K hranici domáciho a ciziho v onymii

Abstract

The limit between the domestic (D) and foreign (F) on the level o f proprium genesis is not identical with that being on the level of synchronous communicative aplication of names. Therefore, the level of the proprial nomination and that o f communication are to be differentiated. In proper names, categories D and F assert themselves, by means of three channels: a - repertoire of lexicals being used at proprial designation activity; b - repertoir of formal (word-forming, name-forming) means; с - native language + communicative situation. Types: 1) elements a, b, с are gentically homogenous - proprium is always D: a—b = c; 2) elements a, b are homogenous, c, however, not proprium has been take over, integrated: а — Ьфс; 3) proprial motivation does not often express the D x F opposition, it is not o f single-national character only. The differences are limited to linguistic feateres only. The increased frequency and fashion (various prestige of с element) interfere with the limit D x F. Necestily: limit D x F is to be analyzed genetically, on a long time axis and under the knowledge of the opposition apelativum x proprium. Systematic approach, the insolated facts are not to be overemphasized. The study of D x F brings us to the problematics of proprial integration and comparation.