dc.contributor.author | Czerny, Mirosław | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-07-10T12:04:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-07-10T12:04:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1508-1117 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/22100 | |
dc.description.abstract | Geographical studies on the development represent a proposal for a integration of some of research topics undertaken by both physical and human geography. Their aim is to analyze the social and economic processes through the prism of natural conditions and their position in particular spaces. Such an assumption makes that the main object of the researchers are the relationships and spatial phenomena of development and underdevelopment. The concept of geography of development was introduced to geography by Jürgen Blenck in 1979. In the center of the geographical studies on development Blenck puts society that occupying a defined space of the specific conditions of the natural environment are creating a network of relations that will either lead to the development or inhibit this process. Blenck postulated the concentration of geography of development on the investigation of processes of development and underdevelopment of specific pieces of geographical space and not strictly on developing countries, as it has been done previously. Thus, there has been a change of paradigm of geographical research from purely spatial analyzes of differences of phenomena and processes to the socio-cultural causes of underdevelopment and differentiation of living standards. Geography began to use to explain the spatial aspects of the development the theories and concepts borrowed from the social sciences and economics. It emerged the need for interdisciplinary research on development directed to the micro-regional analysis. At the same time incorporating of geography into the debate about globalization – its conditions and environmental, social, economic, cultural and political effects gave impetus to the discussion on the broader spatial level, on the sclae of large geographic regions and globally. | en_GB |
dc.description.abstract | Artykuł stanowi krótki przegląd koncepcji badań geograficznych nad krajami rozwijającymi się. Autorka analizuje ewolucję podejścia do kwestii rozwoju w badaniach geograficznych – od geografii krajów rozwijających się do geograficznych badań nad rozwojem i zastanawia się, jakie obecnie jest miejsce geografii rozwoju w polskich analizach na temat globalnego Południa. Wskazuje również na powiązanie podejść geograficznych z innymi w ramach nauk społecznych. Nawiązuje w tym do interdyscyplinarności analiz rozwoju i niedorozwoju w krajach globalnego Południa. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Geographica Socio-Oeconomica; 27 | |
dc.subject | Geography of developing countries | en_GB |
dc.subject | geography of development | en_GB |
dc.subject | development studies | en_GB |
dc.subject | global South | en_GB |
dc.subject | Geografia krajów rozwijających się | pl_PL |
dc.subject | geografia rozwoju | pl_PL |
dc.subject | studia nad rozwojem | pl_PL |
dc.subject | globalne Południe | pl_PL |
dc.title | Badania geograficzne wobec wyzwań interdyscyplinarności studiów nad rozwojem | pl_PL |
dc.title.alternative | Geographical research facing challenges of interdisciplinarity of studies on development | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | pl_PL |
dc.rights.holder | © Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2017; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2017 | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | [63]-71 | |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Uniwersytet Warszawski, Wydział Geografii i Studiów Regionalnych, Zakład Geografii Rozwoju i Planowania Przestrzennego | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2353-4826 | |
dc.references | Andreasson S., 2005, Orientalism and African Development Studies: the ‘reductive repetition’ motif in theories of African underdevelopment, „Third World Quarterly”, 26 (6), s. 971–986. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Bohle H.-G., 2007, Geographische Entwicklungsforschung. Kapitel 24, [w:] Gebhardt H., Glaser R., Radtke U., Reuber P. (red.), Geographie. Physische Geographie und Humangeographie, Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heilderberg. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Boisier S., 2004, Desarrollo territorial y descentralización. El desarrollo en el lugar y en las manos de la gente, „Revista EURE”, 30 (90), Santiago de Chile, s. 27–40. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Büttner H., 2001, Wassermanagement und Ressourcenkonflikte. Eine empirische Untersuchung zu Wasserkrise und Water Harvesting in Indien aus der Perspektive sozialwissenschaftlicher Umweltforschung, Freiburger Studien zur Geographischen Entwicklungsforschung 19, Verlag für Entwicklungspolitik, Saarbrücken. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Coy M., 2001, Institutionelle Regelungen im Konflikt um Land – zum Stand der Diskussion, „Geographica Helvetica”, 56 (1), s. 56–57. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Czerny M., 2012 (red.), Bieda i bogactwo we współczesnym świecie. Studia z geografii rozwoju, WUW, Warszawa. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Czerny M., Córdova-Aguilar H., 2014, Livelihood – Hope and Conditions of a new Paradigm for Development Studies. The Case of Andean Regions, NOVA, New York. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Czerny M., Czerny A., 2016, Bogota – urban expansion. Social segregation and land degradation, Papers on Global Change, IGBP PAN. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Dembicz K., 2008, CEPAL i latynoamerykańska myśl regionalna, Uniwersytet Warszawski, CESLA. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Graham M., 2008, Warped Geographies of Development: The Internet and Theories of Economic Development, „Geography Compass”, 2/3, s. 771–789. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Grzeszczak J., 1981, W kierunku geografii rozwoju, PZLG – Problemy geografii rozwoju, 4, s. 5–14. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Hausmann R., 2001, ‘Prisoners of Geography’, Foreign Policy, January, s. 44–56. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Lackowska M., 2009, Zarządzanie obszarami metropolitarnymi w Polsce. Między dobrowolnością a imperatywem, WUW, Warszawa. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Landes D., 1999, The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why some are so rich and some so poor, WW Norton, London. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Mohan G., Power M., 2009, Africa, China and the ‘new’ economic geography of development, „Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography”, 30 (1), s. 24–28. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Neuburger M., 2001, Landrechte in Brasilien – zur Bedeutung institutioneller Regelungen für Verwundbarkeit und Überlebensstrategien kleinbäuerlicher Gruppen, „Geographica Helvetica”, 56 (1), s. 34–47. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Sachs J., 2006, The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time, Penguin, London. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Scholz F., 2004, Geographische Entwicklungsforschung. Methoden und Theorien, Gebrüder Borntraeger Verlagsbuchhandlung, Berlin–Stuttgart. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Scott A., 2002, Regional push: towards a geography of development and growth in low and middle-income countries, „Third World Quarterly”, 23 (1), s. 137–161. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Seers D., 1977, Back to the Ivory Tower? The Professionalisation of Development Studies and their extension to Europe, „IDS Bulletin”, 9 (2), s. 6–11. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Senghass D. (red.), 1974, Peripherer Kapitalismus. Analysen über Abhängigkeit und Unterentwicklung, Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt/Main. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Serna Mendoza C.A., Czerny M., Londoño Pineda A.A., Velez Rojas O.A., 2015, Livelihood assessment in the district 1 of Medellin – Colombia, „Miscellanea Geographica – Regional Studies on Development”, 19 (4). | pl_PL |
dc.references | Watts M., 2003, Development and Governmentality, „Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography”, 24 (1), s. 6–34. | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorEmail | mczerny@uw.edu.pl | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.18778/1508-1117.27.04 | |