Route verbs in English and Polish expressions of fictive motion

Waliński, Jacek

dc.contributor.author	Waliński, Jacek
dc.contributor.editor	Badio, Janusz
dc.date.accessioned	2021-02-01T11:55:03Z
dc.date.available	2021-02-01T11:55:03Z
dc.date.issued	2020
dc.identifier.citation	Waliński, J. (2020). Route verbs in English and Polish expressions of fictive motion. In. J. Badio (Ed.),Focus on events and narratives in language, psychology, social and medical practice, (pp. 115-126). Łódź: WUŁ, http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/8220-051-5.10	pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn	978-83-8220-051-5
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11089/33257
dc.description.abstract	This study discusses the use of route verbs in English and Polish expressions of fictive motion. It demonstrates that while in English the verbs cross and pass, which are prototypically used to express routing relations, can be used in most scenarios interchangeably, their Polish equivalents used in this context cannot always replace one another. This indicates that, despite sharing certain common properties, fictive motion expressions in English and Polish are highly conventionalized and subject to interactions between conceptual motivations and language specific semantic constraints.	pl_PL
dc.language.iso	en	pl_PL
dc.publisher	Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego	pl_PL
dc.relation.ispartof	Focus on events and narratives in language, psychology, social and medical practice;
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Łódzkie Studia z Językoznawstwa Angielskiego i Ogólnego;9
dc.rights	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/	*
dc.subject	motion events	pl_PL
dc.subject	fictive motion	pl_PL
dc.subject	motion verbs	pl_PL
dc.subject	lexical semantics	pl_PL
dc.subject	routes	pl_PL
dc.title	Route verbs in English and Polish expressions of fictive motion	pl_PL
dc.type	Book chapter	pl_PL
dc.page.number	115-126	pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation	Uniwersytet Łódzki, Wydział Filologiczny	pl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn	978-83-8220-052-2
dc.references	Beavers, J. (2008). Scalar complexity and the structure of events. In J. Dölling, T. Heyde-Zybatow, & M. Schäfer (Eds.), Event Structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation, (pp. 245–265). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.	pl_PL
dc.references	Biber, D. & Reppen, R. (Eds.). (2015). The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Blomberg, J. (2015). The expression of non-actual motion in Swedish, French and Thai. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(4), 657–696.	pl_PL
dc.references	Burnard, L. (Ed.). (2000). Reference Guide for the British National Corpus (World Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Computing Services.	pl_PL
dc.references	Dancygier, B. (Ed.). (2017). The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.	pl_PL
dc.references	Fellbaum, C. (2017). WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Resource. In S. E. F. Chipman (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Science, (pp. 301–314). Oxford: Oxford University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Fisiak, J., Lipińska-Grzegorek, M., & Zabrocki, T. (1987). An Introductory English-Polish Contrastive Grammar, 2nd Ed. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.	pl_PL
dc.references	Frege, G. (1892/1960). On Sense and Reference [Originally published as Über Sinn und Bedeutung in 1892]. In P. Geach & M. Black (Eds.), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, 2nd Ed., (pp. 56–78). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.	pl_PL
dc.references	Geuder, W. & Weisgerber, M. (2008). Manner of Movement and the Conceptualization of Force. Slides presented at the Journée d’étude “Il y a maniere et maniere,” Université d’Artois, Arras.	pl_PL
dc.references	Głaz, A. (2014). When -ities collide: Virtuality, actuality, reality. In K. Rudnicka-Szozda & A. Szwedek (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics in the Making, (pp. 77–88). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.	pl_PL
dc.references	Gries, S. T. & Divjak, D. (2010). Quantitative approaches in usage-based Cognitive Semantics: Myths, erroneous assumptions, and a proposal. In D. Glynn & K. Fischer (Eds.), Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-Driven Approaches, (pp. 333–353). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.	pl_PL
dc.references	Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where Metaphors Come from: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. New York: Oxford University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. (1989). More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Langacker, R. W. (1986). Abstract Motion. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, (pp. 455–471). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.	pl_PL
dc.references	Langacker, R. W. (1999). Virtual reality. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 29(2), 77–103.	pl_PL
dc.references	Langacker, R. W. (2005). Dynamicity, fictivity, and scanning: The imaginative basis of logic and linguistic meaning. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking, (pp. 164–197). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Levin, B. (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Matlock, T. (2004b). The conceptual motivation of fictive motion. In G. Radden & K.-U. Panther (Eds.), Studies in Linguistic Motivation, (pp. 221–248). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.	pl_PL
dc.references	Matsumoto, Y. (1996). Subjective motion and English and Japanese verbs. Cognitive Linguistics, 7(2), 183–226.	pl_PL
dc.references	Papafragou, A., & Selimis, S. (2010). Event categorisation and language: A cross-linguistic study of motion. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(2), 224–260.	pl_PL
dc.references	Piasecki, M., Broda, B., & Szpakowicz, S. (2009). A Wordnet from the Ground Up. Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej.	pl_PL
dc.references	Przepiórkowski, A., Bańko, M., Górski, R. L., & Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (Eds.). (2012). Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.	pl_PL
dc.references	Rappaport Hovav, M. & Levin, B. (2010). Reflections on manner/result complementarity. In M. Rappaport Hovav, E. Doron, & I. Sichel (Eds.), Lexical Semantics, Syntax, and Event Structure, (pp. 21–38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Slobin, D. I. (1996). Two Ways to Travel: Verbs of Motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning, (pp. 195–219). Oxford: Oxford University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Stosic, D., Fagard, B., Sarda, L., & Colin, C. (2015). Does the road go up the mountain? Fictive motion between linguistic conventions and cognitive motivations. Cognitive Processing, 16 (S1), 221–225.	pl_PL
dc.references	Talmy, L. (1983). How language structures space. In H. L. Pick & L. P. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research, and Application, (pp. 225–282). New York: Plenum Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Talmy, L. (1996). Fictive Motion in Language and “Ception.” In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and Space, (pp. 211–276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. I: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Talmy, L. (2011). Cognitive Semantics: An overview. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, (Vol. 1, pp. 622–642). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.	pl_PL
dc.references	Waliński, J. T. (2017). Relations of routing (cross and pass) in coextension paths in the British National Corpus (PELCRA Research Report No. 03/JTW/2017). Łódź: University of Łódź.	pl_PL
dc.references	Waliński, J. T. (2018). Verbs in Fictive Motion. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.	pl_PL
dc.references	Zwarts, J. (2008). Aspects of a typology of direction. In S. D. Rothstein (Ed.), Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect, (pp. 79–105). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.	pl_PL
dc.references	BNC. (2001). The British National Corpus [World Edition] Oxford: Oxford University Computing Services. Available from OUCS at: http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk	pl_PL
dc.references	The PWN-Oxford English-Polish and Polish-English Dictionary (2004). [CD-ROM]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.	pl_PL
dc.references	SłowoSieć Online Search 2.1. (2012). A lexical database for Polish with mappings between Polish WordNet and English [Princeton] WordNet. Wrocław: Wrocław University of Technology. Available at: plwordnet.pwr.wroc.pl	pl_PL
dc.references	WordNet Online Search 3.1. (2010). A lexical database for English. Princeton: Princeton University. Available at: http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn	pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi	10.18778/8220-051-5.10