dc.contributor.author | Guyer, Paul | |
dc.contributor.editor | Gensler, Marek | |
dc.contributor.editor | Gralińska-Toborek, Agnieszka | |
dc.contributor.editor | Kazimierska-Jerzyk, Wioletta | |
dc.contributor.editor | Kędziorak, Krzysztof | |
dc.contributor.editor | Miksa, Joanna | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-28T11:13:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-28T11:13:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Guyer P., The Antinomies of Practical Reason, [w:] M. Gensler, A. Gralińska-Toborek, W. Kazimierska-Jerzyk, K. Kędziora, J. Miksa (red.), współpr. M. Mansfeld, Practica et Speculativa. Studies Offered to Professor Andrzej M. Kaniowski, WUŁ, Łódź 2022, https://doi.org/10.18778/8220-570-1.26 | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-83-8220-570-1 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/42288 | |
dc.description.abstract | The official antinomy in the Transcendental Dialectic of the Critique of Practical Reason
concerns the highest good. But the entire Transcendental Analytic of the first half of
the Critique also concerns an antinomy, namely the antinomy between freedom and
determinism that was the topic of the third antinomy of the Critique of Pure Reason.
These facts raise two questions: what does the treatment of freedom and determinism
in the second Critique add to that of the first? And how does transcendental idealism,
which is supposed to be the key to the resolution of all antinomies for Kant, play into
his solution to the question of the highest good? I argue that we need to look to Kant’s
previous works, especially Section III of the Groundwork, to answer the first question,
and to his subsequent works, especially the Critique of the Power of Judgment, to answer
the second: the second Critique clarifies that we do have a certain kind of insight
through pure reason into our noumenal will, and clarifies that the postulate of pure
practical reason of the existence of God as the ground of the possibility of the highest
good has to be understood through transcendental idealism. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartof | Practica et Speculativa. Studies Offered to Professor Andrzej M. Kaniowski; | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Kant | pl_PL |
dc.subject | antinomy | pl_PL |
dc.subject | practical reason | pl_PL |
dc.subject | determinism | pl_PL |
dc.subject | transcendental idealism | pl_PL |
dc.title | The Antinomies of Practical Reason | pl_PL |
dc.type | Book chapter | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | 503-526 | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Brown University | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.eisbn | 978-83-8220-571-8 | |
dc.references | Allison, H. E. (1990). Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Allison, H. E. (2004). Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. New Haven– London: Yale University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Allison, H. E. (2015). Kant’s Transcendental Deduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Guyer, P. (1987). Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Guyer, P. (2011). “Kantian Communities”, in: Payne, Ch. and Thorpe, L. (eds.), Kant and the Concept of Community (North American Kant Society Studies in Philosophy 9). Rochester: University of Rochester Press, pp. 88–120. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Guyer, P. (2016a). “Kant, Mendelssohn, and Immortality”, in: Höwing, T. (ed.), The Highest Good in Kant’s Philosophy. Berlin–Boston: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 157–179. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Guyer, P. (2016b). Virtues of Freedom: Selected Essays on Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 275–302. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Guyer, P. (2017a). “Transcendental Idealism: What and Why?”, in: Altman, M. (ed.), The Palgrave Kant Handbook. London: Palgrave Macmillan. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Guyer, P. (2017b). “The Struggle for Freedom: Freedom of Will in Reinhold and Kant”, in: Watkins, E. (ed.), Kant on Persons, and Agency: Festschrift for Karl Ameriks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 120–137. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Guyer, P. (2020). Reason and Experience in Mendelssohn and Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Insole, C. J. (2013). Kant and the Creation of Freedom: A Theological Problem. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kant, I. (1900–). Gesammelte Schriften (Hrsg.): Bd. 1–22 Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Bd. 23 Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, ab Bd. 24 Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kant, I. (1996a). Practical Philosophy, edited and translated by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kant, I. (1996b). Religion and Rational Theology, edited and translated by A. W. Wood and G. di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kant, I. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason, edited and translated by P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kant, I. (2000). Critique of the Power of Judgment, edited by P. Guyer, translated by P. Guyer and E. Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Reath, A. (2006). “Kant’s Critical Account of Freedom”, in: Bird, G. (ed.), A Companion to Kant. Oxford–Malden: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 275–290. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Reinhold, K. L. (1790). Briefe über die Kantische Philosophie. Zweiter Band. Leipzig: Göschen. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Schmid, C. Ch. E. (1790). Versuch einer Moralphilosophie. Jena: Cröker. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Silber, J. (1960). “The Ethical Significance of Kant’s Religion”, in: Kant, I., Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone, translated by T. M. Greene and H. H. Hudson. New York: Harper. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Ulrich, J. A. H. (1788). Eleutheriologie oder über Freiheit und Nothwendigkeit. Jena: Cröker. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Watkins, E. (2010). “The Antinomy of Practical Reason: reason, the unconditioned and the highest good”, in: Reath, A. and Timmermann, J. (eds.), Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 145–167. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Wood, A. W. (1970). Kant’s Moral Religion. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.18778/8220-570-1.27 | |