Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMisztal, Małgorzata
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-04T09:25:21Z
dc.date.available2017-04-04T09:25:21Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn0208-6018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/21135
dc.description.abstractOrdination techniques such as CCA (Canonical Correspondence Analysis) or RDA (Redundancy Analysis) are very popular in ecological research but almost completely unknown in, for example, socio-economic research. The goal of this paper is to concisely organize the concepts and terminology associated with ordination and to present the possibilities of its application in social research with an example of the analysis of the 2015 parliamentary elections results.en_GB
dc.description.abstractTechniki ordynacyjne, takie jak kanoniczna analiza korespondencji (CCA) czy analiza redundancji (RDA), zyskały popularność przede wszystkim w badaniach ekologicznych, trudno natomiast znaleźć ich zastosowania np. w badaniach ekonomiczno-społecznych.Celem pracy jest zwięzłe uporządkowanie pojęć i terminologii związanej z ordynacją oraz wskazanie możliwości aplikacyjnych metod ordynacyjnych w badaniach społecznych na przykładzie analizy wyników wyborów parlamentarnych w 2015 roku.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica;322
dc.subjectordination techniquesen_GB
dc.subjectredundancy analysisen_GB
dc.subjectparliamentary electionsen_GB
dc.subjecttechniki ordynacyjnepl_PL
dc.subjectanaliza redundancjipl_PL
dc.subjectwybory parlamentarnepl_PL
dc.titleOn the Use of Selected Ordination Techniques to Analyze the Parliamentary Election Resultsen_GB
dc.title.alternativeO zastosowaniu wybranych technik ordynacyjnych do analizy wyników wyborów parlamentarnychpl_PL
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2016en_GB
dc.page.number[127]-139
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Łódź, Department of Statistical Methods
dc.identifier.eissn2353-7663
dc.referencesCalow P. (red.) (1999), Blackwell’s Concise Encyclopedia of Ecology, Blackwell Science, London.pl_PL
dc.referencesEveritt B.S., Skrondal A. (2010), The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics, Fourth Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.pl_PL
dc.referencesGauch H.G., Jr. (1982), Noise reduction by eigenvalue ordinations, “Ecology”, vol. 63, pp. 1643–1649.pl_PL
dc.referencesGoodall D.W. (1954), Objective methods for the classification of vegetation. III. An essay in the use of factor analysis, “Australian Journal of Botany”, vol. 2, pp. 304–324.pl_PL
dc.referencesGower J.C. (1984), Ordination, multidimensional scaling and allied topics, (in:) W. Lederman [ed.] “Handbook of Applicable Mathematics”, vol. VI: E. Lloyd (ed.) “Statistics”, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 727–781.pl_PL
dc.referencesGreenacre M. (2007), Correspondence Analysis in Practice, 2ed., Chapman Hall/CRC, Taylor Francis Group, Boca Raton.pl_PL
dc.referencesHill M.O., Gauch H.G. (1980), Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique, “Vegetatio”, vol. 42, pp. 47–58.pl_PL
dc.referencesHotelling H. (1933), Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components, “Journal of Educational Psychology”, vol. 24, pp. 417–441, 498–520.pl_PL
dc.referencesJongman R.H.G., ter Braak C.J.F., van Tongeren O.F.R. (ed.) (1995), Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.pl_PL
dc.referencesLegendre P., Legendre L. (1998), Numerical Ecology, Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.pl_PL
dc.referencesLepš J., Šmilauer P. (2003), Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data using CANOCO, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.pl_PL
dc.referencesPaństwowa Komisja Wyborcza: Wyniki wyborów do Sejmu RP z dnia 25 października 2015, Internet site:http://parlament2015.pkw.gov.pl, access: 15.11.2015.pl_PL
dc.referencesPearson K. (1901), On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space, “Philosophical Magazine”, Ser. 6, vol. 2, pp. 559–572.pl_PL
dc.referencesRao C.R. (1964), The Use and Interpretation of Principal Component Analysis in Applied Research, “Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics”, Series A (1961–2002), vol. 26, no. 4 (Dec., 1964), pp. 329–358.pl_PL
dc.referencesRegiony Polski (2015), GUS, Warszawa.pl_PL
dc.referencester Braak C.J.F. (1986), Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis, “Ecology”, vol. 67(5), pp. 1167–1179.pl_PL
dc.referencester Braak C.J.F. (1994), Canonical community ordination. Part I: Basic theory and linear methods, “Ecoscience”, vol. 2, pp. 127–140.pl_PL
dc.referencester Braak C.J.F., Prentice I.C. (1988), A theory of gradient analysis, “Advances in Ecological Research”, vol. 18, pp. 271–317.pl_PL
dc.referencesvan den Wollenberg A.L. (1977), Redundancy analysis. An alternative for canonical correlation analysis, “Psychometrika”, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 207–219.pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailmmisztal@uni.lodz.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/0208-6018.322.11
dc.relation.volume3en_GB
dc.subject.jelC38
dc.subject.jelD72


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record