Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorThurairajah, Kalyani
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-18T09:49:58Z
dc.date.available2019-06-18T09:49:58Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/28860
dc.description.abstractQualitative researchers are expected to engage in reflexivity, whereby they consider the impact of their own social locations and biases on the research process. Part of this practice involves the consideration of boundaries between the researcher and the participant, including the extent to which the researcher may be considered an insider or an outsider with respect to the area of study. This article explores the three different processes by which boundaries are made and deconstructed, and the ethical complexities of this boundary making/(un)making process. This paper examines the strengths and limitations of three specific scenarios: 1) when the researcher is fully cloaked and hiding their positionalities; 2) when there is strategic undressing to reveal some positionalities; 3) when there is no cloak, and all positionalities are shared or revealed. This paper argues that it is insufficient to be reflexive about boundaries through acknowledgement, and instead advocates reflexivity that directly examines the processes by which social locations are shared and hidden during the research process.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesQualitative Sociology Review; 1
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.en_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en_GB
dc.subjectReflexivityen_GB
dc.subjectQualitative Researchen_GB
dc.subjectSocial Locationsen_GB
dc.subjectPositionalitiesen_GB
dc.subjectEthicsen_GB
dc.subjectInsider/Outsideren_GB
dc.titleUncloaking the Researcher: Boundaries in Qualitative Researchen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.page.number132-147
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationMacEwan University, Canada
dc.identifier.eissn1733-8077
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteKalyani Thurairajah is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Sociology at MacEwan University. Her research is focused on questions pertaining to national identities among immigrants, and the process through which they negotiate their loyalties between their countries of origin and countries of settlement. She is also interested in how narratives of multiculturalism and racism influence the development and maintenance of national identities.en_GB
dc.referencesBerger, Roni. 2015. “Now I See It, Now I Don’t: Researcher’s Position and Reflexivity in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Research 15(2):219-234.en_GB
dc.referencesBott, Esther. 2010. “Favorites and Others: Reflexivity and the Shaping of Subjectivities and Data in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Research 10(2):159-173.en_GB
dc.referencesBridges-Rhoads, Sarah, Jessica Van Cleave, and Hilary E. Hughes. 2016. “Complicating Methodological Transparency.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 29(4):536-552.en_GB
dc.referencesCataldi, Silvia. 2014. “Public Sociology and Participatory Approaches. Towards a Democratization of Social Research?” Qualitative Sociology Review 10(4):152-172.en_GB
dc.referencesCouture, Amanda L., Arshia U. Zaidi, and Eleanor Maticka-Tyndale. 2012. “Reflexive Accounts: An Intersectional Approach to Exploring the Fluidity of Insider/Outsider Status and the Researcher’s Impact on Culturally Sensitive Post-Positivist Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Sociology Review 8(1):86-105.en_GB
dc.referencesCutcliffe, John R. 2003. “Reconsidering Reflexivity: Introducing the Case for Intellectual Entrepreneurship.” Qualitative Health Research 13(1):136-148.en_GB
dc.referencesDaly, Kerry. 1992. “Parenthood as Problematic: Insider Interviews with Couples Seeking to Adopt.” Pp. 103-125 in Qualitative Methods in Family Research, edited by J. F. Gilgun, K. Daly, and G. Handel. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.en_GB
dc.referencesDay, Suzanne. 2012. “A Reflexive Lens: Exploring Dilemmas of Qualitative Methodology through the Concept of Reflexivity.” Qualitative Sociology Review 8(1):60-85.en_GB
dc.referencesDowling, Maura. 2006. “Approaches to Reflexivity in Qualitative Research.” Nurse Researcher 13(3):7-21.en_GB
dc.referencesDrake, Pat. 2010. “Grasping at Methodological Understanding: A Cautionary Tale from Insider Research.” International Journal of Research and Method in Education 33(1):85-99.en_GB
dc.referencesFinlay, Linda. 2002. “‘Outing’ the Researcher: The Provenance, Process, and Practice of Reflexivity.” Qualitative Health Research 12(4):531-545.en_GB
dc.referencesFuller, Duncan. 1999. “Part of the Action, or ‘Going Native?’ Learning to Cope with the ‘Politics of Integration.’” Area 31(3):221-227.en_GB
dc.referencesGair, Susan. 2012. “Feeling Their Stories: Contemplating Empathy, Insider/Outsider Positionings, and Enriching Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Health Research 22(1):134-143.en_GB
dc.referencesHarding, Sandra. 1993. “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What Is ‘Strong Objectivity?’” Pp. 49-82 in Feminist Epistemologies, edited by L. Alcoff, E. Potter. New York: Routledge.en_GB
dc.referencesHellawell, David. 2006. “Inside-Out: Analysis of the Insider-Outsider Concept as a Heuristic Device to Develop Reflexivity in Students Doing Qualitative Research.” Teaching in Higher Education 11(4):483-494.en_GB
dc.referencesJosselson, Ruthellen. 2007. “The Ethical Attitude in Narrative Research: Principles and Practicalities.” Pp. 537-566 in Handbook of Narrative Inquiry: Mapping a Methodology, edited by D. J. Clandinin. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.en_GB
dc.referencesKanuha, Valli Kalei. 2000. “‘Being’ Native versus ‘Going Native’: Conducting Social Work Research as an Insider.” Social Work 45(5):439-447.en_GB
dc.referencesLynch, Michael. 2000. “Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge.” Theory, Culture & Society 17(3):26-54.en_GB
dc.referencesMauthner, Natasha S. and Andrea Doucet. 2003. “Reflexive Accounts and Accounts of Reflexivity in Qualitative Data Analysis.” Sociology 37(3):413-431.en_GB
dc.referencesNencel, Lorraine. 2014. “Situating Reflexivity: Voices, Positionalities and Representations in Feminist Ethnographic Texts.” Women’s Studies International Forum 43:75-83.en_GB
dc.referencesObasi, Chijioke. 2014. “Negotiating the Insider/Outsider Continua: A Black Female Hearing Perspective on Research with Deaf Women and Black Women.” Qualitative Research 14(1):61-78.en_GB
dc.referencesO’Reilly, Karen. 2009. Key Concepts in Ethnography. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.en_GB
dc.referencesPatai, Daphne. 1994. “When Method Becomes Power.” Pp. 61-73 in Power and Method, edited by A. Gitlen. New York: Routledge.en_GB
dc.referencesPillow, Wanda. 2003. “Confession, Catharsis, or Cure? Rethinking the Uses of Reflexivity as Methodological Power in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 16(2):175-196.en_GB
dc.referencesRiach, Kathleen. 2009. “Exploring Participant-Centered Reflexivity in the Research Interview.” Sociology 43(2):356-370.en_GB
dc.referencesSultana, Farhana. 2007. “Reflexivity, Positionality and Participatory Ethics: Negotiating Fieldwork Dilemmas in International Research.” An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 6(3):374-385.en_GB
dc.referencesWhitley, Cameron T. 2015. “Trans*-Subjectivity: Exploring Research Positionality in the Field.” Qualitative Sociology Review 11(4):66-80.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorEmailthurairajahk@macewan.ca
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-8077.15.1.06
dc.relation.volume15en_GB


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.