Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCzekalska, Adrianna
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-08T09:59:06Z
dc.date.available2016-07-08T09:59:06Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn0208-6050
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/18723
dc.description.abstractThe reign of Sigismund III Vasa excites controversy today. One of the hardest events seems to be a conflict of the King and the nobility, which is known in the literature as Zebrzydowski rebellion. This dispute can be divided into two phases: the period from March 1606 to the Janowiec compromise on 4–8 October 1606, and the events of the years 1607–1609. This article presents the position of opponents and supporters of the findings which were signed in the camp in Janowiec. There were compared two propaganda writings. They were written after agreement in Janowiec and they are part of the extensive editing of the source published by Jan Czubek. Although the two letters were written by two different groups, a common goal connects them – getting undecided representatives. The agreement announced by Sigismund III on October 8, 1606 did not end the conflict. One if the main points of the agreement was the commitment of the King to convene the Polish Parliament, which was supposed to consider a settlement. Deferring a decision on the opening of the debate has led to increase in 1607 the tension among the Polish nobility. It was the beginning of the next phase of the rebellion, whose highlight was a battle of Guzów on July 6, 1607.pl_PL
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Historica;95
dc.titleUgoda w Janowcu z października 1606 r. w świetle dwóch pism politycznychpl_PL
dc.title.alternativeThe agreement in Janowiec in October 1606 in two political writingspl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Adrianna Czekalska, Łódź 2015; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2015pl_PL
dc.page.number[51]-63pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniwersytet Łódzki, Wydział Filozoficzno-Historyczny, Instytut Historii, Katedra Historii Nowożytnej.pl_PL
dc.identifier.eissn2450-6990
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/0208-6050.95.04


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record