Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorGabrielczak, Piotr
dc.contributor.authorSerwach, Tomasz
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-28T08:00:40Z
dc.date.available2017-02-28T08:00:40Z
dc.date.issued2017-02
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/20707
dc.description.abstractThe goal of the article is to evaluate the impact of the European Union (EU) accession on the complexity of goods in Slovak exports. The traditional theories or trade (Ricardian and Heckscher-Ohlin models) show that such an engagement in economic integration may lead to specialization in the production of either more or less sophisticated goods, depending on the country’s technological advancement and factor endowment. At the same time, increased FDI flows may stimulate the engagement of a country in international production chains with ambiguous effects on export complexity. Because it is impossible to a priori predict the effect economic integration may have on the complexity, it is reasonable to verify it empirically. The authors used the Synthetic Control Method (SCM) to compare the observed post-accession levels of exports complexity in Slovakia with the counterfactual values of that country remaining outside of the EU. The obtained results show that the accession led to an increase in complexity of exported goods.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherFaculty of Economics and Sociologypl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLodz Economics Working Papers;6
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/*
dc.subjecteconomic integrationpl_PL
dc.subjectEuropean Unionpl_PL
dc.subjectinternational tradepl_PL
dc.subjectcomplexitypl_PL
dc.subjecttreatment effectpl_PL
dc.subjectSynthetic Control Methodpl_PL
dc.titleEconomic integration and export complexity: the case of Slovakiapl_PL
dc.typeWorking Paperpl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociologypl_PL
dc.referencesAbadie, A., Diamond, A., Hainmueller, J. (2010). Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(490), 493-505.pl_PL
dc.referencesFremeth, A.R., Holburn, G.L.F., Richter, B.K. (2013),Making Causal Inferences in Small Samples using Synthetic Control Methodology: Did Chrysler Benefit from Government Assistance?, Social Science Research Network, DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2135294.pl_PL
dc.referencesGlick, R., Rose, A. (2016), Currency Unions and Trade: A Post-EMU Mea Culpa, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 10615.pl_PL
dc.referencesHausmann, R., Hwang, J., Rodrik, D. (2007), What you export matters, Journal of Economic Growth, 12(1), 1-25, DOI:10.1007/s10887-006-9009-4.pl_PL
dc.referencesHausmann, R., Klinger, B. (2007), The Structure of the Product Space and the Evolution of Comparative Advantage, Center for International Development at Harvard University Working Paper No. 146.pl_PL
dc.referencesHidalgo, C.A., Hausmann, R. (2009), The building blocks of economic complexity, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10570-10575.pl_PL
dc.referencesHidalgo, C.A., Hausmann, R. (2011), The network structure of economic output, Journal of Economic Growth, 16 (4), 309-342, DOI: 10.1007/s10887-011-9071-4.pl_PL
dc.referencesKaul, A., Klößner, S., Pfeifer, G., Schieler, M. (2016), Synthetic Control Methods: Never Use All Pre-Intervention Outcomes as Economic Predictors. Mimeo, Saarland University. [Retrieved 2017-02-11] Available at: http://www.oekonometrie.uni-saarland.de/papers/SCM_Predictors.pdf.pl_PL
dc.referencesKoren, M., Tenreyro, S. (2013), Technological Diversification, The American Economic Review, 103(1), 378-414, DOI: 10.1257/aer.103.1.378.pl_PL
dc.referencesLall, S. (2000), The Technological Structure and Performance of Developing Country Manufactured Exports, 1985-1998, University of Oxford Queen Elizabeth House Working Paper No. 44.pl_PL
dc.referencesMayer, T., Zignago, S. (2011), Notes on CEPII’s distances measures: The GeoDist database, CEPII Working Paper No. 2011-25.pl_PL
dc.referencesMicco, A., Ordoñez, E., Stein, G. (2003), The Currency Union Effect on Trade: Early Evidence from EMU, Economic Policy, 18(37), 315-356.pl_PL
dc.referencesRodrik, D., Subramanian, A., Trebbi, F. (2002), Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development, NBER Working Paper No. 9305.pl_PL
dc.referencesRose, A. (2000), One money, one market: The effect of currency unions on trade, Economic Policy, 15(30), 7-46.pl_PL
dc.referencesSantos Silva, J., Tenreyro, S. (2010), Currency Unions in Prospect and Retrospect, Annual Review of Economics, 2, 51-74.pl_PL
dc.referencesTang, M.-K., Wei, S.-J. (2006), Is Bitter Medicine Good for You? The Economic Consequences of WTO/GATT Accessions. Paper presented at the Trade Conference, Research Department, IMF, Washington DC.pl_PL
dc.referencesWorldwide Governance Indicators, World Data Bank. [Retrieved 2017-02-11] Available at:http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=worldwide-governance-indicators.pl_PL
dc.referencesŽúdel, B, Melioris L. (2016), Five Years in Balloon: Estimating the Effects of Euro Adoption in Slovakia Using the Synthetic Control Method, OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 1317.pl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska