Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorAraujo, Juan J.
dc.contributor.authorWickstrom, Carol D.
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-18T10:16:18Z
dc.date.available2017-09-18T10:16:18Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn0860-7435
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/22581
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents the actions of two high school English language arts teachers as they engage in writing instruction with adolescent English learners. Using a naturalistic, qualitative methodology we investigate the actions two high school English language arts teachers engage in to meet the needs of their students. Findings suggest that embracing the students’ resources, building on linguistic knowledge, taking time to choose the right books and activities, being explicit about writer’s workshop and accepting its frenetic pace because it meets the students’ needs, and using the act of writing as a thinking activity, were the actions that made a difference to promote student success.en_GB
dc.description.abstractKorzystając z naturalistycznej, jakościowej metodologii w artykule zaprezentowane zostaną działania dwóch nauczycieli języka angielskiego w szkole średniej, angażujących się w zaspokajanie potrzeb młodzieży w zakresie nauczania języka. Wnioski sugerują, że najbardziej efektywnymi metodami nauki i osiągania sukcesu przez uczniów są: znajomość źródeł, opieranie się na wiedzy językowej, poświęcenie czasu na wybór odpowiednich książek i aktywności, wyraźne formułowanie zasad rządzących warsztatem pisarskim, a także traktowanie pisania jako czynności nierozerwalnie połączonej z myśleniem.pl_PL
dc.language.isoplen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Librorum;24
dc.subjectwritingen_GB
dc.subjectprofessional developmenten_GB
dc.subjectteacher educationen_GB
dc.subjectadolescentsen_GB
dc.subjectenglish learnersen_GB
dc.subjectpisaniepl_PL
dc.subjectrozwój zawodowypl_PL
dc.subjectedukacja nauczycielipl_PL
dc.subjectmłodzieżpl_PL
dc.subjectnauka języka angielskiegopl_PL
dc.titleWriting Instruction That Makes a Difference to English Learnersen_GB
dc.title.alternativeWarsztaty pisania – ich znaczenie dla uczących się języka angielskiegopl_PL
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2017; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2017en_GB
dc.page.number[77]-96
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationTexas A&M University-Commerce, Department of Curriculum and Instruction
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of North Texas, College of Education
dc.identifier.eissn2450-1336
dc.referencesApplebee, Arthur N. Langer, Judith A. (2013). Writing instruction that works: Proven methods for middle and high school classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesAraujo, Juan (2013). Expanding the learning zone: Decisions that transform the practices of two English language arts teachers. 35th Association of Literacy Educators and Researchers Yearbook, (pp. 87–107). Louisville, KY: Association of Literacy Educators and Researchers.pl_PL
dc.referencesAtwell, Nancie (1987). In the middle: Writing, reading, and learning with adolescents . Montclair, NJ: Boynton Cook Publishers.pl_PL
dc.referencesBaker, Colin (2008). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.pl_PL
dc.referencesBall, Arnetha F. (2006). Teaching writing in culturally diverse classrooms. In: C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research, (pp. 293–310). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBrophy, Jere E. Good, Thomas L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In: M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, 3rd edition, (pp. 328–375). New York: McMillan.pl_PL
dc.referencesBurke, Carolyn Harste, Jerome Short, Kathy (1995). Creating classrooms for authors and inquirers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.pl_PL
dc.referencesCiardiello, Angelo V. (1998). Did you ask a good question today? Alternative cognitive and metacognitive strategies. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 43, 2, 210–219.pl_PL
dc.referencesCisneros, Sandra (1984). The house on Mango Street. New York, NY: Arte Publico Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesCollins, Suzanne (2008). The hunger games. New York, NY: Scholastic Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesCommon Core State Initiative Standards (2015). English language arts standards: Writing 9–10. Retrieved from: http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/W/9-10/pl_PL
dc.referencesCreswell, John W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. New Berry Park, CA: Sage Publications.pl_PL
dc.referencesDelpit, Lisa (1987). Skills and other dilemmas of a progressive black educator. Equity and Choice, 3, 2, 9–14.pl_PL
dc.referencesDewey, John (1910). Science as subject-matter and as method. Science, 31, 121–127.pl_PL
dc.referencesEdelsky, Carole (1986). Writing in the bilingual program: Habia una vez. Norwood: NJ. Abex.pl_PL
dc.referencesEnglert, Carol S. Mariage, Troy V. Dunsmore, Kailonnie (2010). Tenets of sociocultural theory in writing instruction. In: C. A. MacActhur, S. Graham, J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of Writing Research, (pp. 208–221). New York: Guilford Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFreire, Paulo (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. NY: Continuum.pl_PL
dc.referencesFu, Danling (2009). Writing between languages: How English language learners make the trans ition to fluency. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.pl_PL
dc.referencesGallagher, Kelly (2006). Teaching adolescent writers. NY: Stenhouse Publications.pl_PL
dc.referencesGambrell, Linda B. Malloy, Jacquelynn A. Mazzoni, Suzan A. (2011). Evidenced based best practices for comprehensive literacy instruction. In: L. B. Gambrell, L. M. Morrow (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction, 4th edition, (pp. 11–36). New York, NY: Guilford.pl_PL
dc.referencesGonzales, Linda Northcutt Watson, Daniel (1986). Sheltered English teaching handbook. Carlsbad, CA: Northcutt, Watson, and Gonzalez.pl_PL
dc.referencesGraham, Steve Perin, Dolores (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high school. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.pl_PL
dc.referencesHoldaway, Don (1979). The foundations of literacy. New York, NY: Ashton Scholastic.pl_PL
dc.referencesHomer (1996) The Odyssey. (R. Fagles, Trans.). New York, NY: Penguin Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesKrashen, Stephen D. (1987). Principles and practices in second language acquisition. Prentice Hall International.pl_PL
dc.referencesKwok, Michelle N. Ganding, Exequiel Hull, Glynda A. Moje, Elizabeth B. (2016). Sociocultural approaches to high school instruction: Examining the roles of context, positionality, and power. In: C. A. MacActhur, S. Graham, J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of Writing Research, 2nd edition, (pp. 257–271). New York: Guilford Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcCarthey, Sarah Mkhize, Dumisile (2013). Teachers' orientations towards writing instruction. Journal of Writing Research, 4, 4, 1–33.pl_PL
dc.referencesMerriam, Sharan B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.pl_PL
dc.referencesMoll, Luis C. Amanti, Cathy Neff, Deborah Gonzalez, Norma (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31, 2, 132–141.pl_PL
dc.referencesMoll, Luis C. (1989). Teaching second language students: A Vygotskian perspective. In: D. Johnson S. Roen (Eds.), Richness in writing, (pp. 57–69). NY: Longman.pl_PL
dc.referencesNational Assessment of Educational Progress (2011). The nation’s report card: Writing 2011. Retrieved from: http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2011/2012470.pdfpl_PL
dc.referencesPatterson, Leslie Wickstrom, Carol Roberts, Jennifer Araujo, Juan, Hoki, Chieko (Winter 2010). Deciding when to step in and when to back off: Culturally mediated writing instruction for adolescent English language learners. The Tapestry Journal, 2, 2, p. 1–28.pl_PL
dc.referencesPatton, Michael Q. (2001). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.pl_PL
dc.referencesPeregoy, Suzanne F. Boyle, Owen F. (2012). Reading, writing and learning in ESL: A resource book (6th edition). Boston, MA: Pearson Publications.pl_PL
dc.referencesRosenblatt, Louise M. (2004). The transactional theory of reading and writing. In: R. B. Rudell, N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading, 5th edition, (pp. 1363–1398). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.pl_PL
dc.referencesSalinger, Jerome D. (1951). Catcher in the rye. New York, NY: Little Brown and Company.pl_PL
dc.referencesShavelson, Richard J. (1973). The basic teaching skill: Decision-making. Stanford, CA: Stanford University School of Education Center for R D Teaching.pl_PL
dc.referencesTexas Education Agency (2013). Writing scores for end of course exams for fall 2012. Retrieved from: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/staar/rpt/sum/yr13/pl_PL
dc.referencesVygotsky, Lev S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesWickstrom, Carol Araujo, Juan Patterson, Leslie (with Hoki, Chieko, Roberts, Jennifer) (2011). Teachers prepare students for careers and college: “I see you”, therefore I can teach you. In: P. Dunston, K. H. Gambrell, P. Stecker, S. Fullerton, V. Gillis, C. C. Bates (Eds.), 60th Literacy Research Association Yearbook, (pp. 113–126). Oak Creek, WI: Literacy Research Association.pl_PL
dc.referencesWilhelm, Jeffrey D. (2007). Engaging readers and writers with inquiry: Promoting deep unde rstandings in language arts and content areas with guiding questions. New York: Scholastic.pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailjuan.araujo@tamuc.edu
dc.contributor.authorEmailCarol.Wickstrom@unt.edu
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/0860-7435.24.06
dc.relation.volume1en_GB


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord