Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRobinson, Laura
dc.contributor.authorSchulz, Jeremy
dc.contributor.authorBlank, Grant
dc.contributor.authorRagnedda, Massimo
dc.contributor.authorOno, Hiroshi
dc.contributor.authorHogan, Bernie
dc.contributor.authorMesch, Gustavo
dc.contributor.authorCotten, Shelia R.
dc.contributor.authorKretchmer, Susan B.
dc.contributor.authorHale, Timothy M.
dc.contributor.authorYan, Pu
dc.contributor.authorWellman, Barry
dc.contributor.authorHarper, Molly-Gloria
dc.contributor.authorQuan-Haase, Anabel
dc.contributor.authorDunn, Hopeton S.
dc.contributor.authorCasilli, Antonio A.
dc.contributor.authorTubaro, Paola
dc.contributor.authorCarveth, Rod
dc.contributor.authorChen, Wenhong
dc.contributor.authorWiest, Julie B.
dc.contributor.authorDodel, Matías
dc.contributor.authorStern, Michael J.
dc.contributor.authorBall, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Kuo-Ting
dc.contributor.authorKhilnani, Aneka
dc.contributor.authorDrabowicz, Tomasz
dc.contributor.editorValauskas, Edward J.
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-13T10:53:07Z
dc.date.available2020-07-13T10:53:07Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-06
dc.identifier.citationLaura Robinson, Jeremy Schulz, Grant Blank, Massimo Ragnedda, Hiroshi Ono, et al.. Digital inequalities 2.0: Legacy inequalities in the information age. First Monday, University of Illinois at Chicago Library, 2020, 25 (7), ⟨10.5210/fm.v25i7.10842⟩. ⟨halshs-02889893⟩pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn1396-0466
dc.identifier.otherhalshs-02889893, version 1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/32152
dc.descriptionWersja artykułu znajdująca się w innym repozytorium z wolnym dostępem. Oryginalny artykuł dostępny na licencji CC http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i7.10842pl_PL
dc.description.abstract2020 marks the 25th anniversary of the “digital divide.” Although a quarter century has passed, legacy digital inequalities continue, and emergent digital inequalities are proliferating. Many of the initial schisms identified in 1995 are still relevant today. Twenty-five years later, foundational access inequalities continue to separate the digital haves and the digital have-nots within and across countries. In addition, even ubiquitous-access populations are riven with skill inequalities and differentiated usage. Indeed, legacy digital inequalities persist vis-à-vis economic class, gender, sexuality, race and ethnicity, aging, disability, healthcare, education, rural residency, networks, and global geographies. At the same time, emergent forms of inequality now appear alongside legacy inequalities such that notions of digital inequalities must be continually expanded to become more nuanced. We capture the increasingly complex and interrelated nature of digital inequalities by introducing the concept of the “digital inequality stack.” The concept of the digital inequality stack encompasses access to connectivity networks, devices, and software, as well as collective access to network infrastructure. Other layers of the digital inequality stack include differentiated use and consumption, literacies and skills, production and programming, etc. When inequality exists at foundational layers of the digital inequality stack, this often translates into inequalities at higher levels. As we show across these many thematic foci, layers in the digital inequality stack may move in tandem with one another such that all layers of the digital inequality stack reinforce disadvantage.pl_PL
dc.language.isoen_USpl_PL
dc.publisherUniversity of Illinois at Chicago Librarypl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFirst Monday;7
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectdigital dividepl_PL
dc.subjectdigital inequalitypl_PL
dc.subjectsocial classpl_PL
dc.subjecteducationpl_PL
dc.subjectagepl_PL
dc.subjectdisabilitypl_PL
dc.titleDigital inequalities 2.0: Legacy inequalities in the information agepl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number1-23pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationKatedra Socjologii Struktur i Zmian Społecznych, Wydział Ekonomiczno-Socjologiczny, Uniwersytet Łódzkipl_PL
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteChair of the Department of Sociology of Social Structure and Social Change in the Faculty of Economics and Sociology, University of Lodzpl_PL
dc.referencesM. Aitken, B. Clancy, and D. Nass, 2017. “The growing value of digital health,” IQVIA Institute (7 November), at https://www.iqvia.com/insights/the-iqvia-institute/reports/the-growing-value-of-digital-health, accessed 16 June 2020pl_PL
dc.referencesM. Anderson and M. Kumar, 2019. “Digital divide persists even as lower-income Americans make gains in tech adoption,” Pew Research Center (7 May), at https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/05/07/digitaldivide-persists-even-as-lower-income-americans-make-gains-in-tech-adoption/, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesM. Anderson and A. Perrin, 2017. “Tech adoption climbs among older adults,” Pew Research Center (17 May), at https://www.pewinternet.org/2017/05/17/tech-adoption-climbs-among-older-adults/, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesP. Attewell, 2001. “Comment: The first and second digital divides,” Sociology of Education, volume 74, number 3, pp. 252–259. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2673277, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesC. Ball, K.-T. Huang, R.V. Rikard, and S.R. Cotten, 2019. “The emotional costs of computers: An expectancyvalue theory analysis of predominantly low-socioeconomic status minority students’ STEM attitudes,” Information, Communication & Society, volume 22, number 1, pp. 105–128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1355403, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesC. Ball, K.-T. Huang, S.R. Cotten, and R.V. Rikard, 2018. “Gaming the SySTEM: The relationship between video games and the digital and STEM divides,” Games and Culture, volume 15, number 5, pp. 501–528. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412018812513, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesC. Ball, K.-T. Huang, S.R. Cotten, and R.V. Rikard, 2017. “Pressurizing the STEM pipeline: An expectancy-value theory analysis of youths’ STEM attitudes,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, volume 26, number 4, pp. 372–382. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9685-1, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesS. Bates, 2017. “Revenge porn and mental health: A qualitative analysis of the mental health effects of revenge porn on female survivors,” Feminist Criminology, volume 12, number 1, pp. 22–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085116654565, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesM.H. Baturay and S. Toker, 2015. “An investigation of the impact of demographics on cyberloafing from an educational setting angle,” Computers in Human Behavior, volume 50, number 1, pp. 358–366. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.081, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesR.W. Berkowsky, R.V. Rikard, and S.R. Cotten, 2015. “Signing off: Predicting discontinued ICT usage among older adults in assisted and independent living: A survival analysis,” In: J. Zhou and G. Salvendy (editors). Human aspects of IT for the aged population. Design for everyday life. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 9194. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 389–398. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20913-5_36, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesT.P.G. Bertrand and J.M. Fidele, 2016. “Digital divides in Sub-Saharan Africa: Gender issues and evidence from Cameroon,” African Review of Economics and Finance, volume 8, number 2, pp. 201–233, at https://www.ajol.info/index.php/aref/article/view/162161, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesC. Blackwell, J. Birnholtz, and C. and Abbott, 2015. “Seeing and being seen: Co-situation and impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app,” New Media & Society, volume 17, number 7, pp. 1,117–1,136. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814521595, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesP. Blanck, 2014. “The struggle for Web eQuality by persons with cognitive disabilities,” Behavioral Sciences & the Law, volume 32, number 1, pp. 4–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2101, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesT. Boas, T. Dunning, and J. Bussell, 2005. “Will the digital revolution revolutionize development? Drawing together the debate,” Studies in Comparative International Development, volume 40, number 2, pp. 95–110; version at https://gspp.berkeley.edu/research/selected-publications/will-the-digital-revolution-revolutionizedevelopment-drawing-together-the, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesH. Bonfadelli, 2002. “The Internet and knowledge gaps: A theoretical and empirical investigation,” European Journal of Communication, volume 17, number 1, pp. 65–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323102017001607, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesP. Bourdieu, 1986. “The forms of capital,” In: J. Richardson (editor). Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood, pp. 241–258.pl_PL
dc.referencesE.E. Bruch and M.E.J. Newman, 2018. “Aspirational pursuit of mates in online dating markets,” Science Advances, volume 4, number 8, eaap9815. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aap9815, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesR.S. Burt, 2001. “Structural holes versus network closure as social capital,” In: N. Lin, K.S. Cook, and R.S. Burt (editors). Social capital: Theory and research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, pp. 31–55.pl_PL
dc.referencesC. Campos-Castillo, 2015. “Revisiting the first-level digital divide in the United States: Gender and race/ethnicity patterns, 2007–2012,” Social Science Computer Review, volume 33, number 4, pp. 423–439. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314547617, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesM. Castells, 1996. The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.pl_PL
dc.referencesW. Chen, 2013. “The implications of social capital for the digital divides in America,” Information Society, volume 29, number 1, pp. 13–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2012.739265, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesW. Chen and B. Wellman, 2004. “The global digital divide — within and between countries,” IT & Society, volume 1, number 7, pp. 39–45.pl_PL
dc.referencesC.-H. Chao and Y.-H. Tao, 2012. “Human flesh search: A supplemental review,” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, volume 15, number 7, pp. 350–356. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0481, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesD.P. Cingel and E. Hargittai, 2018. “The relationship between childhood rules about technology use and laterlife academic achievement among young adults,” Communication Review, volume 21, number 2, pp. 131–152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2018.1468182, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesS.R. Cotten, forthcoming. “Technologies and aging: Understanding use, impacts, and future needs,” In: K.F. Ferraro and D. Carr.(editors). Handbook of aging and the social sciences. Ninth edition. New York: Elsevier.pl_PL
dc.referencesS.R. Cotten, 2001. “Implications of Internet technology for medical sociology in the new millennium,” Sociological Spectrum, volume 21, number 3, pp. 319–340. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/027321701300202019, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesS.R. Cotten, E.A. Yost, R.W. Berkowsky, V. Winstead, and W.A. Anderson, 2017. Designing technology training for older adults in continuing care retirement communities. Boca Raton, Fla.: CRC Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesS.R. Cotten and S.S. Gupta, 2004. “Characteristics of online and offline health information seekers and factors that discriminate between them,” Social Science & Medicine, volume 59, number 9, pp. 1,795–1,806. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.020, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesP. DiMaggio and F. Garip, 2012. “Network effects and social inequality,” Annual Review of Sociology, volume 38, pp. 93–118. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102545, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesP. DiMaggio, E. Hargittai, C. Celeste, and S. Shafer, 2004. “Digital inequality: From unequal access to differentiated use,” In: K. Neckerman (editor). Social inequality. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 355– 400.pl_PL
dc.referencesT.A. DiPrete, A. Gelman, T. McCormick, J. Teitler, and T. Zheng, 2011. “Segregation in social networks based on acquaintanceship and trust,” American Journal of Sociology, volume 116, number 4, pp. 1,234–1,283. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/659100, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesC.M. Donner, 2016. “The gender gap and cybercrime: An examination of college students’ online offending,” Victims & Offenders, volume 11, number 4, pp. 556–577. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2016.1173157, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesT. Drabowicz, 2017. “Social theory of Internet use: Corroboration or rejection among the digital natives? Correspondence analysis of adolescents in two societies,” Computers & Education, volume 105, pp. 57–67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.004, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesT. Drabowicz, 2014. “Gender and digital usage inequality among adolescents: A comparative study of 39 countries,” Computers & Education, volume 74, pp. 98–111. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.016, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesS. Duguay, 2016. “‘He has a way gayer Facebook than I do’: Investigating sexual identity disclosure and context collapse on a social networking site,” New Media & Society, volume 18, number 6, pp. 891–907. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814549930, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesW.H. Dutton, E.J. Helsper, M.T. Whitty, N. Li, J.G. Buckwalter, and E. Lee, 2009. “The role of the Internet in reconfiguring marriages: A cross-national study,” Interpersona, volume 3, supplement 2, pp. 3–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v3isupp2.73, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesR. Eynon, 2009. “Mapping the digital divide in Britain: Implications for learning and education,” Learning, Media and Technology, volume 34, number 4, pp. 277–290. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880903345874, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesM.L. Fang, S.L. Canham, L. Battersby, J. Sixsmith, M. Wada, and A. Sixsmith, 2019. “Exploring privilege in the digital divide: Implications for theory, policy, and practice,” Gerontologist, volume 59, number 1, pp. e1–e15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny037, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesC.S. Fischer, 1982. To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesJ. Francis, T. Kadylak, T.W. Makki, R.V. Rikard, and S.R. Cotten, 2018. “Catalyst to connection: When technical difficulties lead to social support for older adults,” American Behavioral Scientist, volume 62, number 9, pp. 1,167–1,185. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218773829, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesC. Fuchs and E. Horak, 2008. “Africa and the digital divide,” Telematics and Informatics, volume 25, number 2, pp. 99–116. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2006.06.004, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesI. Gershon, 2010. The breakup 2.0: Disconnecting over new media. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesT.J. Gray, J. Gainous, and K.M. Wagner, 2017. “Gender and the digital divide in Latin America,” Social Science Quarterly, volume 98, number 1, pp. 326–340. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12270, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesJ.C. Gulek and H. Demirtas, 2005. “Learning with technology: The impact of laptop use on student achievement,” Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, volume 3, number 2, pp. 1–39, and at https://ejournals.bc.edu/index.php/jtla/article/view/1655, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesT.M. Hale, W.-Y.S. Choi, and S.R. Cotten, 2018. eHealth: Current evidence, promises, perils and future directions. Studies in Media and Communications, volume 15. Bingley, West Yorkshire: Emerald Publishing.pl_PL
dc.referencesT.M. Hale, M. Goldner, M. Stern, P. Drentea, and S.R. Cotten, 2014. “Patterns of online health searching 2002– 2010: Implications for social capital, health disparities and the de-professionalization of medical knowledge,” In: J.J. Kronenfeld (editor). Technology, communication, disparities and government options in health and health care services. Research in the sociology of health care, volume 32, Bingley, West Yorkshire: Emerald Publishing pp. 35–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0275-495920140000032016, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesR. Hämäläinen, B. De Wever, A. Malin, and S. Cincinnato, 2015. “Education and working life: VET adults’ problem-solving skills in technology-rich environments,” Computers & Education, volume 88, pp. 38–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.013, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesK.N. Hampton and B. Wellman, 2018. “Lost and saved... again: The moral panic about the loss of community takes hold of social media,” Contemporary Sociology, volume 47, number 6, pp. 643–651. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306118805415, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesE.J. Helsper, 2014. “Offline social identity and online chat partner selection,” Information, Communication & Society, volume 17, number 6, pp. 695–715. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.810767, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesJ. Henry, Y. Pylypchuck, T. Searcy, and V. Patel, 2016. “Adoption of electronic health record systems among U.S. non-federal acute care hospitals: 2008–2015,” ONC Data Brief, number 35, at https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/briefs/2015_hospital_adoption_db_v17.pdf, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesD.L. Hoffman and T.P. Novak, 1998. “Bridging the racial divide on the Internet,” Science, volume 280, number 5362 (17 April), pp. 390–391. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5362.390, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesB. Hogan, 2018. “Break-ups and the limits of encoding love,” In: Z. Papacharissi (editor). A networked self and love. New York: Routledge, pp. 113–128.pl_PL
dc.referencesM.R. Hoque, Y. Bao, and G. Sorwar, 2017. “Investigating factors influencing the adoption of e-Health in developing countries: A patient’s perspective,” Informatics for Health and Social Care, volume 42, number 1, pp. 13–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/17538157.2015.1075541, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesK.-T. Huang, L. Robinson, and S.R. Cotten, 2015. “Mind the emotional gap: The impact of emotional costs on student learning outcomes,” Communication and Information Technologies Annual>, volume 10, pp. 121–144. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010005, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesL.A. Jackson, Y. Zhao, Y., A. Kolenic III,, H.E. Fitzgerald, R. Harold, and A. Von Eye, 2008. “Race, gender, and information technology use: The new digital divide,” CyberPsychology & Behavior, volume 11, number 4, pp. 437–442. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0157, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesP.T. Jaeger, 2011. Disability and the Internet: Confronting a digital divide. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers.pl_PL
dc.referencesH. Jenkins, K. Clinton, R. Purushotma, A.J. Robison, and M. Weigel, 2006. “Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century,” John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, at http://www.newmedialiteracies.org, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesM. Jiang, H.S. Tsai, S.R. Cotten, N.J. Rifon, R. LaRose, and S. Alhabash, 2016. “Generational differences in online safety perceptions, knowledge, and practices,” Journal of Educational Gerontology, volume 42, number 9, pp. 621–634. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2016.1205408, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesS. Judge, 2005. “The impact of computer technology on academic achievement of young African American children,” Journal of Research in Childhood Education, volume 20, number 2, pp. 91–101. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02568540509594554, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesS. Judge, K. Puckett, and S.M. Bell, 2006. “Closing the digital divide: Update from the early childhood longitudinal study,” Journal of Educational Research, volume 100, number 1, pp. 52–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.1.52-60, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesR. Junco and S.R. Cotten, 2012. “No A 4 U: The relationship between multitasking and academic performance,” Computers & Education, volume 59, number 2, pp. 505–514. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.023, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesR. Junco and S.R. Cotten, 2011. “Perceived academic effects of instant messaging use,” Computers & Education, volume 56, number 2, pp. 370–378. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.020, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesB. Kannan, S. Karthik, G.K. Pal, and V. Menon, 2019. “Gender variation in the prevalence of Internet addiction and impact of Internet addiction on reaction time and heart rate variability in medical college students,” Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research, volume 13, number 4, pp. 1–4.pl_PL
dc.referencesJ. Katz and P. Aspden, 1997. “Motivations for and barriers to Internet usage: Results of a national public opinion survey,” Internet Research, volume 7, number 3, pp. 170–188. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/10662249710171814, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesA. Khilnani, J. Schulz, and L. Robinson, 2020. “The COVID-19 pandemic: New concerns and connections between eHealth and digital inequalities,” Journal of Information, Communication & Ethics in Society. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-04-2020-0052, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesS.B. Kretchmer and T. Drabowicz, 2018. “Exploring the disability digital divide: Research that impacts interventions through policy and practice,” In: A. Shaw and D.T. Scott (editors). Interventions: Communication research and practice. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 143–166. doi: https://doi.org/10.3726/b13081, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesJ. Kvedar, M.J. Coye, and W. Everett, 2014. “Connected health: a review of technologies and strategies to improve patient care with telemedicine and telehealth,” Health Affairs, volume 33, number 2, pp. 194–199. doi: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0992, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesK. Latulippe, C. Hamel, and D. Giroux, 2017. “Social health inequalities and eHealth: A literature review with qualitative synthesis of theoretical and empirical studies,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, volume 19, number 4, e136. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6731, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesJ. LaViolette and B. Hogan, 2019. “Using platform signals for distinguishing discourses: The case of men’s rights and men’s liberation on Reddit,” Proceedings of the Thirteenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, volume 13, pp. 323–334, and at https://www.aaai.org/ojs/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/3357, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesJ. Lei and Y. Zhao, 2007. “Technology uses and student achievement: A longitudinal study,” Computers & Education, volume 49, number 2, pp. 284–296. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.013, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesR. Ling and H.A. Horst, 2011. “Mobile communication in the global south,” New Media & Society, volume 13, number 3, pp. 363–374. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810393899, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesS. Livingstone, G. Mascheroni, and E. Staksrud, 2018. “European research on childrens Internet use: Assessing the past and anticipating the future,” New Media & Society, volume 20, number 3, pp. 1,103–1,122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816685930https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816685930, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesM.P. Mahoney, 2010. “Students’ attitudes toward STEM: Development of an instrument for high school STEMbased programs,” Journal of Technology Studies, volume 36, number 1, pp. 24–34.pl_PL
dc.referencesE. McConnell, B. Néray, B. Hogan, A. Korpak, A. Clifford, and M. Birkett, 2018. “‘Everybody puts their whole life on Facebook’: Identity management and the online social networks of LGBTQ youth,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, volume 15, number 6, 1078. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061078, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesB. McNair, 2013. Porno? Chic! How pornography changed the world and made it a better place. New York: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesR.K. Merton, 1968. “The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered,” Science, volume 159, number 3810 (5 January), pp. 56–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesG.S. Mesch, 2018. “Race, ethnicity and the strength of Facebook ties,” Journal of Youth Studies, volume 21, number 5, pp. 575–589. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2017.1396303, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesG.S. Mesch, 2016. “Ethnic origin and access to electronic health services,” Health Informatics Journal, volume 22, number 4, pp. 791–803. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458215590863, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesG. Mesch, R. Mano, and J. Tsamir, 2012. “Minority status and health information search: A test of the social diversification hypothesis,” Social Science & Medicine, volume 75, number 5, pp. 854–858. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.03.024, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesU.A. Mitchell, P.G. Chebli, L. Ruggiero, and N. Muramatsu, 2019. “The digital divide in health-related technology use: The significance of race/ethnicity,” Gerontologist, volume 59, number 1, pp. 6–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny138, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesD. Mok, B. Wellman, and J. Carrasco, 2010. “Does distance matter in the age of the Internet?” Urban Studies, volume 47, number 13, pp. 2,747–2,783. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010377363, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesS. Moller, N. Banerjee, M.C. Bottia, E. Stearns, R.A. Mickelson, M. Dancy, and L. Valentino, 2015. “Moving Latino/a students into STEM majors in college: The role of teachers and professional communities in secondary schools,” Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, volume 14, number 1, pp. 3–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192714540533, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesE.M. Morgan, 2011. “Associations between young adults’ use of sexually explicit materials and their sexual preferences, behaviors, and satisfaction,” Journal of Sex Research, volume 48, number 6, pp. 520–530. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2010.543960, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesD. Nemer, 2015. “From digital divide to digital inclusion and beyond,” Journal of Community Informatics, volume 11, number 1, at http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/1030, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesG. Nimrod, 2018. “Technostress: Measuring a new threat to well-being in later life,” Aging & Mental Health, volume 22, number 8, pp. 1,086–1,093. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2017.1334037, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesP. Norris, 2001. Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesA.M. Norton, J. Baptist, and B. Hogan, 2018. “Computermediated communication in intimate relationships: Associations of boundary crossing, intrusion, relationship satisfaction, and partner responsiveness,” Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, volume 44, number 1, pp. 165–182. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12246, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesE. Oreglia, 2015. “The ‘sent-down’ Internet: Using information and communication technologies in rural China,” Chinese Journal of Communication, volume 8, number 1, pp. 1–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2015.991369, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesE. Oreglia, 2013. “From farm to Farmville: Circulation, adoption, and use of ICT between urban and rural China,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, at https://escholarship.org/uc/item/68s0x1r3, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesOrganisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2018. “Bridging the digital gender divide: Include, upskill, innovate,” at http://www.oecd.org/internet/bridging-the-digital-gender-divide.pdf, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesH. Ono and M. Zavodny, 2007. “Digital inequality: A five country comparison using microdata,” Social Science Research, volume 36, number 3, pp. 1,135–1,155. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.09.001, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesH. Ono and M. Zavodny, 2003. “Gender and the Internet,” Social Science Quarterly, volume 84, number 1, pp. 111–121. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.t01-1-8401007, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesE.J. Pérez-Stable, B. Jean-Francois, and C.F. Aklin, 2019. “Leveraging advances in technology to promote health equity,” Medical Care, volume 57, pp. S101–S103. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001112, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesJ. Peter and P.M. Valkenburg, 2006. “Adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit material on the Internet,” Communication Research, volume 33, number 2, pp. 178–204. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650205285369, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesJ.C. Phelan, B.G. Link, and P. Tehranifar, 2010. “Social conditions as fundamental causes of health inequalities: Theory, evidence, and policy implications,” Journal of Health and Social Behavior, volume 51, supplement 1, pp. S28–S40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510383498, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesA. Quan-Haase, H. Wang, B. Wellman, and A. Zhang, 2018. “Weaving family connections on and offline: The turn to networked individualism,” In: B.B. Neves and C. Casimiro (editors). Connecting families? Information & communication technologies, generations, and The life course. Bristol: Policy Press University of Bristol, pp. 57– 77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447339946.003.0004, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesD. Radcliffe, 2018. “Mobile in sub-Saharan Africa: Can world’s fastest-growing mobile region keep it up?” ZDNet (16 October), at https://www.zdnet.com/article/mobile-in-sub-saharan-africa-can-worlds-fastest-growingmobile-region-keep-it-up/, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesM. Ragnedda, 2018. “Conceptualizing digital capital,” Telematics and Informatics, volume 35, number 8, pp. 2,366–2,375. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.10.006, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesM. Ragnedda, 2017. The third digital divide: A Weberian approach to digital inequalities. New York: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesM. Ragnedda and G.W. Muschert (editors), 2013. The digital divide: The Internet and social inequality in international perspective. New York: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesM. Ragnedda, M.L. Ruiu, and F. Addeo, 2020. “Measuring digital capital: An empirical investigation,” New Media & Society, volume 22, number 5, pp. 793–816. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819869604, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesL. Rainie and B. Wellman, 2012. Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesL. Robinson, 2020. “The STEM selfing process: Nondigital and digital determinants of aspirational STEM futures,” American Behavioral Scientist (4 June). doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220919150, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesL. Robinson, 2012. “Information-seeking 2.0: The effects of informational advantage,” RESET: Recherches en Sciences Sociales sur Internet, at https://journals.openedition.org/reset/135, accessed 16 June 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.4000/reset.135, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesL. Robinson and J. Schulz, 2013. “Net time negotiations within the family,” Information, Communication & Society, volume 16, number 4, pp. 542–560. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.777761, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesL. Robinson, Ø. Wiborg, and J. Schulz, 2018. “Interlocking inequalities: Digital stratification meets academic stratification,” American Behavioral Scientist, volume 62, number 9, pp. 1,251–1,272. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218773826, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesL. Robinson, J. Schulz, M. Dodel, T. Correa, E. Villanueva-Mansilla, S. Leal, C. Magallanes-Blanco, L. RodriguezMedina, H.S. Dunn, L. Levine, R. McMahon, and A. Khilnani, 2020. “Digital inclusion across the Americas and Caribbean,” Social Inclusion, volume 8, number 2, pp. 244–259. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i2.2632, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesA. Rosenmann and M.P. Safir, 2006. “Forced online: Push factors of Internet sexuality: A preliminary study of online paraphilic empowerment,” Journal of Homosexuality, volume 51, number 3, pp. 71–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v51n03_05, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesN. Selwyn, 2005. “The social processes of learning to use computers,” Social Science Computer Review, volume 23, number 1, pp. 122–135. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439304271553, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesŁ. Szulc and A. Dhoest, 2013. “The Internet and sexual identity formation: Comparing Internet use before and after coming out,” Communications, volume 38, number 4, pp. 347–365. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2013-0021, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesS. Taipale, 2013. “The relationship between Internet use, online and printed newspaper reading in Finland: Investigating the direct and moderating effects of gender,” European Journal of Communication, volume 28, number 1, pp. 5–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112453672, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesM. Tarafdar, Q. Tu, B.S. Ragu-Nathan, and T.S. Ragu-Nathan, 2007. “The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity,” Journal of Management Information Systems, volume 24, number 1, pp. 301–328. doi: https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesP.J. Tichenor, G.A. Donohue, and C.N. Olien, 1970. “Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge,” Public Opinion Quarterly, volume 34, number 2, pp. 159–170. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/267786, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesU.S. Census Bureau, 2001–2017. “Current population survey,” at https://www.census.gov/programssurveys/cps.html, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesA.J.A.M. van Deursen and J.A.G.M. van Dijk, 2019. “The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access,” New Media & Society, volume 21, number 2, pp. 354–375. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797082, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesA.J.A.M. van Deursen and E.J. Helsper, 2015. “The third-level digital divide: Who benefits most from being online?” Communication and Information Technologies Annual, volume 10, pp. 29–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesA.J.A.M. van Deursen and J.A.G.M. van Dijk, 2014. “The digital divide shifts to differences in usage,“ New Media & Society, volume 16, number 3, pp. 507–526. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487959, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesWorld Bank, 2020. “Disability inclusion” (15 May), at https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/disability, accessed 16 June 2020.pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailtomasz.drabowicz@uni.lodz.plpl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.5210/fm.v25i7.10842
dc.relation.volume25pl_PL
dc.disciplinenauki socjologicznepl_PL


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe