Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorGrad, Paweł
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-13T11:40:22Z
dc.date.available2017-02-13T11:40:22Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn1689-4286
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/20537
dc.description.abstractA context of my paper is the debate on reason, tradition and traditional communities, in which this moral and epistemological issues were discussed as a part of general socio-philosophical theory of modernity. In particular I intend to locate my considerations in the context of formal-pragmatic theory of modern communicative rationality developed by Jürgen Habermas and Robert Brandom. I will provide a competitive model of the rationality of tradition by applying a conceptual toolkit of pragmatically oriented analysis to explain practices connected with vocabulary of tradition. I argue that tradition as a communication system has a fully rational structure. My main claim is that communicative structure of tradition has a rational structure of language game. This structure includes defined principles of communication for members of closed tradition-grounded community and rule of inclusion for potential new members. Firstly I consider closely internal principles of communication within the framework of tradition contrasting them shortly with normative-deontic rules of the postenlightenment idea of pragmatic communication discussed by Jürgen Habermas and Robert Brandom. After that I examine the rule of inclusion — the rule, which mediates between closed system of tradition-based community and his environment.pl_PL
dc.description.sponsorshipNumer został przygotowany przy wsparciu Ministerstwa Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherInstytut Filozofii Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris;30
dc.subjectrationalitypl_PL
dc.subjectinferentialismpl_PL
dc.subjecttraditionpl_PL
dc.subjectmodernitypl_PL
dc.titleTradition as a Communication System. A Pragmatic Approachpl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.rights.holder© Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny HYBRIS 2015pl_PL
dc.page.number1-15pl_PL
dc.referencesBrandom, Robert, 2008, Between Saying and Doing: Towards an Analytic Pragmatism, Oxford UP.pl_PL
dc.referencesBrandom, Robert, 2009, The Reason in Philosophy: Animating Ideas, Harvard UP.pl_PL
dc.referencesGiddens, Anthony, 1944, Living in a Post-Traditional Society, [in:] U. Beck, A. Giddens, S. Lash, Reflexive Modernization. Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 56–108.pl_PL
dc.referencesHabermas, Jürgen, 1984, The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1: Reason and The Rationalization of Society, T. McCarthy (trans.), Boston: Beacon Streetpl_PL
dc.referencesHabermas, Jürgen, 1987, Theory of communicative action, vol. 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, T. McCarthy (trans.), Boston: Beacon Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesHabermas, Jürgen, 1998, A Genealogical Analysis of the Cognitive Content of Morality, [in:] C. Cronin and P. de Greiff (eds.), The Inclusion of the Other. Studies in Political Theory, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 3–48.pl_PL
dc.referencesKant, Immanuel, 1966, Critique of Pure Reason, W. S. Pluhar (trans.), Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.pl_PL
dc.referencesMacIntyre, Alasdair, 1988, Three rival versions of moral enquiry: encyclopedia, genealogy, and tradition, London: Duckworth.pl_PL
dc.referencesMacInytre, Alasdair, Whose Justice? Which Rationality?, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesShils, Edward, 1981, Tradition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.pl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord