Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFine, Gary Alan
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-02T12:15:44Z
dc.date.available2019-07-02T12:15:44Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/29141
dc.description.abstractIn recent decades, sociologists have too often ignored the group level—the meso-level of analysis—in their emphasis on either the individual or the institution. This unfortunate absence misses much of what is central to a sociological analysis of community based on “action.” I draw upon Erving Goffman’s (1983) concept of the interaction order as I argue that a rigorous political sociology requires a focus on group cultures and tiny publics. Group dynamics, idiocultures, and interaction routines are central in creating social order. This approach to civic life draws from the pragmatism of John Dewey, as well as the broad tradition of symbolic interactionist theorists. Ultimately, I argue that a commitment to local action constitutes a commitment to a more extended social system.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesExpanding Social Interactionist Horizons: Bridging Disciplines and Approaches; 2
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.en_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en_GB
dc.subjectMeso-Level of Analysisen_GB
dc.subjectInteraction Orderen_GB
dc.subjectTiny Publicsen_GB
dc.subjectPolitical Orderen_GB
dc.titleThe Meso-World: Tiny Publics and Political Actionen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.page.number10-24
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationNorthwestern University, U.S.A.
dc.identifier.eissn1733-8077
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteGary Alan Fine is James E. Johnson Professor of Sociology at Northwestern University. His Ph.D. is in Social Psychology from Harvard University. He is the author of Tiny Publics: A Theory of Group Action and Culture. His current book project, under review, is The Hinge: Civil Society, Group Cultures, and Circuits of Action.en_GB
dc.referencesAnderson, Benedict O’G. 1991. Imagined Communities. London: Verso.en_GB
dc.referencesAnderson, Elizabeth. 2014. “Social Movements, Experiments in Living, and Moral Progress: Case Studies from Britain’s Abolition of Slavery.” Lindley Lecture, University of Kansas.en_GB
dc.referencesRetrieved March 04, 2015 (http://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/handle/1808/14787).en_GB
dc.referencesBack, Kurt and Donna Polisar. 1983. “Salons und Kaffeehäuser.” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 25:276-286.en_GB
dc.referencesBaiocchi, Gianpaolo et al. 2014. The Civic Imagination: Making a Difference in American Political Life. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.en_GB
dc.referencesBellah, Robert N. et al. 1991. The Good Society. New York: Knopf.en_GB
dc.referencesBlee, Kathleen. 2012. Democracy in the Making: How Activist Groups Form. New York: Oxford University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesBurke, Edmund. 1790. Reflections on the Revolution in France. London: J. Dodsley.en_GB
dc.referencesCohen, Jean and Andrew Arato. 1992. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.en_GB
dc.referencesCollins, Randall. 1981. “On the Microfoundations of Macrosociology.” American Journal of Sociology 86(5):984-1014.en_GB
dc.referencesDawson, Michael. 1995. Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesDewey, John. 1954. The Public and Its Problems. Chicago: Swallow Press.en_GB
dc.referencesDuck, Waverly. 2015. No Way Out: Precarious Living in the Shadow of Poverty and Drug Dealing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en_GB
dc.referencesEhrenberg, John. 1999. Civil Society: The Critical History of an Idea. New York: New York University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesEliasoph, Nina. 2012. Making Volunteers: Civic Life after Welfare’s End. Princeton: Princeton University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesFeigenbaum, Kenneth. 1959. “Sociable Groups as Pre-Political Behavior.” American Behavioral Scientist 2(3):29-31.en_GB
dc.referencesFine, Gary Alan. 1987. With the Boys: Little League Baseball and Preadolescent Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en_GB
dc.referencesFine, Gary Alan. 2007. Authors of the Storm: Meteorology and the Culture of Prediction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en_GB
dc.referencesFine, Gary Alan. 2012. Tiny Publics: A Theory of Group Culture and Group Action. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.en_GB
dc.referencesFine, Gary Alan. 2014. “The Hinge: Civil Society, Group Culture, and the Interaction Order.” Social Psychology Quarterly 77(1):5-26.en_GB
dc.referencesFine, Gary Alan and Brooke Harrington. 2004. “Tiny Publics: Small Groups and Civil Society.” Sociological Theory 22(3):341-356.en_GB
dc.referencesGiddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.en_GB
dc.referencesGoffman, Erving. 1961. Asylums. Garden City, NY: Anchor.en_GB
dc.referencesGoffman, Erving. 1983. “The Interaction Order.” American Sociological Review 48(1):1-17.en_GB
dc.referencesGoldfarb, Jeffrey. 2006. The Politics of Small Things: The Power of the Powerless in Dark Times. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en_GB
dc.referencesHallett, Tim. 2010. “The Myth Incarnate: Recoupling Processes, Turmoil, and Inhabited Institutions in an Urban Elementary School.” American Sociological Review 75(1):52-74.en_GB
dc.referencesHallett, Tim and Marc Ventresca. 2006. “Inhabited Institutions: Social Interaction and Organizational Forms in Gouldner’s Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy.” Theory and Society 35:213-236.en_GB
dc.referencesHobbes, Thomas. 1651. Leviathan. Oxford: Clarendon Press.en_GB
dc.referencesHomans, George. 1946. “The Small Warship.” American Sociological Review 11(3):294-300.en_GB
dc.referencesKjølsrød, Lise. 2013. “Mediated Activism: Contingent Democracy in Leisure Worlds.” Sociology 46(6):1207-1223.en_GB
dc.referencesLichterman, Paul and Nina Eliasoph. 2014. “Civic Action.” American Journal of Sociology 120(3):798-863.en_GB
dc.referencesMaines, David. 1977. “Social Organization and Social Structure in Symbolic Interactionist Thought.” Annual Review of Sociology 3:235-259.en_GB
dc.referencesMansbridge, Jane. 1980. Beyond Adversary Democracy. New York: Basic Books.en_GB
dc.referencesMcPherson, Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and Matthew Brashears. 2006. “Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades.” American Sociological Review 71(3):353-375.en_GB
dc.referencesMerton, Robert and Elinor Barber. 2004. The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity: A Study in Sociological Semantics and the Sociology of Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesMisztal, Barbara. 2001. “Normality and Trust in Goffman’s Theory of Interaction Order.” Sociological Theory 19(3):312-224.en_GB
dc.referencesOlick, Jeffrey and Joyce Robbins. 1998. “Social Memory Studies: From ‘Collective Memory’ to the Historical Sociology of Mnemonic Practices.” Annual Review of Sociology 24: 105-140.en_GB
dc.referencesParsons, Talcott and Edward Shils. 1951. Toward a General Theory of Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesRawls, Anne. 1987. “Interaction Sui Generis.” Sociological Theory 5:136-149.en_GB
dc.referencesSampson, Robert, J. 2012. Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en_GB
dc.referencesSchütz, Alfred. 1967. The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesSennett, Richard. 1977. The Fall of Public Man. New York: Knopf.en_GB
dc.referencesSennett, Richard. 2012. Together: The Rituals, Pleasures, and Politics of Cooperation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesSherif, Muzafer et al. 1961. Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Book Exchange.en_GB
dc.referencesSilver, Daniel, Terry Nichols Clark, and Clemente Jesus Navarro Yanez. 2010. “Scenes: Social Context in an Age of Contingency.” Social Forces 88(5):2293-2324.en_GB
dc.referencesSimmel, George. 1971. On Individuality and Social Forms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en_GB
dc.referencesStrauss, Anselm. 1978. Negotiations: Varieties, Contexts, Processes and Social Order. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.en_GB
dc.referencesSwidler, Ann. 1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review 51(2):273-286.en_GB
dc.referencesTavory, Iddo and Nina Eliasoph. 2013. “Coordinating Futures: Toward a Theory of Anticipation.” American Journal of Sociology 118(4):908-942.en_GB
dc.referencesTönnies, Ferdinand. 2001. Community and Civil Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesTurner, Jonathan. 2012. Theoretical Principles of Sociology. Volume Three: Mesodynamics. New York: Springer.en_GB
dc.referencesVargas, Robert. 2016. Wounded City: Violent Turf Wars in a Chicago Barrio. New York: Oxford University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesWalzer, Michael. 1992. “The Civil Society Argument.” Pp. 89-107 in Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship, Community, edited by Chantal Mouffe. London: Verso.en_GB
dc.referencesWeber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.en_GB
dc.referencesWeeks, John. 2004. Unpopular Culture: The Ritual of Complaint in a British Bank. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en_GB
dc.referencesZerubavel, Eviatar. 1997. Social Mindscapes: An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorEmailg-fine@northwestern.edu
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-8077.15.2.02
dc.relation.volume15en_GB


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.