Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorKusiak, Monika
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-17T10:50:05Z
dc.date.available2015-12-17T10:50:05Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationM. Kusiak, Developing a creative foreign language reader: in search of a theoretical approach and didactic techniques, [in:] FLOW. Foreign Language Opportunities in Writing, eds. J. Majer, Ł. Salski, Łódź University Press, Łódź 2011, p. 41–52.pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-7525-564-5
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/15698
dc.description.abstractThe paper discusses different conceptions of creativity in relation to reading in a FL. It looks at psycholinguistic approaches that view creativity as a mentalistic individual creative thought. Further, it discusses sociocultural theories that take in account social, cultural and environmental factors. Special attention is given to a critical aspect of creativity. In the next section, the author looks at how psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic approaches view literacy and what they can offer for both FL/L2 research and pedagogy. The presentation argues for viewing the FL/L2 reading situation as an interaction of cognitive and social factors and emphases the importance of developing skills to critique texts. It suggests a set of tasks to be applied in a FL classroom aiming at improving creative reading skills.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartof“FLOW. Foreign Language Opportunities in Writing”, eds. J. Majer, Ł. Salski, Łódź University Press, Łódź 2011;
dc.titleDeveloping a creative foreign language reader: in search of a theoretical approach and didactic techniquespl_PL
dc.typeBook chapterpl_PL
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2011pl_PL
dc.page.number[41]-52pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationJagiellonian University.pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteMonika Kusiak, PhD, is a senior lecturer at the Foreign Language Teacher Training College of the Jagiellonian University, where she teaches courses in methodology and psycholinguistics. Her interests include reading in a foreign language, classroom discourse analysis and the role of a first language in foreign language learning. She has written numerous articles in scholarly journals; she has also co-authored three course books for EFL learners and the handbook for foreign language teacher trainees.pl_PL
dc.referencesAlderson, C. J. 2000. Assessing reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesAnderson, R. C. 1978. Schema-directed processes in language comprehension. In A. M. Lesgold, J. W. Pellegrino, S. D. Fokkema and R. Glaser (eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.pl_PL
dc.referencesBandura, E. 2004. “The use of portfolio in developing literary literacy”. Personal communication.pl_PL
dc.referencesBernhardt, E. B. 1991. Reading development in a second language: Theoretical, empirical and classroom perspectives. Norwood, NY: Ablex.pl_PL
dc.referencesBloome, D. 1985. “Procedural display”. Unpublished manuscript. Amherst, MA: University of Massachussetts dissertation.pl_PL
dc.referencesBortnowski, S. 2000. “Matura 2002 – nowa i kontrowersyjna”. Polonistyka, 10. 584-590.pl_PL
dc.referencesCarter, R. 2004. Language and creativity: The art of common talk. New York: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesChrząstowska, B. 2000. “Matura z gabinetu”. Polonistyka 10. 590-595.pl_PL
dc.referencesCope, B. and M. Kalantzis. 1993. “Introduction: How a genre approach to literacy can transform the way writing is taught”. In B. Cope and M. Kalantzis (eds.) The powers of literacy, 1-22. London: Falmer Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesCsikszentmihalyi, M. 1999. “Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity”. In R. J. Sternberg (ed.), Handbook of creativity, 313-335. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesDechant, E. .1991. Understanding and teaching reading: An interactive model. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.pl_PL
dc.referencesFish, S. 1980. Is there a text in this class? Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Giroux, H. 1983. Schooling and the struggle for public life. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGoodman, K. 1986. What‟s whole in whole language? Richmond Hill, ON, Scholastic.pl_PL
dc.referencesHalpern, D. F. 2003. Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.pl_PL
dc.referencesInformator maturalny. 2003. Warszawa: Centralna Komisja Egzaminacyjna.pl_PL
dc.referencesJohns, A. M. 1997. Text, role and context. Developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKusiak, M. 2000. “The Effect of metacognitive strategy training on reading comprehension and metacognitive knowledge”. Unpublished manuscript. Kraków: Jagiellonian University Dissertation.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcCormick, K. 1997. The culture of reading and the teaching of English. Manchester: Manchester University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMonin, N. 2004. Management theory: A critical reading. London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesMunby, J. 1968. Read and think. Harlow: Longman.pl_PL
dc.referencesNiżegorodcew, A. 2000. Academic writing “in statu nascendi”. Paper presented at the 9th International IATEFL Poland Conference in Kraków.pl_PL
dc.referencesRosenblatt, L. 1983. Literature as exploration. 4th ed. New York: MLA.pl_PL
dc.referencesSmith, F. 1988. Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. 4th ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.pl_PL
dc.referencesZalewski, J. 2004. Epistemology of the composing process: Writing in English for General Academic Purposes. Opole: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Opolskiego.pl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord