Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBezpiatchuk, Zhanna
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-14T07:27:15Z
dc.date.available2018-09-14T07:27:15Z
dc.date.issued2016-04-26
dc.identifier.issn2300-1690
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/25604
dc.description.abstractThis research proposes the comparative analysis of the symbolic representations of Maidan in the Ukrainian and Polish media outlets that comprise tabloid and quality publications. Different types of symbols are identified in the news analysis, reports, and feature stories on Maidan. The typology of symbols is worked out on the basis of the Cassirer’s philosophy of symbolic forms and Langer’s symbol theory. The coded types of symbols include symbol-products, symbol-concepts, symbol-slogans, symbol-situations, symbol-processes, and symbolic actions. With the help of the content analysis it is found that some most visible symbols in the media coverage of Maidan coincide in the Ukrainian and Polish print media. These are the symbol-concept “barricade”, the symbol-concept “Berkut”, and the symbol-process “dispersal of Maidan”. However, there are symbols that have either quantitative or qualitative significance in the Polish press and are absent in the Ukrainian media at all, namely, the symbol-product “blood”, the symbol-concept “solidarity”, the symbol-concept “freedom”.pl_PL
dc.description.abstractW niniejszym artykule przedstawiono wyniki analizy porównawczej reprezentacji symbolicznych Majdanu w prasie ukraińskiej oraz polskiej, w tym reprezentacji obecnych zarówno w tabloidach, jak i w tygodnikach opinii. Przedmiotem badania stały się różne typy symboli (tj. symbole-produkty, symbole-koncepty, symbole-slogany, symbole-sytuacje, symbole-procesy, działania symboliczne), wyodrębnione w oparciu o filozofię form symbolicznych Ernsta Cassirera oraz teorię symboli Susanne Langer, identyfikowane w reportażach i artykułach publicystycznych poświęconych wydarzeniom, jakie miały miejsce na Majdanie Niezależności w Kijowie w czasie Rewolucji Godności. Dzięki analizie zawartości tych tekstów udało się ustalić, że najbardziej widoczne symbole są, i w prasie ukraińskiej, i w prasie polskiej, podobne. Wśród nich należy wymienić: „barykadę” (symbol-koncept), „Berkut” (symbol-koncept), „rozpędzenie Majdanu” (symbol-proces). Ponadto w prasie polskiej dostrzeżono symbole, jak też idee i pojęcia je wyrażające, nieobecne w prasie ukraińskiej, w tym: „krew”, „solidarność” i „wolność”.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherKatedra Socjologii Polityki i Moralności, Wydział Ekonomiczno-Socjologiczny UŁpl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWładza Sądzenia;8
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/*
dc.subjectsymbolic representationpl_PL
dc.subjectMaidanpl_PL
dc.subjectquality presspl_PL
dc.subjecttabloidpl_PL
dc.subjectsymbol-productpl_PL
dc.subjectsymbol-conceptpl_PL
dc.subjectsymbol-sloganpl_PL
dc.subjectsymbol-situationpl_PL
dc.subjectsymbol-processpl_PL
dc.titleSymbolic Representations of Maidan in the Ukrainian and Polish Press: Comparative Analysispl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number56-81pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationMohyla School of Journalism Faculty of Social Sciences and Technologies National University of «Kyiv-Mohyla Academy»pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteZhanna Bezpiatchuk, PhD student of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Doctoral School, program “Mass Communications”, fourth year of studying. Interests: philosophy of communication, social phenomenology, theories of signs and symbols, Polish contemporary history.pl_PL
dc.referencesAlexander, J. C. & Mast, J. L. (2006). Introduction: Symbolic action in theory and practice: Cultural pragmatics of symbolic action. In: J. C. Alexander, B. Giesen, & J. L. Mast (eds.), Social performance: Symbolic action, cultural pragmatics, and ritual (pp. 1–28) . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBaudrillard, J. (1994) Simulacra and simulation . Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesBourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesCarey, J., W. (2009). Communication as culture. Essays on media and society . New York and London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesCassirer, E. (1910). Substanzbegriff und funktionsbe - griff. Untersuchungenüber die Grundfragen der Erkenntniskritik. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer Verlagpl_PL
dc.referencesCassirer, E. (1922). Die BegriffsformimmythischenDenken. Leipzig, Berlin: Teubner.pl_PL
dc.referencesCassirer, E. (1923). Philosophie der symbolischenfor - men. ErsterTeil: Die Sprache (Vol. 2). Berlin: Bruno Cassirer Verlag.pl_PL
dc.referencesCassirer, E. (1925). Philosophie der symbolischenfor - men. ZweiterTeil: Das mythischeDenken (Vol. 2). Berlin: Bruno Cassirer Verlag.pl_PL
dc.referencesCassirer, E. (1929). Philosophie der symbolis - chenformen. DritterTeil: Phänomenologie der Erkenntnis (Vol. 3). Berlin: Bruno Cassirer Verlagpl_PL
dc.referencesCassirer, E. (1944). An essay on man. An introduction to a philosophy of human culture. New Haven: Yale University Presspl_PL
dc.referencesChech, A. (Ed.). (2014). 94 dni. EuroMaidan ochyma TSN . Kyiv: Osnovy.pl_PL
dc.referencesCottle, S. (2008). Reporting demonstrations: The changing media politics of dissent. Media, Culture & Society, 30 , 853–872.pl_PL
dc.referencesCouldry, N. (2003). Media rituals: A critical approach. London and New York: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesDeLuca, K. M., &Peeples, J. (2002). From public sphere to public screen: Democracy, activism, and the “violence” of Seattle. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19 (2), 125–151.pl_PL
dc.referencesDerrida, J. (1978). Writing and difference . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesDobek-Ostrowska, B. (2011). Italianization (or medi- terraneanization) of the Polish media system? Reality and perspective. In: D. C. Hallin& P. Mancini (eds.), Comparing media systems beyond the western world, (pp. 26–55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesDyczok, M. (2016). Ukraine’s media during revo - lution, annexation, war, and economic crisis. E-International Relations . Retrieved from http:// www.e-ir.info/2016/04/20/ukraines-media-during- revolution-annexation-war-and-economic-crisis/#. VxfLfSN9H-Q.facebookpl_PL
dc.referencesFairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis . London and New York: Longman.pl_PL
dc.referencesFeron, O. (1997). Finitude et sensibilité dans la philoso - phie d’Ernst Cassirer . Paris: Editions Kimépl_PL
dc.referencesFerretti, S., & Pierce, R. (1989). Cassirer, Panofsky and Warburg: symbol, art and history . New Haven: Yale University press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFlyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstanding about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12 (2), 219–245.pl_PL
dc.referencesGazeta Segodnia – Stabilnyj Lider Rynka Pressy 2015 Goda. Retrieved from http://www.segodnya.ua/ ukraine/gazeta-segodnya-stabilnyy-lider-rynka- pressy-2015–672586.htmlpl_PL
dc.referencesGazeta Segodnia – stabilnyj lider rynku presy 2015. (2015, December 2). Retrieved from http:// mgukraine.com/press-center/news/view/231- -gazeta-segodnyastabilynij-lider-rinku-presi-2015pl_PL
dc.referencesGeertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Selected essays. New York: Basic Books, Inc., Publishers.pl_PL
dc.referencesGoodman, N. (1988). Ways of World Making. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.pl_PL
dc.referencesHendriyani, H. E., d’Haenens, L., & Beentjes, J. W. (2016). Changes in cultural representations on Indonesian children’s television from the 1980s to the 2000s. Asian Journal of Communication , 1–16.pl_PL
dc.referencesHertog, J. K.,& McLeod, D. M. (2001). A multiper - spectival approach to framing analysis: A field guide. In:S. D.Reese, Jr. O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 139–161). London and New York: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesJanz, N. (2001). ErnstCassirer, unepistomologuedela- troisièmevoie . Paris: Kim.pl_PL
dc.referencesKant, E. (1999 ). Antropologia s pragmaticheskoy - tochkizrenia . Saint-Petersburg: Nauka. Retrieved from http://www.bim-bad.ru/docs/kant_anthoro - pology.pdfpl_PL
dc.referencesKitzinger, J. (2000). Media templates: patterns of asso - ciation and the (re)construction of meaning over time. Media, Culture and Society, 22 (1), 61–84.pl_PL
dc.referencesKonopka, J. (2012). The national market of daily press after 1989. In: K. Pokorna-Ignatowicz (ed.), The Polish media system 1989–2011 (pp. 23–40). Krakow: Andrzej Frycz Krakow University.pl_PL
dc.referencesLanger, S. K. (1954). Philosophy in a new key: A study in the symbolism of reason, rite, and art . The New American Library.pl_PL
dc.referencesMinakov, M. (2007). Istoriaponiattiadosvidu . Kyiv: Papapan.pl_PL
dc.referencesPaetzold, H. (1995). Ernst Cassirer von Marburg nach New York: EinephilosophischeBiographie . Darmstadt: WissenschaftlicheBuchgesellschaft.pl_PL
dc.referencesPerlmutter, D. D., & Wagner, G. L. (2004). The auton- omy of photojournalistic icon. Marginalization of dissent in the selection and framing of “a death in Genoa”. Visual Communication 3 (1), 91–108.pl_PL
dc.referencesPokorna-Ignatowicz, K. (Ed.). (2012). The Polish media system 1989–2011 . Kraków: KrakowskaAkademiaim. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego.pl_PL
dc.referencesRauer, V. (2006). Symbols in action: Willy Brandt’s kneefall at the Warsaw Memorial. In: J. C. Alexander, B. Giesen, & J. L. Mast (eds.), Social performance: Symbolic action, cultural pragmatics, and ritual (pp. 257–282). Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesRecki, B. (2004). Kultur als Praxis . Eine Einführung in Ernst Cassirers Philosophie der symbolischen Forme. Berlin: Akademie-Verlagpl_PL
dc.referencesRicoeur, P. (1965). De l’interprétation Essai sur Sigmund Freud . Paris: Éditions du Seuil.pl_PL
dc.referencesSkidelsky, E. (2011). Ernst Cassirer: the last philosopher of culture . Princeton: Princeton University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesSymbol. (2005). In: Osnovyphilosophiikultury. Slovnyk . Kyiv: ZnanniaUkrainy.pl_PL
dc.referencesTalbot, M. (2007). Media discourse: Representation and interaction . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesTaylor, D. (1994). Performing gender: las madres de la plaza de Mayo. In: D. Taylor & J. Villegas (eds.), Negotiating performance: Gender, sexuality, and theatricality in Latino America. Durham: Duke University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesTurner, V. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti- structure . Chicago: Aldine Publishing.pl_PL
dc.referencesVerley, X. (2013). Sur le symbolisme. Cassirer, Whitehead et Ruyer. Louvain-la-Neuve: Les Éditions Chromatika.pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailz.bezpiatchuk@gmail.compl_PL


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska