| dc.contributor.author | Smirnov, Ivan | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-08-20T05:33:33Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-08-20T05:33:33Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-01-12 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ivan Smirnov (2025) Institutional features of the transition of the Kazakh language to the Latin script. Socjolingwistyka XXXIX, 304-319 https://doi.org/10.17651/SOCJOLING.39.17 | pl_PL |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/59160 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This article provides a diachronic description of the main stages in the transition of the Kazakh language to the Latin script. Since 1991, no variant of the alphabet has been officially approved, nor has the Latin script been integrated into education and official documents. Linguistic specialists respon-sible for the transition to the Latin script regularly make errors in creating the alphabets. In particular, vari-ous options featuring digraphs and diacritical marks have been proposed. The alphabets are constructed based on already established variants in Turkic countries, as well as by taking into account the experience of European countries. In total, about 40 variants of the alphabet using the Latin script have been developed. The outcome of this prolonged pro-cess is a diverse set of alphabet variants documented in studies of Kazakhstan’s linguistic landscape. | pl_PL |
| dc.description.sponsorship | National Science Centre, MINIATURA 7, Project number: 2023/07/X/HS2/01355 | pl_PL |
| dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
| dc.publisher | Instytut Języka Polskiego PAN, Polska | pl_PL |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Socjolingwistyka;1 | |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ | * |
| dc.subject | Latin script | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | the Kazakh language | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | alphabet | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | language policy | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | Cyrillic script | pl_PL |
| dc.title | Institutional features of the transition of the Kazakh language to the Latin script | pl_PL |
| dc.title.alternative | Cechy instytucjonalne przejścia języka kazachskiego na pismo łacińskie | pl_PL |
| dc.type | Article | pl_PL |
| dc.page.number | 303–319 | pl_PL |
| dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Uniwersytet Łódzki, Wydział Filologiczny, Instytut Studiów Wschodnioeuropejskich, Zakład Przekładu i Lingwistyki | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Abduova, B. S., & Tulesheva, G. K. 2022. „The status of the Kazakh language is a landmark for the future of the nation”. Vestnik of M.Kozybayev. North Kazakhstan University 1 (53): 53–58. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Aksholakova, A., & Ismailova, N. 2013. „The Language Policy of Kazakhstan and the State Language in Government Service”. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences (93): 1580–1586. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Alpatov, v. M. 2000. 150 âzykov i politika. 1917–2000. Sociolingvističeskie problemy SSSR i postsovetskogo prostranstva. Moskv | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Alishariyeva, A. 2014. „Bilingualism Among Young People in Kazakhstan”. Procedia – Social and Behav-ioral Sciences,143: 1139–11 | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Aqtay, G. 2022. „The status of Kazakh in Kazakhstan in urban areas: the case of Shymkent”. Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski, 13(1): 205–221. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Cheskin, A., & Kachuyevski, A. 2019. „The russian-Speaking Populations in the Post-Soviet Space: Lan-guage, Politics and Identity”. Europe-Asia studies71(1): 1–23. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Dzhusupov, M. 2022. „The transition from Cyrillic into Latin alphabet and linguographic interference in the russian speech of the Turkophone”. Russian Language Studies20(3): 312–329. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Fierman, W. 1998. „Language and Identity in Kazakhstan: Formulations in Policy Documents 1987–1997”. Communist and Post-Communist Studies31(2): 171–186. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Fierman, W. 2005. „Kazakh language and prospects for its role in kazakh «groupness»”. Ab Imperio 2: 393–423. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Hornberger, N. 2015. „Selecting Appropriate research Methods in LPP research: Methodological rich Points”. In: Research methods in language policy and planning: a practical guide, eds. M. Francis and D. Johnson. Malden: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 7–2 | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Iliuf, H. Š., & Soltanbekova, o. T. 2023. „optimalʹnyj variant kazahskogo alfavita na osnove latinskoj grafi-ki”. Izvestiâ Kazumoimâ imeni Abylaj hana,3(70): 84–10. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Imankuliyeva, M. Т. 2021. „Afad Kurbanov and obschetyurkian alphabet”. Baltic Humanitarian Journal,4(37): 268–270. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Janpeisova, N. 2006. Representation of national stereotypes in the picture of world of Kazakh-Russian bilin-guals. Baishev University/Aktobe. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Kajdar, A. 2014. Ġylymdaġy ġu̇myr. Maķalalar, baândamalar žinaġy. Almaty: Sardar. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Kara, M. 2009. „Turkic republics and thirty-four letter common Latina alphabet Turkish Studies”. Inter-national Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic,4(3): 1301–1308. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Kemelova, F. 2024–09–23. „Turkic States revive Latin-Based Alphabet to Preserve Linguistic Heritage”. The Astana Times. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Mensel, L. van, vandenbrouck, M., & Blackwood, r. 2016. „Linguistic Landscapes”. The Oxford Hand-book of language and society: 423–450. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Moore, I. 2014. „Negotiating public space: Post-Soviet linguistic landscape in Kazakhstan”. The Interna-tional Journal of Communication and Linguistic Studies11(4): 1–21. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Nelde, P. 1994. „How to Avoid Language Conflict in Europe after 1994”. Intercultural Communication Studies,4(2): 1–17. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Nurshatayeva, A. 2011. „Kazakhstan English-Major Students: Motivation to Learn English and Academic Achievement”. Academic Leadership: The Online Journal,9(3). | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Sabitova, Z., & Alishariyeva, A. 2015. „The russian language in Kazakhstan: status and functions”. Rus-sian Journal of Communication,7(2): 213–217. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Shaibakova, D. 2019. „The russian language in Kazakhstan in the 21st century”. eds. Arto Mustajoki, A., Protassova, E., Yelenevskaya, M. In The Soft Power of the Russian Language. New York: routledge. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Schiffman, H. F. 1996. Linguistic Culture and Language Policy. London: routledge. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Sinyachkin, v. P., & Saparova, K. o. 2018. „Mahanbet Džusupov – sozidatelʹ, lingvist i metodist”. RUDN Journal of Language Education and Translingual Practices15(2): 189–194. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Smagulova, J., & Madiyeva, D. 2021. „Normalizing a new language hierarchy: Event names in post‐Soviet urban space”. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 25(4): 1004–1023. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Smagulova, J. 2008. „Language Policies of Kazakhization and Their Influence on Language Attitudes and Use”. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism,11: 440–476. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Spolsky, B. (2004) Language Policy. Cambridge: CUP. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Yeskeldiyeva, B., & Tazhibayeva, S. 2015. „Multilingualism in Modern Kazakhstan: New Challenges”. Asian Social Science, 11(6): 56–64. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Zharkynbekova, S. 2018. „on the Formation of Socio-Cultural Identity of Ethno-Lingual Processes In Kazakhstan”. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (39): 407–415. | pl_PL |
| dc.references | Zhumanova, A., Stambulov, S., Sakabay, T., Kentbek, S., & Karsybayeva, Z. 2020. „Language Situation in Kazakhstan in the Modern Period: Ideology, Policy and Planning”. Opción, Año, 36(91): 90–106. | pl_PL |
| dc.contributor.authorEmail | i.smirnow.edu@gmail.com | pl_PL |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.17651/SOCJOLING.39.17 | |
| dc.relation.volume | 39 | pl_PL |
| dc.discipline | językoznawstwo | pl_PL |