Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDzionek-Kozłowska, Joanna
dc.contributor.authorMatera, Rafał
dc.description.abstractAcemoglu and Robinson’s theory presented in their famous Why Nations Fail, and other papers, should be placed among the institutional theories of economic development. Yet the problem is they strongly differentiate their concept from the so-called culture hypothesis, which they reject. This stance is difficult to accept, not only because of the significance of culture-related factors of economic development, but it is also difficult to reconcile with their own model. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that such a strong rejection of the culture hypothesis is inconsistent with their own analysis, triggers some principal problems with understanding the basic notion of institution, and suggests Acemoglu and Robinson are only focused on considering formal institutions. The article concludes with the statement that, paradoxically, Acemoglu and Robinson’s unconvincing rejection of the culture hypothesis may be regarded as a justification of the importance of culture-related factors.pl_PL
dc.publisherFaculty of Economics and Sociology of the University of Lodzpl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLodz Economics Working Papers;9/2016
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska*
dc.subjectInstitutional Economicspl_PL
dc.subjectDaron Acemoglupl_PL
dc.subjectJames Robinsonpl_PL
dc.subjectInstitutions vs Culture Controversypl_PL
dc.subjectEconomic Developmentpl_PL
dc.titleInstitutions Without Culture. A Critique of Acemoglu and Robinson's Theory of Economic Developmentpl_PL
dc.typeWorking Paperpl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationFaculty of Economics and Sociology, University of Lodzpl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationFaculty of Economics and Sociology, University of Lodzpl_PL
dc.referencesAcemoglu, D. (2009), Introduction to Modern Economic Growth, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesAcemoglu, D. and J. A. Robinson (2008), ‘The Role of Institutions in Growth and Development’, The World Bank Commission on Growth and Development Working Paper no. 10, Washington DC: World Bank.pl_PL
dc.referencesAcemoglu, D. and J. Robinson (2012), Why Nations Fail. The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty, New York: Profile Books, Crown Publishers.pl_PL
dc.referencesAcemoglu, D. and J. Robinson, (2015), ‘The Rise and Decline of General Law of Capitalism’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(1): 3–28.pl_PL
dc.referencesAcemoglu, D., S. Johnson, and J. A. Robinson (2005), Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth, in Ph. Aghion and S. Durlauf, Handbook of Economic Growth, vol. 1A. Elesvier: North-Holland, pp. 385–472.pl_PL
dc.referencesAcemoglu, D., S. Johnson, and J. A. Robinson (2001), ‘The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation’, American Economic Review, 91(5): 1369–1401.pl_PL
dc.referencesBennette, R. A. (2012), Fighting for the Soul of Germany. The Catholic Struggle for Inclusion after Unification, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBeugelsdijk, S. and R. Maseland (2011), Culture in Economics. History, Methodological Reflections, and Contemporary Applications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBlaug, M. (2003), ‘The Formalist Revolution of the 1950s.’, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 25(2): 145-156. DOI:10.1080/1042771032000083309.pl_PL
dc.referencesClark, Ch. and W. Kaiser (eds.) (2003), Culture Wars: Secular-Catholic Conflict in Nineteenth Century Europe, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesDzionek-Kozlowska, J. (2015), ‘Economics in Times of Crisis. In Search of a New Paradigm in Economic Sciences’, Journal of Philosophical Economics: Reflections on Economic and Social Issues, 9(1): 52-72.pl_PL
dc.referencesDzionek-Kozłowska, J. and R. Matera (2015), ‘New Institutional Economics’ Perspective on Wealth and Poverty of Nations. Concise Review and General Remarks on Acemoglu and Robinson’s Concept’, Scientific Annals of the ‟Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iaşi. Economic Sciences, 62(3): 11-18. DOI: 10.1515/aicue-2015-0032.pl_PL
dc.referencesEasterly, W. (2015), The Tyranny of Experts. Economists, Dictators and the Forgotten Rights of the Poor, New York: Basic Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesFriedrich, C. J. and Z.K. Brzezinski (1965), Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGodłów-Legiedź, J. (2010), Współczesna ekonomia. Ku nowemu paradygmatowi? [Contemporary Economics. Toward the New Paradigm?], Warsaw: Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck.pl_PL
dc.referencesGreif, A. and J. Mokyr (2016), ‘Institutions and Economic History: A Critique of Professor McCloskey’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 12(1): 29–41. DOI:10.1017/S1744137415000417.pl_PL
dc.referencesGrief, A. (1994), ‘Cultural Beliefs and the Organization of Society: A Historical and Theoretical Reflection on Collectivist and Individualist Societies’, Journal of Political Economy, 102(5): 912– 950.pl_PL
dc.referencesGrief, A. (2006), Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade, Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGuiso, L., P. Sapienza, and L. Zingales, (2006), ‘Does Culture Affect Economic Outcomes?’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2): 23–24.pl_PL
dc.referencesHayek, F. A. (1948), Individualism and Economic Order, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHeydemann, S. (2008), ‘Institutions and Economic Performance: The Abuse of Culture in New Institutional Economics’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 43(2): 27-52. DOI: 10.1007/s12116-007-9015-3.pl_PL
dc.referencesHodgson, G. M. (2006), ‘What Are Institutions?’, Journal of Economic Issues, 40(1): 1–25.pl_PL
dc.referencesHodgson, G. M. and J. W. Stoelhorst (2014), ‘Introduction to the Special Issue on the Future of Institutional and Evolutionary Economics’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 10(4): 513–540. DOI:10.1017/S1744137414000393.pl_PL
dc.referencesJevons, W. S. (1888), The Theory of Political Economy, 3rd edition, London: Macmillan. At:
dc.referencesKeynes, J. M. (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, London: Macmillan.pl_PL
dc.referencesLal, D. (2006), Reviving the Invisible Hand. The Case for Classical Liberalism in the Twenty-First Century, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLoewenstein, K. (1957), Political Power and the Governmental Process, Chicago 1957, quoted after: R. Pipes, Russia Under the Bolshevik Regime, Vintage Books, Random House 1995.pl_PL
dc.referencesMäki, U. (2009), ‘Economics Imperialism: Concept and Constraints’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 39(3): 351-380.pl_PL
dc.referencesMarshall, A. (1920), Principles of Economics, 8th edition, London: Macmillan, The Online Library of Economics and Liberty. At
dc.referencesMarx, K. (1972), A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, Ed. M. Dobb, International Publishers, 1972.pl_PL
dc.referencesMaseland, R. (2011), ‘How to Make Institutional Economics Better’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(4): 555–559. DOI:10.1017/S1744137411000221.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcCloskey, D. N. (2002), The Secret Sins of Economics, Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press. At
dc.referencesMcCloskey, D. N. (2016a), Bourgeois Equality: How Ideas, Not Capital or Institutions, Enriched the World, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcCloskey, D. N. (2016b), ‘Max U versus Humanomics: A Critique of Neoinstitutionalism’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 12(1): 1–27. DOI:10.1017/S1744137415000053.pl_PL
dc.referencesMénard, C. and M. M. Shirley (2014), ‘The Future of New Institutional Economics: from Early Intuitions to a New Paradigm?’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 10(4): 541–565. DOI:10.1017/S174413741400006X.pl_PL
dc.referencesNorth, D. C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesNorth, D. C. (1991), ‘Institutions’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1): 97-112.pl_PL
dc.referencesNorth, D.C. (2005), Understanding the Process of Economic Change, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesPejovich, S. (2003), ‘Understanding the Transaction Costs of Transition: It's the Culture, Stupid’, Review of Austrian Economics, 16(4): 347–361.pl_PL
dc.referencesSachs, J. (2005), The End of Poverty. The Economic Possibilities for Our Time, New York: Penguin Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSen, A.K. (1982), Poverty and Famines. An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSen, A.K. (1999), Development as Freedom, New York: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSmith, A. (1904), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Edited by Edwin Cannan, Methuen & Co., London 1904, The Online Library of Economics and Liberty. At
dc.referencesSpiegler, P. and W. Milberg (2009), ‘The Taming of Institutions in Economics: the Rise and Methodology of the ‘New New Institutionalism’’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 5(3): 289– 313. DOI:10.1017/S1744137409990026.pl_PL
dc.referencesStaniszkis, J. (1999), Post-Communism. The Emerging Enigma, Institute of Political Studies, Warsaw: Polish Academy of Sciences.pl_PL
dc.referencesStiglitz, J. E. (2012), The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future, New York: W.W. Norton.pl_PL
dc.referencesTabellini, G. (2008), ‘Institutions and Culture. Presidential Lecture’, Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(2–3): 255–294.pl_PL

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska