Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorKnapińska, Anna
dc.contributor.authorTomczyńska, Aldona
dc.contributor.editorTrzmielak, Dariusz M.
dc.contributor.editorRopęga, Jarosław
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-27T17:03:33Z
dc.date.available2017-04-27T17:03:33Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-922375-6-3
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/21486
dc.description.abstractThe states which top the list of the number of conducted research and development activities put substantial emphasis on a scientist’s competencies. Today, experts are able to determine the competencies that will decide on the success of projects in the next decade. They include, among others, leadership skills, team work, entrepreneurship as well as international and cross-sector mobility. What is the place of Polish scientists in relation to these competencies? What are their strongest and weakest points? How do the competencies of Polish scientists translate into the success of projects conducted in our country? These questions were to find their answers thanks to the research conducted in 2011 commissioned by the National Information Processing Institute. This article presents some of the results. It includes, amongst others, the differences between scientists from science departments and companies as well as between project managers and members of research teams.pl_PL
dc.description.sponsorshipPreparation and printing funded by the National Agency for Research and Development under project “Kreator Innowacyjności – wparcie dla Przedsiębiorczości akademickiej”pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherCenter for Technology Transfer UŁpl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofInnovations and knowledge commercialization: cooperative resources, integrated science and business/ ed. by Dariusz M. Trzmielak, Jarosław Ropęga;
dc.subjectInnovationpl_PL
dc.subjectscientists competences and innovation projectspl_PL
dc.titleCompetencies of Polish Scientists as a Contribution to the Success of Innovation Research and Development Projectspl_PL
dc.typeBook chapterpl_PL
dc.rights.holder© Center for Technology Transfer UŁpl_PL
dc.page.number33-51pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationThe National nformation Processing Institutepl_PL
dc.referencesAudretsch D.B., Boente W., Krabel S., Commercializing Academic Research – Investigating Why Individual Scientists Cooperate with Private Firms, paper presented at the Summer Conference 2010 on “Opening Up Innovation: Startegy, Organization and Technology” at Imperial College London Business School, June 16-18, 2010, http://www2.druid.dk/conferences/viewpaper.php?id=501358&cf=43.pl_PL
dc.referencesBoyatzis R.E., The Competent Manager. A Model for Effective Performance, Wiley, New York, 1982.pl_PL
dc.referencesCieślik J., Guliński J., Matusiak K.B., A. Skala-Późniak, Edukacja dla przedsiębiorczości akademickiej, PARP, Poznań – Warszawa, 2011.pl_PL
dc.referencesClark B.R., Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organisational Pathways of Transformation, Published for the IAU Press by Pergamon Press, Oxford – New York, 1998.pl_PL
dc.referencesDubois D.D., Rothwell W.J., Competency-Based Human Resource Management, Davies-Black Publishing, Mountain View, California 2004.pl_PL
dc.referencesGryzik A., Knapińska A., Zarządzanie projektami badawczorozwojowymi w sektorze nauki, OPI, Warszawa, 2012.pl_PL
dc.referencesGryzik A., Knapińska A., Tomczyńska A., Zarządzanie projektami badawczo-rozwojowymi w sektorze przemysłu, OPI, Warszawa, 2012.pl_PL
dc.referencesGeodecki T., Gorzelak G., Górniak J., Hausner J., Mazur S., Szlachta J., Zaleski J., Kurs na innowacje. Jak wyprowadzić Polskę zrozwojowego dryfu?, Fundacja GAP, Kraków, 2012.pl_PL
dc.referencesFreeman Ch., Soete L., The Economics of Industrial Innovation, Routledge, 3rd edition, 1997.pl_PL
dc.referencesKerzner H., Advanced Project Management, Polish edition, Helion, Gliwice, 2005.pl_PL
dc.referencesKijeńska-Dąbrowska I., Lipiec K., Rola akademickich ośrodków innowacji w transferze technologii, OPI, Warszawa, 2012.pl_PL
dc.referencesLamblin P., Etienne C., Skills and competences needed in the research field objectives 2020, Apec and Deloitte Consulting, 2010.pl_PL
dc.referencesLeja K., Uniwersytet: tradycyjny – przedsiębiorczy – oparty na wiedzy, in: „Nauka i Szkolnictwo Wyższe”, vol. 28, no 2, 2006.pl_PL
dc.referencesLipiec K., Komercjalizacja wyników badań naukowych a ośrodki transferu technologii, OPI, Warszawa, 2011.pl_PL
dc.referencesMatusiak K.B., Budowa powiązań nauki z biznesem w gospodarce opartej na wiedzy. Rola i miejsce uniwersytetu w procesach innowacyjnych, SGH, Warszawa, 2010.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcLagan P., The Models, w: Models for HRD Practice, American Society for Training and Development, Alexandria, 1989.pl_PL
dc.referencesMill J.S., On Liberty, Bromwich D., Kateb G., ed., Yale University Press, New Haven, London, 2003.pl_PL
dc.referencesOrłowski W.M., Komercjalizacja badań naukowych w Polsce. Bariery i możliwości ich przełamania, PWC dla NCBR, Warszawa, 2013.pl_PL
dc.referencesEuropean Commission, Innovation Union Scoreboard, http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/files/ius-2013_en.pdf.pl_PL
dc.referencesEuropean Commission ECSC – EAEC, Green Paper on Innovation, Brussels – Luxembourg, 1996.pl_PL
dc.referencesEuropean Patent Office, http://www.epo.org/about-us/annualreports-statistics/annual-report/2012/statistics-trends/grantedpatents.html.pl_PL
dc.referencesEurostat, Research and Development Expenditure by Sector of Performance, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu.pl_PL
dc.referencesOECD, Measuring Innovation: A New Perspective, 2010.pl_PL
dc.referencesOECD, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2011, 2011.pl_PL
dc.referencesOECD, Science and Technology Industry Outlook 2012, 2012.pl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord