Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorKacprzyk, Andrzej
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-09T06:17:58Z
dc.date.available2014-06-09T06:17:58Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn2083-8611
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/4916
dc.description.abstractThe Solow growth model is still starting point for most of analyses on long-run economic growth. It assumes the key role of the physical capital and technological progress. In its extended version by Mankiw-Romer-Weil, human capital variable has been added and found to be as important as physical capital in explaining international differences in GDP per capita. The critics of MRW’s model attacked the validity of the model and the data. We present briefly this criticism and its implications for studying institutional determinants of economic growth. The estimations of our Barro type panel regression of economic growth are presented and discussed. The paper concludes with suggestions on methodology for further researches.pl_PL
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicachpl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudia Ekonomiczne;80
dc.rights© Copyright by Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach 2011
dc.subjectwzrost gospodarczypl_PL
dc.subjectinstytucjepl_PL
dc.subjectinstytucjonalne determinanty wzrostupl_PL
dc.subjectmodel panelowypl_PL
dc.titleInstytucjonalne determinanty wzrostu gospodarczegopl_PL
dc.title.alternativeINSTITUTIONAL DETRMINANTS OF ECONOMIC GROWTH
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniwersytet Łódzkipl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord