Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorAwal, Abdul
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-24T09:20:08Z
dc.date.available2022-01-24T09:20:08Z
dc.date.issued2021-09
dc.identifier.citationAwal. A (2021). Standard English in Bangladesh: A legacy of colonization. International Journal of Academic Multidisciplinary Research (IJAMR), 5(9), 122-128. Retrieved from http://ijeais.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/9/IJAMR210916.pdfpl_PL
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/40475
dc.description.abstractThe paper aims to reveal the debate of Standard English (SE) and Non-standard English from a sociolinguistics perspective in Bangladesh. The validity of so-called Standard English is examined in the light of post-colonial reaction linguistically. The legitimacy of accepting local verities of English as Global Englishes is investigated with due socio-political references. The myth and reality of Standard English in ELT (English Language Teaching) has priority in this paper and it reveals how so-called Standard English is associated with Linguistic Imperialism. The paper examines the sociolinguistic reality of English in Bangladesh from the perspective of 'My English (ME)', which is a linguistic revolt against Standard English (SE). It describes the saturation of English in various domains to understand the place of English in the local linguistic ecology in Bangladesh. Certain linguistic and non-linguistic factors are highlighted here, which may interrupt determining English variety status in Bangladesh. As education is a required field where English has a predominant presence, not only as a language for learning but also as a language in which Bangladeshi learners are anticipated to develop practical proficiency, it is high time to establish rights on own variety of English under the umbrella of Global Englishes. In Bangladesh, thus, the practice of learning Standard English is a colonial legacy. Apart from the mother language, people have been learning English subsequently the British became successful in colonizing this land and its citizens.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Journal of Academic Multidisciplinary Research (IJAMR);5
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectStandard Englishpl_PL
dc.subjectMy Englishpl_PL
dc.subjectColonialismpl_PL
dc.subjectLinguistic Inferiority Complexpl_PL
dc.subjectnon-standard Englishpl_PL
dc.subjectLinguistics Human Rightspl_PL
dc.titleStandard English in Bangladesh: A legacy of colonizationpl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number122-128pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Lodz, Faculty of Philologypl_PL
dc.identifier.eissn2643-9670
dc.referencesAshcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (1889). The Empire Writes Back. London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesAshcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (2000). Post-colonial Studies The Key Concepts. London and New York : Routledge .pl_PL
dc.referencesBauer, L. (2002). An Introduction to International Varieties of English . Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBhattacharjee, N. (2008). Developing Speaking Skill at Secondary and Higher Secondary Levels: Problems and Few Recommendations. Stamford Journal of English , vol.4, pp.15-29. doi:https://doi.org/10.3329/sje.v4i0.13487pl_PL
dc.referencesChristen, S. (2008). Native or Non-native speakers. Who are the better English teachers? Retrieved from GRIN Verlag: https://www.grin.com/document/140542pl_PL
dc.referencesDavies, A. (2003). The Native Speaker: Myth and Reality. Great Britain: Multilingual Matters Ltd.pl_PL
dc.referencesHickey, R. (n.d.). Standard English and Standars of English.pl_PL
dc.referencesHoque, M. A. (2010, Dec). The Influence of the Local Varieties on the Sound Patterns of English: A Case Study of Bangladeshi Tertiary Students. IIUC Studies, vol.7, pp. 197-220.pl_PL
dc.referencesHossain, M. M., Hasan, M., & Meraj, A. A. (2015). Redefining Bangladeshi Variety of English: Print and Electronic Media Perspective. International Journal of Advanced Research, pp.1280-1286.pl_PL
dc.referencesKachru, B. B. (2005). Asian Englishes Beyond The Canon. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKachru, Y., & Smith, L. E. (2008). Cultures, Contexts,And World Englishes. New York,: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesKubota, R. (2015). Unequal Englishes - The Politics of Englishes Today. UK: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN.pl_PL
dc.referencesPennycook, A. (1998). English And The Discourses Of Colonialism. London and New York.pl_PL
dc.referencesPennycook, A. (1998). English And The Discourses Of Colonialism. London and New York: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesPhillipson, R. (2009). Linguistic Imperialism Continued. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan Private Limited.pl_PL
dc.referencesSkutnabbKangas, T. (2000). Linguistic Genocide in Education—Or Worldwide Diversity and Human Rights? ISBN 0805834672: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.pl_PL
dc.referencesSoboleva, S. (2015, Feb). Global Language: New Opportunities or Inferiority Complex∗. US-China Foreign Language, vol.13(no.2), pp.85-91. doi:doi:10.17265/1539-8080/2015.02.001pl_PL
dc.referencesWiddowson, H. G. (1994). The Ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly , pp.377-388.pl_PL
dc.relation.volume9pl_PL
dc.disciplinejęzykoznawstwopl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe