Some Problematic Philosophical Implications of the Thomas Theorem

Aleksandrowicz, Dariusz

dc.contributor.author	Aleksandrowicz, Dariusz
dc.contributor.editor	Gensler, Marek
dc.contributor.editor	Gralińska-Toborek, Agnieszka
dc.contributor.editor	Kazimierska-Jerzyk, Wioletta
dc.contributor.editor	Kędziora, Krzysztof
dc.contributor.editor	Miksa, Joanna
dc.date.accessioned	2022-06-28T11:26:32Z
dc.date.available	2022-06-28T11:26:32Z
dc.date.issued	2022
dc.identifier.citation	Aleksandrowicz D., Some Problematic Philosophical Implications of the Thomas Theorem, [w:] M. Gensler, A. Gralińska-Toborek, W. Kazimierska-Jerzyk, K. Kędziora, J. Miksa (red.), współpr. M. Mansfeld, Practica et Speculativa. Studies Offered to Professor Andrzej M. Kaniowski, WUŁ, Łódź 2022, https://doi.org/10.18778/8220-570-1.29	pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn	978-83-8220-570-1
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11089/42291
dc.description.abstract	Despite of its wide recognition in the social sciences, the Thomas theorem lacks clarity and finds its expression in diverging statements. A sound core of the theorem is blurred by notions these statements consist of. They include untenable ontology and epistemology along with a flawed claim concerning the peculiarity of the human world.	pl_PL
dc.language.iso	en	pl_PL
dc.publisher	Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego	pl_PL
dc.relation.ispartof	Practica et Speculativa. Studies Offered to Professor Andrzej M. Kaniowski;
dc.rights	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/	*
dc.subject	Thomas theorem	pl_PL
dc.subject	environment	pl_PL
dc.subject	behavior	pl_PL
dc.subject	interactions	pl_PL
dc.title	Some Problematic Philosophical Implications of the Thomas Theorem	pl_PL
dc.type	Book chapter	pl_PL
dc.page.number	561-593	pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation	Professor Emeritus. Europa-Universität Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder)	pl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn	978-83-8220-571-8
dc.references	Aleksandrowicz, D. (1979). Poznanie i krytyka. Wrocław: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.	pl_PL
dc.references	Aleksandrowicz, D. (2015). Kulturen als Information. Eine ökologische Herangehensweise. Berlin: Frank & Timme.	pl_PL
dc.references	Anselm of Canterbury (1986). “Proslogion”, translated by J. Hopkins and H. Richardson, in: Hopkins, J. and Richardson, H. W. (eds.), Complete Philosophical and Theological Treatises by Anselm of Canterbury. Minneapolis: The Arthur J. Banning Press, pp. 88–112.	pl_PL
dc.references	Ariely, D. and Norton, M. I. (2009). “Conceptual Consumption”. The Annual Review of Psychology, 60, pp. 475–499.	pl_PL
dc.references	Barrett, J. L. and Johnson, A. H. (2003). “The Role of Control in Attributing Intentional Agency to Inanimate Objects”. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 3 (3), pp. 208–217.	pl_PL
dc.references	Barwise, J. (1993). Constraints, Channels, and the Flow of Information, in: Aczel, P., Israel, D., Katagiri, Y., Peters, S. (eds.), Situation Theory and Its Applications. Vol. 3. Menlo Park: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 3–27.	pl_PL
dc.references	Barwise, J. and Perry, J. (1983). Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, Mass.–London: MIT Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Berger, P. and Luckmann, Th. (1966/1991). The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London–New York: Penguin Books.	pl_PL
dc.references	Boyd, R. and Richerson, P. (2005). The Origin and Evolution of Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Bruner, J. (1996). The Culture of Education. Cambridge, Mass.–London: MIT Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Bunge, M. (1999). The Sociology-Philosophy Connection. New Brunswick and London: Routledge.	pl_PL
dc.references	Bunge, M. (2001). Philosophy in Crisis. The Need for Reconstruction. Amherst: Prometheus Books.	pl_PL
dc.references	Burge, T. (2010). Origins of Objectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Devlin, K. and Rosenberg, D. (1993). “Situation Theory and Cooperative Action”, in: Aczel, P., Israel, D., Katagiri, Y., Peters, S. (eds.), Situation Theory and Its Applications, Vol. 3. Menlo Park: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 213–264.	pl_PL
dc.references	Esser, H. (1991/1993). “The Rationality of Everyday Behavior. A Rational Choice Reconstruction of the Theory of Action by Alfred Schütz”. Rationality and Society, 5 (1), pp. 7–31.	pl_PL
dc.references	Esser, H. (1996). „Die Definition der Situation”. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 48 (1), pp. 1–34.	pl_PL
dc.references	Gaunilo of Marmoutiers (1986). “On Behalf of the Fool”, translated by J. Hopkins and H. Richardson, in: Hopkins, J. and Richardson, H. W. (eds.), Complete Philosophical and Theological Treatises by Anselm of Canterbury. Minneapolis: The Arthur J. Banning Press, pp. 113–119.	pl_PL
dc.references	Geertz, C. (2000). Local Knowledge. Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.	pl_PL
dc.references	Gibson, J. J. (1982). Notes on Affordances, in: Reed, E. and Jones, R. (eds.), Reasons for Realism. Selected Essays of James J. Gibson. Hillsdale–London: Routledge, pp. 401–418.	pl_PL
dc.references	Hallpike, Ch. R. (1986). The Principles of Social Evolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Haugeland, J. (1998). Having Thought. Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind. Cambridge, Mass.– London: MIT Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Hayek, F. A., (1967). Degrees of Explanation, in: Hayek, F. A., Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.	pl_PL
dc.references	Holland, J. H. (1992). “Complex Adaptive Systems”. Daedalus, 121 (1), pp. 7–30.	pl_PL
dc.references	Kelemen, D. (2004). “Are Children Intuitive Theists? Reasoning about Purpose and Design in Nature”. Psychological Science, 15 (5), pp. 295–301.	pl_PL
dc.references	Krebs, J. R. and Dawkins, R. (1979). “Animal Signals: Information or Misinterpretation”, in: Krebs, J. R. and Davis, N. B. (eds.), Behavioral Ecology. An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford–London–Edinburgh: Blackwell Scientific Publishers, pp. 282–309.	pl_PL
dc.references	Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, J., Feldman, M. W. (2000). “Niche Construction, Biological Evolution, and Cultural Change”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23 (1), pp. 131–146.	pl_PL
dc.references	McHugh, P. (1968). Defining the Situation: The Organization of Meaning in Social Interaction. Indianapolis–New York: Bobbs-Merill Company.	pl_PL
dc.references	Merton, R. K. (1936). “The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action”. American Sociological Review, 1 (6), pp. 894–904.	pl_PL
dc.references	Merton, R. K. (1948). “The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy”. The Antioch Review, 8 (2), pp. 193–210.	pl_PL
dc.references	Merton, R. K. (1982). Teoria socjologiczna i struktura społeczna, translated by E. Morawska and J. Wertenstein-Żuławski. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.	pl_PL
dc.references	Merton, R. K. (1995). Soziologische Theorie und soziale Struktur. Berlin–New York: Walter de Gruyter.	pl_PL
dc.references	Millikan, R. G. (2004). Varieties of Meaning. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Peirce, Ch. S. (1965). Collected Papers. Volume V. Pragmatism and Pragmaticism, edited by Ch. Hartshorne and P. Weiss. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Quine, W. V. O. (1951). Mathematical Logic. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Rieser, J. J. (1999). Dynamic Spatial Orientation and the Coupling of Representation and Action, in: Golledge, R. G. (ed.), Wayfinding Behavior. Cognitive Mapping and Other Spatial Processes. Baltimore–London: The John Hopkins University Press, pp. 168–190.	pl_PL
dc.references	Rozin, P. (2006). “About 17 (+/-2) Potential Principles about Links between the Innate Mind and Culture: Preadaptation, Predispositions, Preferences, Pathways, and Domains”, in: Carruthers, P., Laurence, S. and Stich, S. (eds.), The Innate Mind. Volume 2: Culture and Cognition. Oxford–New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 39–60.	pl_PL
dc.references	Schütz, A. (1962). Collected Papers. I. The Problem of Social Reality, edited by M. Natanson. The Hague: Springer.	pl_PL
dc.references	Schütz, A. (1967). The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Shaw, R. and Kinsella-Shaw, J. (1988). “Ecological Mechanics: A Physical Geometry for Intentional Constraints”. Human Movement Science, 7 (2–4), pp. 155–200.	pl_PL
dc.references	Shimony, A. (1993). Search for a Naturalistic World View. Volume I. Scientific Method and Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.	pl_PL
dc.references	Sperber, D. (2007). Seedless Grapes: Nature and Culture, in: Margolis, E. and Laurence, S. (eds.), Creations of the Mind. Theories of Artifacts and Their Representation. Oxford–New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 124–137.	pl_PL
dc.references	Sterelny, K. (2003). Thought in a Hostile World. The Evolution of Human Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.	pl_PL
dc.references	Thomas, W. I. (1965). Person und Sozialverhalten, edited by E. H. Volkart. Neuwied: Luchterhand Verlag.	pl_PL
dc.references	Thomas, W. I. and Thomas, D. S. (1928). The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs. New York: Alfred A Knopf.	pl_PL
dc.references	Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, Mass.–London: MIT Press.	pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi	10.18778/8220-570-1.30