Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorMisheva, Vessela
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-02T12:15:44Z
dc.date.available2019-07-02T12:15:44Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/29140
dc.description.abstractThe present work is the beginning of a discussion that again addresses the question of Jane Addams’ sociological heritage. That latter is defined as a puzzle which may finally have a solution in that all of the pieces now appear to have been collected. The approach taken to recovering Addams’ identity as a sociologist involves a historico-sociological exploration of the influences upon the formation of her sociological thought, with a focus on Auguste Comte, the Father of Sociology. The article argues that Addams emulated Comte’s scientific mission and took upon herself the task of continuing his project by following another route to the goal. She is thus Comte’s successor, and even rival, insofar as she sought to establish sociology as a science that may be placed in charge of producing knowledge about social life and has the social mission of finding solutions to social problems that politicians proved incapable of tackling. Addams emerges from the discussion as the creator of a sociological paradigm that was dismissed, dismantled, and then lost in the process of the scientific revolution that took place unnoticed after the end of World War I, when the normal period of the scientific development of sociology in America came to an end. The suppression during the 1920s of the type of sociology that Addams developed and adhered to has left sociology in a state of unresolved identity crisis and arrested scientific development.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesExpanding Social Interactionist Horizons: Bridging Disciplines and Approaches; 2
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.en_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en_GB
dc.subjectSociological Paradigmen_GB
dc.subjectSociological Canonen_GB
dc.subjectAddams’s Sociological Identityen_GB
dc.subjectComte’s Unfinished Projecten_GB
dc.subjectMechanism of Emulationen_GB
dc.subjectSymbolic Interactionismen_GB
dc.titleJane Addams and the Lost Paradigm of Sociologyen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.page.number216-228
dc.identifier.eissn1733-8077
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteVessela Misheva is a Professor of Sociology at the Department of Sociology, Uppsala University. She has also served as a Professor of Social Psychology at the University of Sködve, Sweden. She was awarded a Ph.D. in the philosophy of science from the Bulgaria Academy of Sciences, as well as a Ph.D. in sociology from Uppsala University. Misheva has also specialized in sociology and systems theory at Bielefeld University under the direction of Niklas Luhmann. From 1998 to 2006 she was a Vice-President of Research Committee 51 on Sociocybernetics and Systems Theory at the International Sociological Association (ISA) and served as a President of the Research Committee 36 on Alienation theory and Research at the ISA between 2010 and 2018. Her current research interests include the sociology of peace, the sociology of knowledge, classical sociology, the theory of self-conscious emotions, and the theory of self. Recent publications include Jane Addams and the Spirit of Social Entrepreneurship (co-edited) (2018), “Jane Addams and the Birth of Micro Sociology as a Science and a Social Enterprise” (2018), “Guilt: What’s So Good about Feeling Bad about Yourself” (2018), and “Lost in Vicissitudes of Greatness and Decline: Charles Horton Cooley’s Unique Contribution to Sociology” (2018).en_GB
dc.referencesAddams, Jane. 1910. Twenty Years at Hull-House with Autobiographical Notes. New York: MacMillan.en_GB
dc.referencesAddams, Jane. 2002a [1910]. “The Snare of Preparation.” Pp. 100-113 in The Jane Addams Reader, edited by Jean Bethke Elshtain. New York: Basic Books.en_GB
dc.referencesAddams, Jane. 2002b [1881]. “Cassandra.” Pp. 10-13 in The Jane Addams Reader, edited by Jean Bethke Elshtain. New York: Basic Books.en_GB
dc.referencesAddams, Jane. 2002c [1893]. “The Subjective Necessity for a Social Settlement.” Pp. 14-28 in The Jane Addams Reader, edited by Jean Bethke Elshtain. New York: Basic Books.en_GB
dc.referencesAddams, Jane. 2002d [1893]. “The Objective Value of a Social Settlement.” Pp. 29-45 in The Jane Addams Reader, edited by Jean Bethke Elshtain. New York: Basic Books.en_GB
dc.referencesBaker, Keith M. 1989. “Closing the French Revolution: Saint-Simon and Comte.” Pp. 323-339 in The French Revolution and the Creation of Modern Political Culture: Vol. 3, The Transformation of Political Culture 1789-1848, edited by François Furet and Mona Ozouf. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesBryant, C. G. A. 1975. “Kuhn, Paradigms and Sociology.” British Journal of Sociology 26:354-359.en_GB
dc.referencesCalhoun, Craig. 2007. “Preface.” Pp. ix-xiv in Sociology in America: A History, edited by Craig Calhoun. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en_GB
dc.referencesClaeys, Gregory. 2005. “Early Socialism.” Pp. 184-191 in Encyclopedia of Nineteenth-Century Thought, edited by Gregory Claeys. London, New York: Routledge.en_GB
dc.referencesConnell, R. W. 1997. “Why Is Classical Theory Classical?” American Journal of Sociology 102(6):1511-1557.en_GB
dc.referencesCooley, Charles Horton. 1902. Human Nature and Social Order. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.en_GB
dc.referencesDeegan, Mary Jo. 2005. Jane Addams and the Men of the Chicago School, 1892-1920. New Brunswick, London: Transaction Publishers.en_GB
dc.referencesEckberg, Douglas Lee and Lester Hill, Jr. 1979. “The Paradigm Concept and Sociology: A Critical Review.” American Sociological Review 44(6):925-937.en_GB
dc.referencesElshtain, Jean Bethke. 2002. Jane Addams and the Dream of American Democracy. A Life. New York: BasicBooks.en_GB
dc.referencesFranklin, Donna L. 1986. “Mary Richmond and Jane Addams: From Moral Certainty to Rational Inquiry in Social Work Practice.” Social Service Review 60(4):504-525.en_GB
dc.referencesGouhier, Henri. 1933-1941. La Jeunesse d’Auguste Comte et la formation du positivisme, 3 volumes. Paris: Vrin.en_GB
dc.referencesHarvey, Lee. 1982. “The Use and Abuse of Kuhnian Paradigms in the Sociology of Knowledge.” Journal of the British Sociological Association 16(1):85-101.en_GB
dc.referencesKuhn, Thomas. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en_GB
dc.referencesLinn, James Weber. 1935. Jane Addams: A Biography. New York, London: D. Appleton-Century.en_GB
dc.referencesLong, Norman. 1990. “From Paradigm Lost to Paradise Regained? The Case for an Actor-Oriented Sociology of Development.” European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 49:3-24.en_GB
dc.referencesLubove, Roy. 1965. The Professional Altruist: The Emergence of Social Work as a Career 1880-1930. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesMisheva, Vessela. 2018. “Jane Addams and the Birth of Sociology as a Science and a Social Enterprise.” Pp. 219-274 in Jane Addams’ Sociology and the Spirit of Social Entrepreneurship, edited by Vessela Misheva and Andrew Blasko. Uppsala: Uppsala University, Studia Sociological Upsaliensia 65.en_GB
dc.referencesMisheva, Vessela. 2019. “Lost in Vicissitudes of Greatness and Decline: Charles Horton Cooley’s Unique Contribution to Sociology.” Pp. 37-73 in Updating Charles H. Cooley. Contemporary Perspectives on a Sociological Classic, edited by Natalia Ruiz-Junco and Baptiste Brossard. London: Routledge.en_GB
dc.referencesParsons, Talcott. 1968a. “Cooley and the Problem of Internalization.” Pp. 48-67 in Cooley and Sociological Analysis, edited by Albert J. Reiss. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.en_GB
dc.referencesParsons, Talcott. 1968b. “Introduction to the Paperback Edition.” Pp. v-xiv in Talcott Parsons, The Structure of Social Action, vol. II. New York: Free Press.en_GB
dc.referencesPickering, Mary. 1993. “Auguste Comte and the Saint-Simonians.” French Historical Studies 18(1):211-236.en_GB
dc.referencesRitzer, George. 1975. “Sociology: A Multiple Paradigm Science.” The American Sociologist 10(3):156-167.en_GB
dc.referencesSeigfried, Charlene Haddock. 2010. “Cultural Contradictions: Jane Addams’s Struggles with the Life of Art and the Art of Life.” Pp. 55-79 in Feminist Interpretations of Jane Addams, edited by Maurice Hamington. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesStebner, Eleanor J. 2010. “The Theology of Jane Addams: Religion Seeking Its Own Adjustment.” Pp. 201-222 in Feminist Interpretations of Jane Addams, edited by Maurice Hamington. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesTurner, Jonathan, Leonard Beeghley, and Charles H. Powers. 2007. The Emergence of Sociological Theory. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.en_GB
dc.referencesTurner, Stephen Park and Jonathan H. Turner. 1990. The Impossible Science. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorEmailVessela.Misheva@soc.uu.se
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-8077.15.2.14
dc.relation.volume15en_GB


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.