dc.contributor.author | Williams, Joshua | en |
dc.contributor.author | Newman, Sharlene D. | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-03-04T10:20:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-03-04T10:20:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-02-04 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1731-7533 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/17233 | |
dc.description.abstract | The goal of the present study was to characterize how neighborhood structure in sign language influences lexical sign acquisition in order to extend our understanding of how the lexicon influences lexical acquisition in both sign and spoken languages. A referent-matching lexical sign learning paradigm was administered to a group of 29 hearing sign language learners in order to create a sign lexicon. The lexicon was constructed based on exposures to signs that resided in either sparse or dense handshape and location neighborhoods. The results of the current study indicated that during the creation of the lexicon signs that resided in sparse neighborhoods were learned better than signs that resided in dense neighborhoods. This pattern of results is similar to what is seen in child first language acquisition of spoken language. Therefore, despite differences in child first language and adult second language acquisition, these results contribute to a growing body of literature that implicates the phonological features that structure of the lexicon is influential in initial stages of lexical acquisition for both spoken and sign languages. This is the first study that uses an innovated lexicon-construction methodology to explore interactions between phonology and the lexicon in L2 acquisition of sign language. | en |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Research in Language;13 | en |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 | en |
dc.subject | American Sign Language | en |
dc.subject | neighborhood density | en |
dc.subject | lexical acquisition | en |
dc.subject | second language | en |
dc.subject | M2L2 | en |
dc.title | Modality-Independent Effects of Phonological Neighborhood Structure on Initial L2 Sign Language Learning | en |
dc.page.number | 199-213 | en |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Williams, Joshua - Indiana University, United States | en |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Newman, Sharlene D. - Indiana University, United States | en |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2083-4616 | |
dc.references | Ann, J. (2006). Frequency of Occurrence and Ease of Articulation of Sign Language Handshapes. Gallaudet University Press. | en |
dc.references | Bochner, J. H., Christie, K., Hauser, P. C., & Searls, J. M. (2011). When is a difference really different? Learners’ discrimination of linguistic contrasts in American Sign Language. Language Learning, 61(4), 1302-1327. | en |
dc.references | Brentari, D. (1998). A Prosodic Model of Sign Language Phonology. MIT Press. | en |
dc.references | Brooks, P. J., & MacWhinney, B. (2000). Phonological priming in children’s picture naming. Journal of Child Language, 27(2), 335-366. | en |
dc.references | Carreiras, M., Gutiérrez-Sigut, E., Baquero, S., & Corina, D. (2008). Lexical processing in Spanish sign language (LSE). Journal of Memory and Language, 58(1), 100-122. | en |
dc.references | Caselli, N. K., & Cohen-Goldberg, A. M. (2014). Lexical access in sign language: A computational model. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1-11. | en |
dc.references | Charles-Luce, J., & Luce, P. A. (1990). Similarity neighbourhoods of words in young children’s lexicons. Journal of child Language, 17(1), 205-215. These in pink bundle as rebuttals; consider them as a unit | en |
dc.references | Charles-Luce, J., & Luce, P. A. (1995). An examination of similarity neighbourhoods in young children’s receptive vocabularies. Journal of Child Language, 22, 727-735. | en |
dc.references | Chen, Q., & Mirman, D. (2012). Competition and cooperation among similar representations: toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors. Psychological review, 119(2), 417. | en |
dc.references | De Cara, B., & Goswami, U. (2003). Phonological neighbourhood density effects in a rhyme awareness task in five-year-old children. Journal of Child Language, 30(3), 695-710. | en |
dc.references | Demke, T. L., Graham, S. A., & Siakaluk, P. D. (2002). The influence of exposure to phonological neighbours on preschoolers’ novel word production. Journal of child language, 29(2), 379-392. | en |
dc.references | Dörnyei, Z. (2006). Individual differences in second language acquisition. AILA review, 19(1), 42-68. | en |
dc.references | Fletcher, P., & MacWhinney, B. (Eds.). (1996). The handbook of child language. Blackwell Publishing. | en |
dc.references | Garlock, V. M., Walley, A. C., & Metsala, J. L. (2001). Age-of-acquisition, word frequency, and neighborhood density effects on spoken word recognition by children and adults. Journal of Memory and language, 45(3), 468-492. | en |
dc.references | Gaskell, M. G. and N. Dumay (2003). Lexical competition and the acquisition of novel words. Cognition, 89, 105-132. | en |
dc.references | Gierut, J. A., & Morrisette, M. L. (2012). Age of word acquisition effects in treatment of children with phonological delays. Applied psycholinguistics, 33(01), 121-144. | en |
dc.references | Hanley, J. A., Negassa, A., & Forrester, J. E. (2003). Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: an orientation. American journal of epidemiology, 157(4), 364-375. | en |
dc.references | Hardin, J. W. (2005). Generalized estimating equations (GEE). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. | en |
dc.references | Holt, C. C. (2004). Forecasting seasonals and trends by exponentially weighted moving averages. International Journal of Forecasting, 20(1), 5-10. | en |
dc.references | Juffs, A. (2011). Second language acquisition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(3), 277-286. | en |
dc.references | Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition. Second Language Learning. | en |
dc.references | Leach, L., & Samuel, A. G. (2007). Lexical configuration and lexical engagement: When adults learn new words. Cognitive psychology, 55(4), 306-353. | en |
dc.references | Lee, J. L., Everitt, B. J., & Thomas, K. L. (2004). Independent cellular processes for hippocampal memory consolidation and reconsolidation. Science, 304(5672), 839-843. | en |
dc.references | Liddell, S. K., & Johnson, R. E. (1989). American Sign Language: The phonological base. Sign Language Studies, 64(1), 195-277. | en |
dc.references | Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and hearing, 19(1), 1. | en |
dc.references | Marentette, P. F., & Mayberry, R. I. (2000). Principles for an emerging phonological system: A case study of early ASL acquisition. Language acquisition by eye, 71-90. | en |
dc.references | Mayberry, R. I. (2010). Early Language Acquisition and Adult Language Ability: What Sign Language Reveals About the Critical. The Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education, 2, 281. | en |
dc.references | Mayberry, R. I., & Witcher, P. (2005). Age of acquisition effects on lexical access in ASL: Evidence for the psychological reality of phonological processing in sign language. In 30th Boston University conference on language development. | en |
dc.references | McLaughlin, B. (Ed.). (2013). Second Language Acquisition in Childhood: Volume 2: School-age Children. Psychology Press. | en |
dc.references | McNeill, D. (1970). The acquisition of language: The study of developmental psycholinguistics. | en |
dc.references | Meier, R. P. (2000). Shared motoric factors in the acquisition of sign and speech. The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 333-356. | en |
dc.references | Metsala, J. L. (1997). An examination of word frequency and neighborhood density in the development of spoken-word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 25(1), 47-56. | en |
dc.references | Morford, J. P., & Carlson, M. L. (2011). Sign perception and recognition in non-native signers of ASL. Language Learning and Development, 7(2), 149-168. | en |
dc.references | Newport, E. L., & Meier, R. P. (1985). The acquisition of American Sign Language. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. | en |
dc.references | Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy—psychophysics software in Python. Journal of neuroscience methods, 162(1), 8-13. | en |
dc.references | Pichler, C. D. (2011). Sources of handshape error in first-time signers of ASL. In G. Mathur & D. J. Napoli (Eds.), Deaf around the world: The impact of language (pp. 96–121). Oxford: Oxford University Press. | en |
dc.references | Rosen, R. (2004). Beginning L2 Production Errors in ASL Lexical Phonology. Sign Language and Linguistics, 7, 31–61. | en |
dc.references | Sandler, W. (1989). Phonological representation of the sign: Linearity and nonlinearity in American Sign Language (Vol. 32). Walter de Gruyter. | en |
dc.references | Showalter, C.E., & Hayes-Harb, R. (2013). Unfamiliar orthographic information and second language word learning: A novel lexicon study. Second Language Research, 29(2), 185-200. | en |
dc.references | Showalter, C.E., & Hayes-Harb, R. (2015). Native English speakers learning Arabic: The influence of novel orthographic information on second language phonological acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35. | en |
dc.references | Slobin, D. I. (Ed.). (2014). The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 4). Psychology Press. | en |
dc.references | Stamer, M. K., & Vitevitch, M. S. (2012). Phonological similarity influences word learning in adults learning Spanish as a foreign language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(03), 490-502. | en |
dc.references | Stoel-Gammon, C. (2011). Relationships between lexical and phonological development in young children*. Journal of child language, 38(01), 1-34. | en |
dc.references | Storkel, H. L. (2001). Learning new words: Phonotactic probability in language development. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(6), 1321. | en |
dc.references | Storkel, H. L. (2003). Learning new words II: Phonotactic probability in verb learning. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 46(6). | en |
dc.references | Storkel, H. L., & Lee, S. Y. (2011). The independent effects of phonotactic probability and neighbourhood density on lexical acquisition by preschool children. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(2), 191-211. | en |
dc.references | Storkel, H. L., & Morrisette, M. L. (2002). The Lexicon and PhonologyInteractions in Language Acquisition. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 33(1), 24-37. | en |
dc.references | Storkel, H.L. (2004a). Do children acquire dense neighborhoods? An investigation of similarity neighborhoods in lexical acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 201-221. | en |
dc.references | Storkel, H. L. (2004b). Methods for minimizing the confounding effects of word length in the analysis of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(6), 1454-1468. | en |
dc.references | Storkel, H.L. (2006). Do children still pick and choose? The relationship between phonological knowledge and lexical acquisition beyond 50 words. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 20 (7-8), 523-529. | en |
dc.references | Tamminen, J., & Gaskell, M. G. (2008). Newly learned spoken words show long-term lexical competition effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(3), 361-371. | en |
dc.references | Van der Kooij, E. (2002). Phonological Categories in Sign Language of the Netherlands. The Role of Phonetic Implementation and Iconicity. LOT, Utrecht. | en |
dc.references | Vitevitch, M. S. (2003). The influence of sublexical and lexical representations on the processing of spoken words in English. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 17(6), 487-499. | en |
dc.references | Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(3), 374-408. | en |
dc.references | Williams, J.T., & Newman, S.D. (in review) Visual Sonority and Handshape Markedness Influence L2 Acquisition of American Sign Language. Unpublished manuscript: in review. | en |
dc.references | Winke, P. M. (2007). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29(01), 143-144. | en |
dc.references | Zamuner, T.S. (2009). The structure and nature of phonological neighbourhoods in children’s early lexicons. Journal of Child Language, 36, 3-21. | en |
dc.contributor.authorEmail | Williams, Joshua - willjota@indiana.edu | en |
dc.contributor.authorEmail | Newman, Sharlene D. - sdnewman@indiana.edu | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1515/rela-2015-0022 | en |