Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGuyer, Paul
dc.contributor.editorGensler, Marek
dc.contributor.editorGralińska-Toborek, Agnieszka
dc.contributor.editorKazimierska-Jerzyk, Wioletta
dc.contributor.editorKędziorak, Krzysztof
dc.contributor.editorMiksa, Joanna
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-28T11:13:08Z
dc.date.available2022-06-28T11:13:08Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationGuyer P., The Antinomies of Practical Reason, [w:] M. Gensler, A. Gralińska-Toborek, W. Kazimierska-Jerzyk, K. Kędziora, J. Miksa (red.), współpr. M. Mansfeld, Practica et Speculativa. Studies Offered to Professor Andrzej M. Kaniowski, WUŁ, Łódź 2022, https://doi.org/10.18778/8220-570-1.26pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-8220-570-1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/42288
dc.description.abstractThe official antinomy in the Transcendental Dialectic of the Critique of Practical Reason concerns the highest good. But the entire Transcendental Analytic of the first half of the Critique also concerns an antinomy, namely the antinomy between freedom and determinism that was the topic of the third antinomy of the Critique of Pure Reason. These facts raise two questions: what does the treatment of freedom and determinism in the second Critique add to that of the first? And how does transcendental idealism, which is supposed to be the key to the resolution of all antinomies for Kant, play into his solution to the question of the highest good? I argue that we need to look to Kant’s previous works, especially Section III of the Groundwork, to answer the first question, and to his subsequent works, especially the Critique of the Power of Judgment, to answer the second: the second Critique clarifies that we do have a certain kind of insight through pure reason into our noumenal will, and clarifies that the postulate of pure practical reason of the existence of God as the ground of the possibility of the highest good has to be understood through transcendental idealism.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofPractica et Speculativa. Studies Offered to Professor Andrzej M. Kaniowski;
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectKantpl_PL
dc.subjectantinomypl_PL
dc.subjectpractical reasonpl_PL
dc.subjectdeterminismpl_PL
dc.subjecttranscendental idealismpl_PL
dc.titleThe Antinomies of Practical Reasonpl_PL
dc.typeBook chapterpl_PL
dc.page.number503-526pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationBrown Universitypl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn978-83-8220-571-8
dc.referencesAllison, H. E. (1990). Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesAllison, H. E. (2004). Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. New Haven– London: Yale University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesAllison, H. E. (2015). Kant’s Transcendental Deduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGuyer, P. (1987). Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGuyer, P. (2011). “Kantian Communities”, in: Payne, Ch. and Thorpe, L. (eds.), Kant and the Concept of Community (North American Kant Society Studies in Philosophy 9). Rochester: University of Rochester Press, pp. 88–120.pl_PL
dc.referencesGuyer, P. (2016a). “Kant, Mendelssohn, and Immortality”, in: Höwing, T. (ed.), The Highest Good in Kant’s Philosophy. Berlin–Boston: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 157–179.pl_PL
dc.referencesGuyer, P. (2016b). Virtues of Freedom: Selected Essays on Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 275–302.pl_PL
dc.referencesGuyer, P. (2017a). “Transcendental Idealism: What and Why?”, in: Altman, M. (ed.), The Palgrave Kant Handbook. London: Palgrave Macmillan.pl_PL
dc.referencesGuyer, P. (2017b). “The Struggle for Freedom: Freedom of Will in Reinhold and Kant”, in: Watkins, E. (ed.), Kant on Persons, and Agency: Festschrift for Karl Ameriks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 120–137.pl_PL
dc.referencesGuyer, P. (2020). Reason and Experience in Mendelssohn and Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesInsole, C. J. (2013). Kant and the Creation of Freedom: A Theological Problem. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKant, I. (1900–). Gesammelte Schriften (Hrsg.): Bd. 1–22 Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Bd. 23 Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, ab Bd. 24 Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen.pl_PL
dc.referencesKant, I. (1996a). Practical Philosophy, edited and translated by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKant, I. (1996b). Religion and Rational Theology, edited and translated by A. W. Wood and G. di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKant, I. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason, edited and translated by P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesKant, I. (2000). Critique of the Power of Judgment, edited by P. Guyer, translated by P. Guyer and E. Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesReath, A. (2006). “Kant’s Critical Account of Freedom”, in: Bird, G. (ed.), A Companion to Kant. Oxford–Malden: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 275–290.pl_PL
dc.referencesReinhold, K. L. (1790). Briefe über die Kantische Philosophie. Zweiter Band. Leipzig: Göschen.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchmid, C. Ch. E. (1790). Versuch einer Moralphilosophie. Jena: Cröker.pl_PL
dc.referencesSilber, J. (1960). “The Ethical Significance of Kant’s Religion”, in: Kant, I., Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone, translated by T. M. Greene and H. H. Hudson. New York: Harper.pl_PL
dc.referencesUlrich, J. A. H. (1788). Eleutheriologie oder über Freiheit und Nothwendigkeit. Jena: Cröker.pl_PL
dc.referencesWatkins, E. (2010). “The Antinomy of Practical Reason: reason, the unconditioned and the highest good”, in: Reath, A. and Timmermann, J. (eds.), Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 145–167.pl_PL
dc.referencesWood, A. W. (1970). Kant’s Moral Religion. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/8220-570-1.27


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe