Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOleksińska, Zuzannaen
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-21T11:50:27Z
dc.date.available2016-07-21T11:50:27Z
dc.date.issued2015-12-17en
dc.identifier.issn1730-2366en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/18887
dc.description.abstractPhytotechnologies are plant based technologies of remediation and containment of pollutions. Many advantages of phytotechnologies such as control of water and biogeochemical cycles, positive impact on soil characteristics and lowering the risk of erosion, contaminant immobilization and destruction, habitat restoration, low costs of implementation, and high public acceptance, decide that in more and more cases it is a preferred and recommended method of rehabilitation. Vegetation selected to the particular site conditions and having required characteristics will shape other biotic communities. It is thus immensely important to gather detailed knowledge about all the elements and processes occurring at the place of interest, before employing adequate phytotechnology application.en
dc.description.abstractWykorzystanie fitotechnologii ograniczone jest stężeniami zanieczyszczeń, których rośliny mogą nie przetrwać oraz warunkami klimatycznymi i sezonowymi, a także koniecznością poświęcenia dużego obszaru pod uprawę. Ponadto zabiegi wykorzystujące rośliny są stosunkowo nowymi rozwiązaniami i jeszcze nie wszystko wiadomo o ich możliwościach i konsekwencjach użycia.en
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFolia Biologica et Oecologica;11en
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en
dc.subjectecotechnologiesen
dc.subjectrehabilitationen
dc.subjectremediationen
dc.subjectwatershed managementen
dc.subjectpollution controlen
dc.titlePlants on duty – phytotechnologies and phytoremediation at a glanceen
dc.page.number23-29en
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationDepartment of Applied Ecology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Banacha 12/16, 90-231 Lodz, Polanden
dc.referencesAssessment, M.E. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Island Press Washington, DC.en
dc.referencesBudyko, M.I. 1986. Plants. In: The Evolution of the Biosphere (M.I. Budyko, ed.), pp. 99-137. Springer Netherlands, Amsterdam.en
dc.referencesCostanzo, A. & Bàrberi, P. 2014. Functional agrobiodiversity and agroecosystem services in sustainable wheat production. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 34(2): 327-348. ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000334170800005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3en
dc.referencesDanilov-Danil'yan, V.I., Losev, K.S. & Reyf I.E. 2009. In: Sustainable development in relation to the carrying capacity of the biosphere. Sustainable Development and the Limitation of Growth (V.I. Danilov-Danil'yan, K.S. Losev, & Reyf I.E. eds), pp. 187-196. Springer Berlin Heidelberg..en
dc.referencesDuBowy, P.J. 2013. Mississippi River Ecohydrology: Past, present and future. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 13(1): 73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2013.02.003en
dc.referencesEhret, M., Bühle, L., Graß, R., Lamersdorf, N. & Wachendorf, M. 2015. Bioenergy provision by an alley cropping system of grassland and shrub willow hybrids: biomass, fuel characteristics and net energy yields. Agroforestry Systems, 89(2): 365-381. doi: 10.1007/s10457-014-9773-7 ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000351195300014&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3en
dc.referencesGrayson, J., Chapman, M. & Underwood, A. 1999. The assessment of restoration of habitat in urban wetlands. Landscape and Urban planning, 43(4): 227-236. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00108-Xen
dc.referencesIETC U. 2003. Phytotechnologies: A Technical Approach in Environmental Management. UNEP, Web.en
dc.referencesKirkby, M. 1995. Modelling the links between vegetation and landforms. Geomorphology, 13(1-4): 319-335. doi: 10.1016/0169-555X(95)00065-Den
dc.referencesMarmiroli, N., Marmiroli, M. & Maestri, E. 2006. Phytoremediation and phytotechnologies: A review for the present and the future. In:. Soil and Water Pollution Monitoring, Protection and Remediation (Twardowska, I., Allen, H., Häggblom, M. & Stefaniak, S., eds), pp. 403-416. Springer Netherlands, Amsterdam.en
dc.referencesPhilippot, L. Raaijmakers, J.M., Lemanceau, P. & van der Putten, W.H. 2013. Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 11(11): 789-799. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3109 ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000325797200012&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3en
dc.referencesRyszkowski, L. 1998. Nature friendly farming. Naturopa 86: 9.en
dc.referencesSinden, J.A. & King, D. 1996. Conservation information: a market incentive to promote environmental quality. Biodiversity and Conservation, 5(7): 943-950. doi: 10.1007/BF00054743en
dc.referencesTechnology I, Team RCP. 2009. Phytotechnology Technical and Regulatory Guidance and Decision Trees, Revised: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council.en
dc.referencesThangavel, P. & Sridevi, G. 2014. Environmental Sustainability: Role of Green Technologies: Springer, New Delhi.en
dc.referencesvan Beukering, P.J.H., Cesar, H.S.J. & Janssen M.A. 2003. Economic valuation of the Leuser National Park on Sumatra, Indonesia. Ecological Economics, 44(1): 43-62. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00224-0en
dc.referencesVaněk, T., Podlipna, R. & Soudek, P. 2010. General Factors Influencing Application of Phytotechnology Techniques. In: Application of Phytotechnologies for Cleanup of Industrial, Agricultural, and Wastewater Contamination (Kulakow, P. & Pidlisnyuk, V., editors), pp. 1-13. Springer Netherlands.en
dc.referencesWhetton, P.H., Fowler, A.M., Haylock & M.R., Pittock, A.B. 1993. Implications of climate change due to the enhanced greenhouse effect on floods and droughts in Australia. Climatic Change, 25(3-4): 289-317. doi: 10.1007/BF01098378en
dc.referencesZalewski, M. 2002. Guidelines for the integrated management of the watershed: phytotechnology and ecohydrology: UNEP/Earthprint.en
dc.referencesZalewski, M. 2011. Ecohydrology for implementation of the EU water framework directive. Proceedings of the ICE-Water Management, 164(8): 375-385.en
dc.referencesZalewski, M & Wagner-Lotkowska, I. 2004. Integrated watershed mangement: ecohydrology & phytotechnology. Manual. Integrated watershed mangement: ecohydrology & phytotechnology Manual: UNESCO.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailzuzanna@biol.uni.lodz.plen
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/fobio-2015-0004en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.