Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorAlberti, Carla
dc.contributor.authorJenne, Nicole
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-19T08:43:48Z
dc.date.available2019-08-19T08:43:48Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/29951
dc.description.abstractThis article deals with fieldwork in challenging research contexts that make preparation for field research particularly difficult. Challenging contexts include generally insecure places, politicized contexts, and unknown settings. Drawing on our experience in the field, we discuss four challenges that are common across these contexts: access, positionality, researcher well-being, and research design and data collection. Bringing together insights from fieldwork with urban elites and in the countryside, this paper describes problems that occurred in both settings and identifies a set of interpersonal skills that helped the authors to tackle the challenges of the field and seize the opportunities it offered. This article posits that recognizing the importance of certain interpersonal skills, namely: openness, empathy, humility, and flexibility, precedes the identification of practical tools. Interpersonal skills, instead, focus on a general attitude that underlies researchers’ capacity to make informed choices about specific courses of actions, preparing fieldworkers to be prepared to confront problems once they arise.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesQualitative Sociology Review; 3
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.en_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en_GB
dc.subjectFieldworken_GB
dc.subjectResearch Strategyen_GB
dc.subjectChallenging Contextsen_GB
dc.subjectQualitative Researchen_GB
dc.titleGetting Prepared to Be Prepared: How Interpersonal Skills Aid Fieldwork in Challenging Contextsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.page.number42-62
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationPontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Chile
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationPontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Chile
dc.identifier.eissn1733-8077
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteCarla Alberti is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the Instituto de Ciencia Política, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, and Junior Researcher at the IMFD, Chile. She holds a PhD in Political Science from Brown University. Her research interests include indige­nous politics, Latin American politics, party-movements, and illegal markets.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteNicole Jenne is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, and an associate researcher at the Centre for International Studies (CEIUC) of the same university. She holds a PhD in Political Science from the European University Institute in Florence, Italy. Her research interests are in the areas of International Relations and international security, especially regional security in Latin America and the Asia Pacific.en_GB
dc.referencesBarakat, Sultan et al. 2002. “The Composite Approach: Research Design in the Context of War and Armed Conflict.” Third World Quarterly 23(5):991-1003.en_GB
dc.referencesBelousov, Konstantin et al. 2007. “Any Port in a Storm: Fieldwork Difficulties in Dangerous and Crisis-Ridden Settings.” Qualitative Research 7(2):155-175.en_GB
dc.referencesCammett, Melani. 2006. “Political Ethnography in Deeply Divided Societies.” Qualitative Methods 4(2):15-18.en_GB
dc.referencesChiswell, Hannah M. and Rebecca Wheeler. 2016. “‘As Long as You’re Easy on the Eye’: Reflecting on Issues of Positionality and Researcher Safety during Farmer Interviews.” Area 48(2):229-235.en_GB
dc.referencesFirebaugh, Glenn. 2008. Seven Rules for Social Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesGoode, J. Paul and Ariel I. Ahram. 2016. “Observing Autocracies from the Ground Floor.” Social Science Quarterly 97(4):823-833.en_GB
dc.referencesGoodhand, Jonathan. 2000. “Research in Conflict Zones: Ethics and Accountability.” Forced Migration Review 8:12-15.en_GB
dc.referencesHertel, Shareen, Matthew M. Singer, and Donna Lee Van Cott. 2009. “Field Research in Developing Countries: Hitting the Road Running.” PS: Political Science and Politics 42(2): 305-309.en_GB
dc.referencesHöglund, Kristine. 2011. “Comparative Field Research in War-Torn Societies.” Pp. 114-129 in Understanding Peace Research: Methods and Challenges, edited by K. Höglund and M. Öberg. London: Routledge.en_GB
dc.referencesJohnson, Janet Elise. 2009. “Unwilling Participant Observation among Russian Siloviki and the Good-Enough Field Researcher.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42(2):321-324.en_GB
dc.referencesKapiszewski, Diana, Lauren M. MacLean, and Benjamin L. Read. 2015. Field Research in Political Science: Practices and Principles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesKapoor, Ilan. 2004. “Hyper-Self-Reflexive Development? Spivak on Representing the Third World ‘Other.’” Third World Quarterly 25(4):627-647.en_GB
dc.referencesKlein, Cameron, Renée E. DeRouin, and Eduardo Salas. 2006. “Uncovering Workplace Interpersonal Skills: A Review, Framework, and Research Agenda.” Pp. 79-126 in International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, edited by G. P. Hodgkinson and J. K. Ford. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.en_GB
dc.referencesKrasznai Kovàcs, Eszter and Arshiya Bose. 2014. “Flirting with Boundaries: Ethical Dilemmas of Performing Gender and Sexuality in the Field.” Pp. 109-119 in Fieldwork in the Global South: Ethical Challenges and Dilemmas, edited by J. Lunn. New York: Routledge.en_GB
dc.referencesLunn, Jenny. 2014. Fieldwork in the Global South: Ethical Challenges and Dilemmas. New York: Routledge.en_GB
dc.referencesMcEnery, Jean M. and P. Nick Blanchard. 1999. “Validity of Multiple Ratings of Business Student Performance in a Management Simulation.” Human Resource Development Quarterly; Hoboken 10(2):155-172.en_GB
dc.referencesMcLean, Athena and Annette Leibing, eds. 2007. The Shadow Side of Fieldwork: Exploring the Blurred Borders between Ethnography and Life. Malden, MA: Blackwell.en_GB
dc.referencesMitchell, Wendy and Annie Irvine. 2008. “I’m Okay, You’re Okay?: Reflections on the Well-Being and Ethical Requirements of Researchers and Research Participants in Conducting Qualitative Fieldwork Interviews.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 7(4):31-44.en_GB
dc.referencesMoscuzza, Alessandro and Jenny Lunn. 2014. “Doing It Togeth-er: Ethical Dimensions of Accompanied Fieldwork.” Pp. 69-82 in Fieldwork in the Global South: Ethical Challenges and Dilemmas, edited by J. Lunn. New York: Routledge.en_GB
dc.referencesMukeredzi, Tabitha Grace. 2012. “Qualitative Data Gathering: Challenges in a Politically Unstable Rural Environment: A Zimbabwean Experience.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 11(1):1-11.en_GB
dc.referencesMügge, Liza M. 2013. “Sexually Harassed by Gatekeepers: Reflections on Fieldwork in Surinam and Turkey.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 16(6):541-546.en_GB
dc.referencesNilan, Pamela. 2002. “‘Dangerous’ Fieldwork Re-Examined: The Question of Researcher Subject Position.” Qualitative Research 2(3):363-386.en_GB
dc.referencesOrtbals, Candice D. and Meg E. Rincker. 2009. “Fieldwork, Identities, and Intersectionality: Negotiating Gender, Race, Class, Religion, Nationality, and Age in the Research Field Abroad.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42(2):287-290.en_GB
dc.referencesPalriwala, Rajni. 2005. “Fieldwork in a Post-Colonial Anthropology. Experience and the Comparative.” Social Anthropology 13(2):151-170.en_GB
dc.referencesRoman, Alexandru V. 2016. “Studying Corruption: Reflections on the Methodological, Practical, and Personal Challenges.” Qualitative Sociology Review 12(3):6-27.en_GB
dc.referencesRoss, Karen. 2001. “Political Elites and the Pragmatic Paradigm: Notes from a Feminist Researcher—In the Field and out to Lunch.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 4(2):155-166.en_GB
dc.referencesSharp, Gwen and Emily Kremer. 2006. “The Safety Dance: Confronting Harassment, Intimidation, and Violence in the Field.” Sociological Methodology 36(1):317-327.en_GB
dc.referencesSmith, Thomas A. 2014. “Unsettling the Ethical Interviewer: Emotions, Personality, Ethics and the Interview.” Pp. 145-157 in Fieldwork in the Global South: Ethical Challenges and Dilemmas, edited by J. Lunn. New York: Routledge.en_GB
dc.referencesSriram, Chandra Lekha et al., eds. 2009. Surviving Field Research: Working in Violent and Difficult Situations. London, New York: Routledge.en_GB
dc.referencesThomson, Susan, An Ansoms, and Judith Murison, eds. 2012. Emotional and Ethical Challenges for Field Research in Africa: The Story behind the Findings. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.en_GB
dc.referencesTownsend-Bell, Erica. 2009. “Being True and Being You: Race, Gender, Class, and the Fieldwork Experience.” PS: Political Science and Politics 42(2):311-314.en_GB
dc.referencesWong, Rebecca W. Y. 2015. “A Note on Fieldwork in ‘Dangerous’ Circumstances: Interviewing Illegal Tiger Skin Suppliers and Traders in Lhasa.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 18(6):695-702.en_GB
dc.referencesWood, Elisabeth Jean. 2006. “The Ethical Challenges of Field Research in Conflict Zones.” Qualitative Sociology 29(3):373-386.en_GB
dc.referencesZulauf, Monika. 1999. “Cross-National Qualitative Research: Accommodating Ideals and Reality.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2(2):159-169.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorEmailcaalbert@uc.cl
dc.contributor.authorEmailnjenne@uc.cl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-8077.15.3.03
dc.relation.volume15en_GB


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.