Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorKasim, Kamer
dc.contributor.editorŻakowski, Karol
dc.contributor.editorKowalski, Bartosz
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-05T09:39:25Z
dc.date.available2019-07-05T09:39:25Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationKasim K., Power Shift in Taiwan and Its Implications on Cross-Strait Relations, [w:] Żakowski K., Kowalski B. (ed.), Power Shifts in East Asia and Their Implications for Asia-Europe Relations, „Contemporary Asian Studies Series”, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2019, s. 51-68, doi: 10.18778/8142-287-1.03pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-8142-287-1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/29249
dc.description.abstractTsai Ing-wen of the DPP won the presidential elections on 16th January 2016 and was sworn in as Taiwan’s President on 20 May 2016. The discussions about the future of cross-strait relations started with reference to the previous DPP administration’s policy of 2000–2008. The tense cross-strait relations of the DPP era were replaced with more harmonious ones with Ma Ying-jeou of KMT from 2008 to 2016. KMT acted on the basis of the 1992 consensus. The change of power with the election of Tsai Ing-wen raised questions about the basis and continuation of the cross-strait dialogue. Tsai-Ing-wen in her inauguration speech pledged to maintain the existing mechanisms for dialogue and communication across the Taiwan Strait. She also emphasized that Taiwan would conduct cross-strait affairs in accordance with the Republic of China Constitution, the Act Governing Relations between the People of Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area, and other relevant leg¬islation. The important question with regards to cross-strait relations is: how does China evaluate Tsai Ing-wen’s intentions about cross-strait relations and conduct its policies? In this paper the cross-strait policy of the new administration in Taiwan will be analyzed through DPP’s foreign policy. Since cross-strait relations cannot be analyzed just as a relation between Taiwan and China due to Taiwan’s ties with the US, the paper will also evaluate the new US administrations’ Taiwan policy. The cross-strait relations and the US regional role also have international implications due to the South and East China Sea dispute, which creates major security concerns.pl_PL
dc.description.sponsorshipPublication is a part of the project: Regional Center for International Debate in Lodz 2017–2018 Project co-financed by the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairspl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofPower Shifts in East Asia and Their Implications for Asia-Europe Relations;
dc.relation.ispartofseriesContemporary Asian Studies Series;
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectTaiwanpl_PL
dc.subjectChinapl_PL
dc.subjectUSpl_PL
dc.subjectTsai-Ing wenpl_PL
dc.subjectDemocratic Progressive Partypl_PL
dc.subjectCross-Straitpl_PL
dc.titlePower Shift in Taiwan and Its Implications on Cross-Strait Relationspl_PL
dc.typeBook chapterpl_PL
dc.page.number51-68pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationBolu Abant Izzet Baysal Universitypl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn978-83-8142-288-8
dc.referencesAmerican Institute in Taiwan 1979, Taiwan Relations Act, January 1, viewed April 12, 2017, http://www.ait.org.tw/en/taiwan-relations-act.html.pl_PL
dc.referencesBrosnan, E. 2016, “Taiwan Resists Hague-Based Tribunal’s South China Sea Ruling”, The Washington Times, July 14, viewed July 29, 2017, http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/14/taiwan-resists-hague-based-tribunals-south-china-s/.pl_PL
dc.referencesBush, R. 2016, Taiwan’s January 2016 Elections and Their Implications for Relations for Relations with China and the United States, Asia Working Group, Brookings, viewed May 20, 2017, https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/taiwan-elections-china-us-implications-bush.pdf.pl_PL
dc.referencesCampbell, K. and Andrews, B. 2013, Explaining the US ‘Pivot’ to Asia, August, Chatham House, London.pl_PL
dc.referencesThe China Post 2016, “US Reiterates Hope for Cross-Strait Relations to Remain Peaceful,” January 23, viewed July 27, 2017, http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/foreign-affairs/2016/01/23/456825/us-reiterates.htm.pl_PL
dc.referencesThe China Post 2017, “Could US Troops Move from Okinawa to Taiwan?” January 25, viewed July 30, 2017, http://www.chinapost.com.tw/editorial/detail.asp?id=490279&grp=’I’.pl_PL
dc.referencesChubb, A. 2014, “China-Vietnam Clash in the Paracels: History still Rhyming in the Internet Era?”, southseaconversations, May 7, viewed July 29, 2017, https://southseaconversations.wordpress.com/2014/05/07/china-vietnam-clash-in-the-paracelshistory-still-rhyming-in-the-internet-era/.pl_PL
dc.referencesDenlinger, P. 2014, Why is the 1992 Consensus so Important for Beijing and Taipei?, Quora, viewed April 20, 2017, http://www.slate.com/blogs/quora/2014/12/26/_1992_consensus_why_is_the_agreement_important_to_beijing_and_taipei.html.pl_PL
dc.referencesExecutive Yuan 2016, “Cross-Strait Relations,” Republic of China Yearbook 2016, viewed April 22, 2017, http://english.ey.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=5072E16FB9A9A759.pl_PL
dc.referencesFocus Taiwan News Channel 2016, “Full Text of President Tsai’s Inaugural Address,” http://focustaiwan.tw/news/aipl/201605200008.aspx.pl_PL
dc.referencesGlaser, B.S. 2016, Tsai Ing-wen and DPP Will Win Big in Taiwan, CSCI, viewed April 20, 2017, https://www.csis.org/analysis/tsai-ing-wen-and-dpp-win-big-taiwan.pl_PL
dc.referencesGray, A. and Navarro, P. 7 November 2016, “Donald Trump’s Peace through Strength Vision for the Asia-Pacific,” Foreign Policy, viewed July 28, 2017, http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/11/07/donald-trumps-peace-through-strength-vision-for-the-asiapacific/.pl_PL
dc.referencesGriffin, N. 2014, Ping-Pong Diplomacy: The Secret History behind the Game that Changed the World, Simon&Schuster, London.pl_PL
dc.referencesThe Guardian 2016, “Trump’s Phone Call with Taiwan President Risks China’s Wrath,” December 3, viewed July 27, 2017, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/03/trump-angers-beijing-with-provocative-phone-call-to-taiwan-president.pl_PL
dc.referencesHarrison, M. 2012, “Cross-Strait Relations”, The China Story’, viewed May 26, 2017, https://www.thechinastory.org/yearbooks/yearbook-2012/cross-straits-relations/.pl_PL
dc.referencesHioe, B. 2016, “What Does Trump’s Presidency Mean for Taiwan and the Asia-Pacific?,” New Bloom, November 9, viewed July 29, 2017, http://newbloommag.net/2016/11/09/trump-taiwan-presidency/.pl_PL
dc.referencesJennings, R. 2017, “After Panama, Who’s Next to Cut Ties with Taiwan in Favor of China?,” Forbes, June 13, viewed July 21, 2017, https://www.forbes.com/sites/ralphjennings/2017/06/13/after-china-grabs-a-key-diplomatic-ally-to-spite-taiwan-hereswho-falls-next/#337cfb3e45eepl_PL
dc.referencesJennings, R. September 28, 2016, “UN Aviation Agency Rejects Taiwan: Here’s Why It Matters,” Forbes, viewed July 21, 2017, https://www.forbes.com/sites/ralphjennings/2016/09/28/un-aviation-agency-rejects-taiwan-3-losses/#2302c3b93c72.pl_PL
dc.referencesJennings, R. April 29, 2017, Why These Millions of Chinese Still Like Taiwan Despite Poor Relations, Forbes, viewed May 25, 2017, https://www.forbes.com/sites/ralphjennings/2017/04/29/why-these-millions-of-chinese-still-like-taiwan-despite-poor-relations/#7dad0aa17124.pl_PL
dc.referencesJennings, R. March 6, 2017, Taiwan Risks Beijing Backlash Over South China Sea Patrols, Voanews, viewed July 29, 2017, https://www.voanews.com/a/taiwan-risks-beijingbacklash-south-china-sea-patrols/3751147.html.pl_PL
dc.referencesKasım, K. 2015, “Turkey-Taiwan Relations in the Context of Turkey’s Asia Pacific Policy,” Uluslararası İlişkiler/International Relations, vol. 12, no. 45, pp. 83–100.pl_PL
dc.referencesKasım, K. 2017, “The impact of the US Rebalancing Policy toward Asia Pacific on International Relations in the region,” in: Kamiński T. (ed.), Overcoming Controversies in East Asia, Lodz University Press, pp. 175–190.pl_PL
dc.referencesKasım, K. and Eren Kasım, E. 2017, “Taiwan-Cyprus-Kosovo Cases: Differences and Similarities,” Journal of Administrative Sciences/Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 15, no. 30, pp. 553–572.pl_PL
dc.referencesLin, S.S. 2013, “National Identity, Economic Interdependence and Taiwan’s Cross-Strait Policy, The Case of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement,” in: Weixing H. (ed.), New Dynamics in Cross-Taiwan Strait Relations, How Far Can the Rapprochement Go?, Routledge, London, New York, pp. 31–47.pl_PL
dc.referencesLofther, W. 2012, “US Pay Tribute to Six Assurances,” Taipei Times, July 15, http://www.taipeitimes. com/News/taiwan/archives/2012/07/15/2003537795, viewed April 12, 2017.pl_PL
dc.referencesLofther, W. 2012, “US Pay Tribute to Six Assurances,” Taipei Times, July 15, http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2012/07/15/2003537795, viewed April 12, 2017.pl_PL
dc.referencesMinistry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China 2015, “Statement on the South China Sea,” July 7, http://www.mofa.gov.tw/en/News_Content.aspx?n=1EADDCFD4C6EC567&s=EDEBCA08C7F51C98.pl_PL
dc.referencesRamzy, A. 2016, “China Resumes Diplomatic Relations with Gambia, Shutting Out Taiwan,” The New York Times, March 18, viewed June 25, 2017, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/19/world/asia/china-gambia-taiwan-diplomatic-relations.html?mcubz=0.pl_PL
dc.referencesRomberg, A.D. 2016, The 1992 Consensus Adopting to the Future?, viewed April 12, 2017, http://www.hoover.org/sites/default/files/clm49ar.pdf.pl_PL
dc.referencesSantos, M. 2016, “Philippines Wins Arbitration Case vs China over South China Sea,” July 12, viewed September 1, 2016, http://globalnation.inquirer.net/140358/philippines-arbitration-decision-maritime-dispute-south-china-sea-arbitral-tribunal-unclos-itlos.pl_PL
dc.referencesSingh, K.P. 2016, Assessing Power Transition in Taiwan: From KMT to DPP, IDSA Comment, viewed May 18, 2017, http://www.idsa.in/idsacomments/assessing-power-transition-in-taiwan-kmt-to-dpp_pksingh_010616.pl_PL
dc.referencesSong, Yann-huei 2016, “Will Others Respect Precedent Set in the Philippines’ Case?,” March 24, viewed July 29, 2017, http://amti.csis.org/will-others-respect-precedent-set-philippines-case/.pl_PL
dc.referencesStatement of Foreign Press Liaison Office, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China (Taiwan), December 26, 2016.pl_PL
dc.referencesStatement of Foreign Press Liaison Office, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China (Taiwan), May 22, 2017, viewed May 23, 2017, http://english.president.gov.tw/Default.aspx?tabid=491&itemid=39239&rmid=2355.pl_PL
dc.referencesTaiwan’s MOFA Web Site, http://www.mofa.gov.tw/en/News_Content.aspx?n=1EADDCFD4C6EC567&s=EDEBCA08C7F51C98, viewed July 29, 2017.pl_PL
dc.referencesTaiwan Today 2016, “Tsai Ing-wen Wins 2016 ROC Presidential Elections,” January 17, viewed April 20, 2017, http://taiwantoday.tw/news.php?unit=179&post=3819.pl_PL
dc.referencesTiezzi, S. 2015, “Taiwan’s South China Sea Headache,” The Diplomat, November 4, viewed 29 July 2017, http://thediplomat.com/2015/11/taiwans-south-china-sea-headache/.pl_PL
dc.referencesTiezzi, S. 2016, “How Will Mainland China Respond to Taiwan’s Elections?” The Diplomat, January 21, viewed 25 May 2017, http://thediplomat.com/2016/01/how-willmainland-china-respond-to-taiwans-elections/.pl_PL
dc.referencesTung, C. 2016, “Taiwan’s New Political Landscape after the January Presidential Elections and Its International Consequences,” Observatoire Chine, viewed April 28, 2017, www.defense.gouv.fr/content/.../CHINE201601-TR8.pdf.pl_PL
dc.referencesWu, J. 2004, “Independence is the real Status quo,” Taipei Times, 6 January.pl_PL
dc.referencesWei, L. 2017, “Is the 1992 Consensus a Fantasy?” Taipei Times, June 28, viewed May 20, 2017, http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2017/06/28/2003673435/1.pl_PL
dc.referencesXinhuanet 2017, “Cross-Strait trade down 4.5 pct in 2016,” February 4, viewed, May 24, 2017, http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2017-02/04/c_136031643.htm.pl_PL
dc.referencesYeh, J. 2017, “Could Taiwan be up Next in THAAD Trouble,” The China Post, March 10, viewed July 30, 2017, http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/analysis/2017/03/10/493244/could-taiwan.htm.pl_PL
dc.referencesZen, L. 2017, “For Trump, One China, Like Everything, Is Negotiable,” South China Morning Post, January 14, http://www.scmp.com/news/world/united-states-canada/article/2062180/trump-will-not-commit-one-china-policy-if-beijing.pl_PL
dc.referencesZeng, W. 2016, “Tsai Ing-wen and the Need to balance Cross-Strait Relations,” Foreign Policy Association, October 11, viewed 18 April 2017, https://foreignpolicyblogs.com/2016/10/11/tsai-ing-wen-cross-strait-relations/.pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/8142-287-1.03


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe