Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorJung, Elżbieta
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-29T11:06:48Z
dc.date.available2025-08-29T11:06:48Z
dc.date.issued2025-08-29
dc.identifier.citationJung E., Richard Kilvington’s Quaestiones super libros Physicorum: Critical Edition with an Introduction, Research on Science & Natural Philosophy, t.VII, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Lodz 2025, https://doi.org/10.18778/8331-737-3pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-8331-736-6
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/56231
dc.description.abstractIn the late Middle Ages, natural philosophy focused primarily on the analysis of Aristotle’s works, along with Averroes’ commentaries. Among other works, Aristotle’s Physics was taught at universities, and commentaries on it were the result of such classes. The present book is the result of the lectures of Richard Kilvington (ca. 1302-1361), one of the founders of the so-called School of Oxford Calculators, English scholars active in the mid-14th century. The volume contains a critical edition of Richard Kilvington’s Questions on the Physics from Latin manuscripts, provided with footnotes referring to the sources used by Kilvington, as well as to the works of his contemporaries. The edition is preceded by an introduction presenting the arguments for the reconstruction of this commentary and the history of the manuscripts containing Kilvington’s questions. This extensive commentary, which the author reconstructed on the basis of manuscript evidence, consists of eight so-called disputed questions. Kilvington discusses almost all the topics covered by Aristotle in his works on natural philosophy and the theory of knowledge, and logical considerations also occupy a considerable space. Kilvington is mainly interested in issues related to: the formation of complex material bodies, which occurs primarily in the process of mixing, the problem of describing the rules of local motion, and the conditions that determine such motion, i.e. the concepts of time, space, and vacuum. Kilvington’s commentary is an original, sometimes innovative interpretation of the theories of Aristotle and Averroes. It was quoted many times and was an inspiration for contemporary and later thinkers. The research achievements of these thinkers contributed to the development of modern natural philosophy.pl_PL
dc.description.abstractW dojrzałym średniowieczu filozofia przyrody w dużej mierze skupiona była na analizach dzieł Arystotelesa wraz z komentarzami Averroesa. Na uniwersytetach wykładano między innymi Fizykę Arystotelesa, a rezultatem tych takich zajęć były komentarze do tego dzieła. Prezentowana tutaj książka zawiera wydanie krytyczne z rękopisów łacińskich Kwestii do „Fizyki” Ryszarda Kilvingtona (ca. 1302-1361), opatrzone przypisami odwołującymi się do źródeł, z których korzystał Kilvington, a także do prac współczesnych mu myślicieli. Wydanie poprzedza wstęp dokumentujący zasadność rekonstrukcji tego komentarza oraz historię rękopisów zawierających kwestie. Na ten obszerny komentarz, który został przez autorkę zrekonstruowany na podstawie świadectw rękopiśmiennych, składa się osiem tzw. kwestii dyskutowanych. Kilvington omawia w nich niemalże wszystkie zagadnienia poruszane przez Arystotelesa w jego pracach dotyczący filozofii przyrody oraz teorii poznania, sporo miejsca zajmują także rozważania logiczne. Szczególne zainteresowanie Kilvingtona budzą zagadnienia związane z: powstawianiem złożonych ciał materialnych zachodzącym przede wszystkim w procesie mieszania, problemem opisu reguł dotyczących ruchu lokalnego, oraz warunków jakie muszą zachodzić, aby ruch taki miał miejsce, czyli koncepcji czasu, miejsca, próżni. Komentarz Kilvingtona jest oryginalną, czasami nowatorską interpretacją koncepcji Arystotelesa i Awerroesa. Był on wielokrotnie cytowany i stanowił inspirację dla współczesnych mu i późniejszych myślicieli.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch on Science &Natural Philosophy
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectRyszard Kilvingtonpl_PL
dc.subjecthistoria naukipl_PL
dc.subjectfilozofia średniowiecznapl_PL
dc.subjectOksfordzcy Kalkulatorzypl_PL
dc.subjectRichard Kilvingtonpl_PL
dc.subjecthistory of sciencepl_PL
dc.subjectmedieval philosophypl_PL
dc.subjectOxford Calculatorspl_PL
dc.titleRichard Kilvington’s Quaestiones super libros Physicorum: Critical Edition with an Introductionpl_PL
dc.title.alternativeQuaestiones super libros Physicorum Richarda Kilvingtona: Wydanie krytyczne ze wstępempl_PL
dc.typeBookpl_PL
dc.page.number629pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Lodz, Center for the Philosophy of Naturepl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn978-83-8331-737-3
dc.referencesBrugge, Stedelijke Openbare Bibliotheek, Ms. 503.pl_PL
dc.referencesCambridge, Peterhouse College Library, Ms. 195.pl_PL
dc.referencesCittà del Vaticano, Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, Ms. Vat. lat. 2148.pl_PL
dc.referencesErfurt Universitätsbibliothek Erfurt, Dep. Erf., Ms. CA. 8o 74.pl_PL
dc.referencesFirenze, Conv. Sopp. Ms. B.VI.1681.pl_PL
dc.referencesKraków, Biblioteka Jagiellońska, Ms. 648.pl_PL
dc.referencesMünchen, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Ms. Clm 4375.pl_PL
dc.referencesOxford, Bodleian Library, Canon. Misc. 226.pl_PL
dc.referencesParis, Bibliothèque Nationale de France, Ms. lat. 15126.pl_PL
dc.referencesRichard Kilvington, Sophismata, edited by B. E. Kretzmann, N. Kretzmann, [in:] The Sophismata of Richard Kilvington, Oxford: Oxford University Press 1991, pp. 1–151.pl_PL
dc.referencesRichard Kilvington, Quaestiones super libros Ethicorum, edited by M. Michałowska, [in:] Richard Kilvington’s Quaestiones super libros Ethicorum. A Critical edition with an Introduction (Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters 121), Leiden-Boston: Brill 2016, pp. 63–336.pl_PL
dc.referencesRichard Kilvington, Utrum potentia motoris excedit potentiam rei motae, edited by E. Jung, [in:] E. Jung, R. Podkoński, Towards the Modern Theory of Motion: Oxford Calculators and the New Interpretation of Aristotle (Research on Science & Natural Philosophy 4), Łódź: Lodz University Press 2020, pp. 213–266.pl_PL
dc.referencesRichard Kilvington, Utrum omnis creatura sit suae naturae certis limitibus circumscripta, edited by M. Michałowska, [in:] M. Michałowska Richard Kilvington on the Capacity of Created Beings, Infinity, and Being Simultaneously in Rome and Paris: Critical Edition of Question 3 from Quaestiones super libros Sententiarum (Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters 130), Leiden–Boston: Brill 2021, pp. 77–181.pl_PL
dc.referencesRichard Kilvington, Utrum quilibet actus volutatis per se malus sit per se aliquid, edited by E. Jung, M. Michałowska, [in:] E. Jung, M. Michałowska, Richard Kilvington Talks to Thomas Bradwardine about Future Contingents, Free Will, and Predestination: A Critical Edition of Question 4 from “Quaestiones super libros Sententiarum” (Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters 134), Leiden–Boston: Brill 2023, pp. 121–205.pl_PL
dc.referencesB. E. Kretzmann, N. Kretzmann, The Sophismata of Richard Kilvington: Introduction, Translation and Commentary (English trans.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.pl_PL
dc.referencesRyszard Kilvington, Kwestie o ruchu, [in:] E. Jung, Arystoteles na nowo odczytany. Ryszarda Kilvingtona “Kwestie o ruchu”, (Polish trans.), Łódź: Lodz University Press, 2014, pp. 107–316.pl_PL
dc.referencesBakker P. J. J. M., “Syncatégorèmes, concepts, équivocité. Deux questions anonymes, conservées dans le Ms. Paris, B.N., lat. 16.401, liées à la sémantique de Pierre d’Ailly (c. 1350-1420),” Vivarium 34 n. 1 (1996), pp. 76–131.pl_PL
dc.referencesBaudry L., Le Tractatus de Principiis theologiae attribué à Guillaume d’Ockham (Études de philosophie médiévale, Fasc. XXIII), Paris, 1936.pl_PL
dc.referencesBeaujouan G., “Fernand Colomb,” Journal des Savants (Oct.–Dec., 1960), pp. 145–159.pl_PL
dc.referencesBeaujouan G., “Manuscrits scientifiques médiévaux de la Bibliothèque Colombine de Sèville,” [in:] Actes du dixième congrès international d’histoire des sciences, Paris: Hermann 1964, t. I, pp. 631–634.pl_PL
dc.referencesBottin F., “The Mertonians: Metalinguistic Sciences and the Insolubilia,” [in:] The Rise of British Logic P. O. Lewry (ed.) (Papers in Mediaeval Studies, 7), Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies 1985, pp. 235–248.pl_PL
dc.referencesCatalogue of Città del Vaticano, Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, PAL: (https://digi.vatlib.it/mss/Vat.lat).pl_PL
dc.referencesClagett M., Studies in Medieval Physics and Mathematics (Collected Studies Series 103), London: Variorum Reprints 1979.pl_PL
dc.referencesClagett M., The Science of Mechanics in the Middle Ages (University of Wisconsin Publications in Medieval Science), Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press 1959 and 1961.pl_PL
dc.referencesCourtenay W. J., Schools & Scholars in Fourtheenth-Century England, Princeton University Press 1987.pl_PL
dc.referencesCourtenay W. J., “Some Notes on Robert of Halifax, O.F.M.,” Franciscan Studies vol. 33 (1973), pp. 135–142.pl_PL
dc.referencesDescription of the Manuscript: Paris. Bibliothèque nationale de France, Département des manuscrits, Latin 6559 (https://portail.biblissima.fr/en/ark:/43093/mdata0bfce4d00a5423d15a64be6592521ad5514d 3061).pl_PL
dc.referencesDrake S., “Bradwardine’s Function, Mediate Denomination and Multiple Continua,” Physis 12 (1970), pp. 51–68.pl_PL
dc.referencesEmden A. B., A Biographical Register of the University of Oxford to A.D. 1500, vol. 2, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1958.pl_PL
dc.referencesEtzkorn G. J., “Iter Vaticanum Franciscanum: A Description of Some One Hundred Manuscripts of the Vaticanus Latinus Collections,” Leiden–New York: Brill 1998.pl_PL
dc.referencesFedriga R., M. Michałowska, Safeguarding Free Will: William Ockham, Walter Chatton, and Richard Kilvington on the Will, Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka 2022.pl_PL
dc.referencesHanke M., E. Jung, ‘William Heytesbury,’ [in:] E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2018 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/heytesbury/pl_PL
dc.referencesJames M. R., Fasciculus Jo. Willis Clarc dictatus, Cambridge 1909.pl_PL
dc.referencesJung E., Arystoteles na nowo odczytany. Ryszarda Kilvingtona „Kwestie o ruchu,” Łódź: Lodz University Press, 2014.pl_PL
dc.referencesJung E., ”Richard Kilvington”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2022 Edition), E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (eds), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/kilvington/pl_PL
dc.referencesJung E., “Controversy on Infinity between Richard FitzRalph and Richard Kilvington,” [in:] A Companion to Richard FitzRalph. Fourteenth-Century Scholar, Bishop, and Polemicist. M. W. Dunne, S. Nolan (eds), Leiden–Boston: Brill, 2022, pp. 121–153.pl_PL
dc.referencesJung-[Palczewska] E., “Works by Richard Kilvington,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge 67 (2000), pp. 181–223.pl_PL
dc.referencesJung E., “Richard Kilvington’s Theory of Hylomorphism and Qualitative Change”, Przegląd Tomistyczny XXX (2024), pp. 93–118.pl_PL
dc.referencesJung E., “Richard Kilvington’s Theory of Contingency, Necessity, and God’s Absolute and Ordained Power,” [in:] Tense, and Modality. Proceedings of the XXIII European Symposium on Medieval Logic and Semantics, M. Bieniak, W. Wciórka (eds) (Investigating Medieval Philosophy 26), Leiden: Brill (forthcoming).pl_PL
dc.referencesJung E., M. Michałowska, Richard Kilvington Talks to Thomas Bradwardine about Future Contingents, Free Will, and Predestination: A Critical Edition of Question 4 from “Quaestiones super libros Sententiarum” (Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters 134), Leiden– Boston: Brill 2023.pl_PL
dc.referencesJung E., J. Papiernik, “Richard Kilvington’s Influence on the Anonymous Treatise De Sex Inconvenientibus,” Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales 92(2) 2025 (forthcoming).pl_PL
dc.referencesJung E., R. Podkoński, Towards the Modern Theory of Motion: Oxford Calculators and the New Interpretation of Aristotle (Research on Science & Natural Philosophy vol. IV), Łódź: Lodz University Press 2020.pl_PL
dc.referencesJung E., R. Podkoński, “Mathematical Imagination in 14th-Century Natural Philosophy. The Case of an Endless, Infinite Helix Line,” Historia Mathematica 70 (2025), pp. 53–72.pl_PL
dc.referencesJung E., R. Podkoński, “The Dispersed Tradition of Richard Kilvington’s Questions on Aristotle’s Libri naturales (forthcoming).pl_PL
dc.referencesJung E., B. Żukowski, “Modal Logic in Richard Kilvington’s Questions on the Physics” (forthcoming).pl_PL
dc.referencesKaluza Z., Nicolas d’Autrecourt, ami de la vérité, (Histoire Littéraire de la France, XLII, fasc. 1), Paris 1995.pl_PL
dc.referencesKitanov S., Ch. Schabel, “Thomas Bradwardine’s Questions on Grace and Merit from His Lectura on the Sentences at Oxford, 1332–1333, Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge, 89 (2022), pp. 163–236.pl_PL
dc.referencesLeff G., Bradwardine and the Pelagians. A Study of His ’De Causa Dei’ and Its Opponents, (Cambridge Studies in Medieval Life and Thought, New Series, vol. 5), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1957.pl_PL
dc.referencesLiscia di, D. A., “La conclusio pulchra, mirabilis et bona: una ingeniosa demostración atribuible a Nicole Oresme,” Mediaevalia 37 (2018), pp. 139–168.pl_PL
dc.referencesLivesey S. J., “The Oxford Calculatores, Quantification of Qualities, and Aristotle’s Prohibition of Metabasis,” Vivarium 24 (1986), pp. 50–69. Lohr Ch., “Medieval Latin Aristotle Commentaries. Authors: NarcissusRichardus,” Traditio 28 (1972).pl_PL
dc.referencesMaier A., An der Grenze von Scholastik und Naturwissenschaft (Studien zur Naturphilosophie der Spätscholastik, 3), Roma 1952.pl_PL
dc.referencesMaier A., Die Vorläufer Galileis im 14. Jahrhundert (Studien zur Naturphilosophie der Spätscholastik, 3), Roma 1949.pl_PL
dc.referencesMichałowska M., Richard Kilvington’s Quaestiones super libros Ethicorum. A Critical Edition with an Introduction (Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters 121), Leiden-Boston: Brill 2016.pl_PL
dc.referencesMichałowska M., “At the Intersections of Physics and Ethics: Richard Kilvington on Ethical Change,” [in:] Calculating Ethics in the Fourteenth Century E. A. Lukács, M. Michałowska (eds), (Investigating Medieval Philosophy 22), Leiden–Boston: Brill 2024, pp. 70–98.pl_PL
dc.referencesMichałowska M., “Cracking the Code of the Will. Richard Kilvington on the Will and Logic,” [in:] Willing and Understanding: Late Medieval Debates on the Will, the Intellect, and Practical Knowledgepl_PL
dc.referencesR. Fedriga, M. Michałowska (eds), (Investigating Medieval Philosophy 19), Leiden–Boston: Brill 2023, pp. 210-231.pl_PL
dc.referencesMichałowska M., “Ryszarda Kilvingtona Kwestie do Etyki – nowe argumenty i procedury badawcze w czternastowiecznym dyskursie etycznym,” Roczniki Filozoficzne 67/1 (2019), pp. 177-192.pl_PL
dc.referencesMichałowska M., E. A. Lukács, “Calculatory Ethics: Methods, Arguments, and Cases. An Introduction,” [in:] Calculating Ethics, pp. 1–25.pl_PL
dc.referencesMichałowska M., Richard Kilvington on the Capacity of Created Beings, Infinity, and Being Simultaneously in Rome and Paris: Critical Edition of Question 3 from Quaestiones super libros Sententiarum (Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters 130), Leiden–Boston: Brill 2021.pl_PL
dc.referencesMichalski K., “Le problème de la volonté à Oxford et à Paris au XIVe siècle,” Studia Philosophica 2 (1937), pp. 233–265.pl_PL
dc.referencesMolland A. G., “The Geometrical Background to the “Merton School,” British Journal for the History of Science 4 (1968–1969), pp. 108–125.pl_PL
dc.referencesMurdoch J. E, E. D. Sylla, “The Science of Motion,” [in:] Science in the Middle Ages D. C. Lindberg (ed), Chicago: The Univeristy of Chicago Press 1978, pp. 206–264.pl_PL
dc.referencesMurdoch J. E., “From Social into Intellectual Factors: An Aspect of the Unitary Character of Late Medieval Learning,” [in:] The cultural context of medieval learning. Proceedings of the first International Colloquium on the philosophy of science and theology in the middle ages september 1973, J. E. Murdoch, E. D. Sylla (eds), Dordrecht–Boston 1975, pp. 271–339.pl_PL
dc.referencesMurdoch J. E., “Mathematics and Sophisms in Late Medieval Natural Philosophy,” [in:] Les genres littéraires dans les sources théologiques et philosophiques médiévales: définition, critique et exploitation. Actes du colloque international de Louvain-la-Neuve, U.C.L., Institut d’ études médiévales, (Textes, Études, Congrès 5), Louvain-la-Neuve: Institut d’Études Médiévales de l’Université Catholique de Louvain 1982, pp. 85–100.pl_PL
dc.referencesNanini A., “Ethical Implication of a Metaphysical Structure,” [in:] Calculating Ethics, pp. 191–309.pl_PL
dc.referencesPelzer A., “Codices Vaticani Latini,” Roma 1931.pl_PL
dc.referencesPironet F., “William Heytesbury and the Treatment of Insolubilia in Fourteenth-Century England, Followed by a Critical Edition of Three Anonymous Treatises De insolubilibus Inspired by Heytesbury,” [in:] Unity, Truth and the Liar. The Modern Relevance of Medieval Solutions to the Liar Paradox, S. Rahman, T. Tulenheimo, E. Genot (eds), (Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, 8), Dordrecht: Springer 2008, pp. 255–333.pl_PL
dc.referencesPodkoński R., Suisetica inania, Ryszarda Swinesheada spekulatywna nauka o ruchu lokalnym, Łódź: Lodz University Press 2018.pl_PL
dc.referencesPodkoński R., Richard Swineshead’s Theory of Motion (Research on Science & Natural Philosophy, vol. II), Łódź: Lodz University Press 2019.pl_PL
dc.referencesPoorter A. de, “Les Questiones super Libros Sententiarum de Richardi de Killington à la Bibliothèque de Bruges,” Revue Néo-Scolastique de Philosophie 30 (1928), p. 240–241.pl_PL
dc.referencesPoorter A. de, Catalogue des Manuscrits de la Bibliothèque Publique de la Ville de Bruges, Paris: Sociéte d’édition Les Belles Lettres 1934.pl_PL
dc.referencesRead S., “The Calculators on the Insolubles: Bradwardine, Kilvington, Heytesbury, Swyneshed, and Dumbleton,” [in:] Quantifying Aristotle, pp. 126-152.pl_PL
dc.referencesRommevaux-Tani S., De Sex Inconvenientibus, Traité Anonyme de Philosophie Naturelle du XIVe Siècle, Paris: Vrin 2023.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchum W., Beschreibendes Verzeichnis der Amplonianischen HandschriftenSammlung zu Erfurt, Bearbeitet und herausgegeben mit einem Vorworte über Amplonius und die Gesichte seiner Sammlung, 2nd ed. Hildesheim: Weidmannsche Verlagsbuchhandlung–Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung 1887.pl_PL
dc.referencesSharpe R., A Handlist of the Latin Writers of Great Britain and Ireland Before 1350, Turnhout: Brepols, 2001.pl_PL
dc.referencesSpade P. V., S. Read, ‘Insolubles,’ [in:] E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/insolubles/.pl_PL
dc.referencesStegmüller F., Repertorium Commentariorum in Sententias Petri Lombardi, vol. I, Würtzburg 1947, p. 347.pl_PL
dc.referencesSylla E. D., “Infinity and Continuity: Thomas Bradwardine and His Contemporaries,” [in:] The History of Continua: Philosophical and Mathematical Perspectives, S. Shapiro, G. Hellman (eds), Oxford: Oxford University Press 2021, pp. 49–81.pl_PL
dc.referencesSylla E. D., The Oxford Calculators and the Mathematics of Motion, 1320–1350. Physics and Measurement by Latitudes, New York: Garland Publishing 1991.pl_PL
dc.referencesThorndike L., P. Kibre, A Catalogue of Incipits of Mediaeval Scientific Writings in Latin, Revised and Augmented, Cambridge MA, 1963.pl_PL
dc.referencesTrapp D., “Augustinian Theology of the 14th Century,” Augustiniana 6 (1956), pp. 146–273.pl_PL
dc.referencesTruhlář J. Catalogus codicum manu scriptorum latinorum, qui in c. r. bibliotheca publica atque Universitatis Pragensis asservantur, vol. I., Pragae 1905.pl_PL
dc.referencesValentinelli J., Bibliotheca Manuscripta ad S. Marci Venetiarum, Codices mss. Latina, t. V, Venetiis 1871.pl_PL
dc.referencesVittorini M., “Life and Works,” [in:] A Companion to Walter Burley. Late Medieval Logician and Metaphysician, A. D. Conti (ed), Leiden-Boston: Brill, pp. 17–48.pl_PL
dc.referencesWalker Fernandez G., “A New Source of Nicholas of Autrecourt’s Quæstio: the Anonymous Tractatus de Sex Inconvenientibus,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 55 (2013), pp. 57-69.pl_PL
dc.referencesWeijers O., M. B. Calma, Le travail intellectuel a la Faculte des arts de Paris: textes et maitres (ca. 1200-1500). vol. VIII, Studia Aristarum 25 (2010), pp. 114–121.pl_PL
dc.referencesWeisheipl J. A., “Ockham and some Mertonians,” Mediaeval Studies 30 (1968), pp. 163–213.pl_PL
dc.referencesWeisheipl J. A., “The Interpretation of Aristotle’s Physics and the Science of Motion,” [in:] The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. From the Rediscovery of Aristotle to the Disintegration of Scholasticism, 1100–1600, N. Kretzmann, A. Kenny, J. Pinborg, and E. Stump (eds), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1982, pp. 519–536.pl_PL
dc.referencesWilson C., William Heytesbury: Medieval Logic and the Rise of Mathematical Physics (University of Wisconsin Publications in Medieval Science, 3), 2nd ed., Madison, WI, 1960.pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/8331-737-3
dc.relation.volumeVIIpl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/