Show simple item record

Categorization of directional motion verbs

dc.contributor.authorWaliński, Jacek
dc.contributor.editorBadio, Janusz
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-01T13:37:41Z
dc.date.available2021-02-01T13:37:41Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationWaliński, J. (2020). Categorization of directional motion verbs. In. J. Badio (Ed.), Categories and Units in Language and Linguistics, (pp. 161-173). Łódź–Kraków–Wałbrzych: WUŁ–Agent PR–Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Angelusa Silesiusa, http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/8142-988-7.14pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-8142-988-7
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/33269
dc.description.abstractThis study presents a proposal of categorization of directional motion verbs, i.e. ones whose lexical semantics specifies a direction of motion, even without an overt directional complementation. The categorization proposed here includes (1) source/goal verbs, which are used to refer to bounded paths; (2) unbounded path verbs, which can be divided into two subgroups of upward/downward verbs and forward/backward verbs; (3) route verbs, which include cross and pass; (4) constant verbs, which again can be divided into two subgroups of chase verbs and accompany verbs; (5) deictic verbs, namely come and go, which are approached as a separate class. The proposal originates from previous studies conducted to this end in semantics, and is meant to encourage discussion on further advancement in this area of linguistic studies.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofCategories and Units in Language and Linguistics;
dc.relation.ispartofseriesŁódzkie Studia z Językoznawstwa Angielskiego i Ogólnego;10
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectcategorizationpl_PL
dc.subjectmotion eventspl_PL
dc.subjectmotion verbspl_PL
dc.subjectlexical semanticspl_PL
dc.subjectdirectionalitypl_PL
dc.titleCategorization of directional motion verbspl_PL
dc.typeBook chapterpl_PL
dc.page.number161-173pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniwersytet Łódzki, Wydział Filologicznypl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn978-83-8142-989-4
dc.referencesAristotle. (350BC/1995b). Physics [written c. 350BC]. In J. Barnes (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle (Vol. 1). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBeavers, J. (2008). Scalar complexity and the structure of events. In J. Dölling, T. Heyde-Zybatow, & M. Schäfer (eds.), Event Structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation, (pp. 245–265). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesBeavers, J., Levin, B., & Wei Tham, S. (2010). The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 46(02), 331–377. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226709990272pl_PL
dc.referencesCarlson, G. N. (1984). Thematic roles and their role in semantic interpretation. Linguistics, 22(3), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1984.22.3.259pl_PL
dc.referencesChomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.pl_PL
dc.referencesDescartes, R. (1644/1985). Principles of Philosophy. In J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, & D. Murdoch (trans.), The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, (pp. 177–292). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFellbaum, C. (2017). WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Resource. In S. E. F. Chipman (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Science, (pp. 301–314). Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFilipović, L. (2007). Talking About Motion: A Crosslinguistic Investigation of Lexicalization Patterns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesFillmore, C. J. (1982). Towards a Descriptive Framework for Spatial Deixis. In R. J. Jarvella & W. Klein (eds.), Speech, Place, and Action: Studies of Deixis and Related Topics, (pp. 31–59). New York: John Wiley.pl_PL
dc.referencesFillmore, C. J. (1983). How to know whether you’re coming or going. In G. Rauh (ed.), Essays on Deixis, (pp. 219–227). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.pl_PL
dc.referencesGeuder, W., & Weisgerber, M. (2008). Manner of Movement and the Conceptualization of Force. Slides presented at the Journée d’étude “Il y a maniere et maniere,” Université d’Artois, Arras.pl_PL
dc.referencesGoddard, C. (1997). The semantics of coming and going. Pragmatics, 7(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.7.2.02godpl_PL
dc.referencesGoldberg, A. E. (2010). Verbs, Constructions, and Semantic Frames. In M. Rappaport Hovav, E. Doron, & I. Sichel (eds.), Lexical Semantics, Syntax, and Event Structure, (pp. 39–58). Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGoschler, J., & Stefanowitsch, A. (eds.). (2013). Variation and Change in the Encoding of Motion Events. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesGruber, J. S. (1976). Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics. Amsterdam: North Holland.pl_PL
dc.referencesJackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesJackendoff, R. (1985). Multiple subcategorization and the theta-criterion: The case of climb. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 3(3), 271–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154264pl_PL
dc.referencesLakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLakoff, G., & Núñez, R. E. (2000). Where Mathematics Comes from: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. New York: Basic Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesLevin, B. (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLevin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (1992). The lexical semantics of verbs of motion: The perspective from unaccusativity. In I. M. Roca (ed.), Thematic Structure. Berlin: De Gruyter.pl_PL
dc.referencesLevin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (2013). Lexicalized Meaning and Manner/Result Complementarity. In B. Arsenijević, B. Gehrke, & R. Marín (eds.), Studies in the Composition and Decomposition of Event Predicates, (pp. 49–70). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5983-1_3pl_PL
dc.referencesMani, I., & Pustejovsky, J. (2012). Interpreting Motion: Grounded Representations for Spatial Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMiller, G. A., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976). Language and Perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesPalmer, M., Bonial, C., & Hwang, J. D. (2017). VerbNet: Capturing English Verb Behavior, Meaning, and Usage. In S. E. F. Chipman (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Science (pp. 315–336). Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesRappaport Hovav, M., & Levin, B. (2010). Reflections on manner/result complementarity. In M. Rappaport Hovav, E. Doron, & I. Sichel (eds.), Lexical Semantics, Syntax, and Event Structure, (pp. 21–38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesRauh, G. (1981). On coming and going in English and German. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 13, 53–68.pl_PL
dc.referencesSampaio, W., Sinha, C., & Sinha, V. D. S. (2009). Mixing and mapping: Motion, path, and manner in Amondawa. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & Ş. Özçalişkan (eds.), Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp. 427–439). New York: Psychology Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSheets-Johnstone, M. (2011). The Primacy of Movement, Expanded 2nd Ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesTalmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon (pp. 57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesTalmy, L. (1991). Path to Realization: A Typology of Event Conflation. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, (pp. 480–519). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.pl_PL
dc.referencesTalmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. II: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesTesnière, L. (1959/2015). Elements of Structural Syntax [First published in 1959 as Éléments de syntaxe structurale]. (T. J. Osborne & S. Kahane, trans.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.referencesWaliński, J. T. (2018). Verbs in Fictive Motion. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. https://doi.org/10.18778/8142–382–3pl_PL
dc.referencesWilkins, D. P., & Hill, D. (1995). When ˝go˝ means ˝come˝: Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs. Cognitive Linguistics, 6(2–3), 209–260. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1995.6.2–3.209pl_PL
dc.referencesZwarts, J. (2008). Aspects of a typology of direction. In S. D. Rothstein (ed.), Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect, (pp. 79–105). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/8142-988-7.14


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
161-173-walinski.pdf
Size:
438.5Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Thumbnail
Name:
Badio_Categories&Units10_oklad ...
Size:
205.9Kb
Format:
JPEG image
View/Open
Thumbnail
Name:
license_rdf
Size:
805bytes
Format:
application/rdf+xml
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe