perspectives on Pedagogical Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesRobinson, P. 1996. “Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search, and instructed conditions.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18. 27-67.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchmidt, R. W. 1990. “The role of consciousness in second language learning.” Applied Linguistics 11. 17-46.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchmidt, R. W. 2001. “Attention.” In P. Robinson (ed.), Cognition and Second language Instruction. 1-32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchmidt, R. W. and S. N. Frota. 1986. “Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: a case study of an adult learner of Portugese. 237-326.” In R. R. Day (ed.), Talking to Learn: Conversation in Second language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.pl_PL
dc.referencesSharwood Smith, M. 1981. “Consciousness-raising and the second language learner.” Applied Linguistics, 2. 159-169.pl_PL
dc.referencesSheen, R. 2005. “Focus on formS as a means of improving accurate oral production.” In A. Housen, and M. Pierrard (eds.), Investigations in Instructed Second Language Acquisition. 271-310. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesSorace, A. 1985. “Metalinguistic knowledge and language use in acquisition- poor environments.” Applied Linguistics, 6. 239-254.pl_PL
dc.referencesWestney, P. 1994. “Rules and pedagogical grammar.” In T. Odlin (ed.), Perspectives on Pedagogical Grammar. 72-96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referenceshttp://www.staff.amu.edu.pl/~przemka/picle.html.pl_PL
dc.referenceshttp://ifa.amu.edu.pl/~kprzemek/PICLE_search.php.pl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord