Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTorelli, Julian
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-19T08:43:49Z
dc.date.available2019-08-19T08:43:49Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/29952
dc.description.abstractQualitative field research can capture the life worlds and definitions of the situation of informants often not reported in quantitative studies. Post hoc reflections of how more seasoned researchers de­fine, assess, and interpret the process of entering the field and the interview dynamic between the researcher’s subjectivity and the subjectivity of informants are widespread in the qualitative research literature. However, seldom are the personal stories and reflections of neophyte researchers voiced in published accounts. This article accounts for my experiences in researching the “dirty work” of front­line caseworkers and the importance of practicing empathy while managing a boundary. I emphasize the practical sense-making challenges of managing a delicate balance between under and over rapport in researching homeless shelter caseworkers as an occupational group. My experiences underscore the challenging dynamics of maintaining a professionally oriented research-role, as well as the crucial importance of boundary work and distancing as practical strategies to qualitative interviewing.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesQualitative Sociology Review; 3
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.en_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en_GB
dc.subjectQualitative Researchen_GB
dc.subjectDirty Worken_GB
dc.subjectConstructivismen_GB
dc.subjectBoundary Worken_GB
dc.subjectCaseworken_GB
dc.subjectStigmaen_GB
dc.titleOn Entering the Field: Notes from a Neophyte Researcheren_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.page.number64-92
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationMcMaster University, Canada
dc.identifier.eissn1733-8077
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnote Julian Torelli is a doctoral student in the Department of Sociology at McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. His principal research interests lie in the sociology of work and occupations, social psychology, deviance, and social problems.en_GB
dc.referencesAdler, Patricia A. and Peter Adler. 1987. Membership Roles in Field Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.en_GB
dc.referencesAdler, Patricia and Peter Adler. 1991. “Stability and Flexibility: Maintaining Relations with Organized and Unorganized Groups.” Pp. 173-183 in Experiencing Fieldwork: An Inside View of Qualitative Research, edited by W. B. Shaffir and R. A. Stebbins. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.en_GB
dc.referencesAdler, Patricia A. and Peter Adler. 2012. “Keynote Address. Tales from the Field: Reflections on Four Decades of Ethnography.” Qualitative Sociology Review 8(1):10-32.en_GB
dc.referencesAnsell, Nicola and Lorraine Van Blerk. 2005. “Joining the Conspiracy? Negotiating Ethics and Emotions in Researching (around) AIDS in Southern Africa.” Ethics Place and Environment 8(1):61-82.en_GB
dc.referencesAtkinson, Paul and Martyn Hammersley. 1994. “Ethnography and Participant Observation.” Pp. 248-261 in Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln. Thou¬sand Oaks, CA: Sage.en_GB
dc.referencesBecker, Howard S. 1996. “The Epistemology of Qualitative Research.” Pp. 53-71 in Ethnography and Human Development: Context and Meaning in Social Inquiry, edited by R. Jessor, A. Colby, and R. A. Shweder. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en_GB
dc.referencesBourgois, Philippe. 2002. “Respect at Work: ‘Going Legit.’” Pp. 15-35 in Ethnographic Research: A Reader, edited by S. Taylor. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.en_GB
dc.referencesBrinkmann, Svend and Kvale Steinar. 2005. “Confronting the Ethics of Qualitative Research.” Journal of Constructivist Psychology 18:157-181.en_GB
dc.referencesCassell, Joan and Murray L. Wax. 1980. “Toward a Moral Science of Human Beings.” Social Problems 27:259-264.en_GB
dc.referencesCharmaz, Kathy. 1991. Good Days, Bad Days: The Self in Chronic Illness and Time. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesCharmaz, Kathy. 2003. “Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods.” Pp. 249-291 in Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.en_GB
dc.referencesCharmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Research. London: Sage.en_GB
dc.referencesCheek, Julianne, M. Onslow, and A. Cream. 2004. “Beyond the Divide: Comparing and Contrasting Aspects of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Approaches.” Advances in Speech-Language Pathology 6:147-152.en_GB
dc.referencesCiaffa, Jay A. 1998. Max Weber and the Problems of Value-Free Social Science: A Critical Examination of the Werturteilsstreit. Lewisburg, NJ: Bucknell University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesClingerman, Evelyn. 2006. “An Insider/Outsider Team Approach in Research with Migrant Farmworker Women.” Family and Community Health 30(18):75-84.en_GB
dc.referencesCorbin, Juliet and Janice M. Morse. 2003. “The Unstructured Interactive Interview: Issues of Reciprocity and Risks When Dealing with Sensitive Topics.” Qualitative Inquiry 9(3):335-354.en_GB
dc.referencesDenzin, Norman K. 1997. Interpretive Ethnography: Ethnographic Practices for the 21st Century. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.en_GB
dc.referencesDenzin, Norman K. 2001. “The Reflexive Interview and a Performative Social Science.” Qualitative Research 1(1):23-46.en_GB
dc.referencesDickson-Swift, Virginia et al. 2006. “Blurring Boundaries in Qualitative Health Research on Sensitive Topics.” Qualitative Health Research 16:85-8–87.en_GB
dc.referencesDickson-Swift, Virginia et al. 2007. “Doing Sensitive Research: What Challenges Do Qualitative Researchers Face?” Qualitative Research 7(3):327-353.en_GB
dc.referencesDouglas, Jack D. 1976. Investigative Social Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.en_GB
dc.referencesDuncombe, Jean and Julie Jessop. 2002. “‘Doing Rapport’ and the Ethics of ‘Faking Friendship.’” Pp. 107-122 in Ethics in Qualitative Research, edited by M. Mauthner et al. London: Sage.en_GB
dc.referencesEliaeson, Sven. 1990. “Influences on Max Weber’s Methodology.” Acta Sociologica 33(1):15-30.en_GB
dc.referencesEmerson, Robert M. and Melvin Pollner. 1976. “Dirty Work Designations: Their Features and Consequences in a Psychiatric Setting.” Social Problems 23(3):243-254.en_GB
dc.referencesEzzy, Douglas. 2010. “Qualitative Interviewing as an Embodied Emotional Performance.” Qualitative Inquiry 16(3):163-170.en_GB
dc.referencesFleisher, Marl. 1998. Dead End Kids: Girls Gangs and the Boys They Know. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.en_GB
dc.referencesGans, Herbert. 2003. “The Participant Observer as a Human Being: Observations on the Personal Aspects of Fieldwork.” Pp. 80-94 in Field Research: A Sourcebook and Field Manual, edited by R. G. Burgess. London: Routledge.en_GB
dc.referencesGilbert, Kathleen. 2001. “Introduction: Why Are We Interested in Emotions?” Pp. 3-15 in The Emotional Nature of Qualitative Research, edited by K. R. Gilbert. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.en_GB
dc.referencesGoode, Judith and Jeff Maskovsky. 2002. “The New Poverty Studies: The Ethnography of Power, Politics and Impoverished People in the United States.” Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 29(4):181-183.en_GB
dc.referencesGoodrum, Sarah and Jennifer L. Keys. 2007. “Reflections on Two Studies of Emotionally Sensitive Topics: Bereavement from Murder and Abortion.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 10(4):249-258.en_GB
dc.referencesGoffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.en_GB
dc.referencesGoffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.en_GB
dc.referencesGoffman, Erving. 2009. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon and Schuster.en_GB
dc.referencesGrills, Scott and Robert Prus. 2008. “The Myth of the Independent Variable: Reconceptualizing Class, Gender, Race, and Age as Subcultural Processes.” The American Sociologist 39(1):19-37.en_GB
dc.referencesHeap, James L. and Phillip A. Roth. 1973. “On Phenomenological Sociology.” American Sociological Review 38(3):354-367.en_GB
dc.referencesHochschild, Arlie R. 1979. “Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure.” American Journal of Sociology 85(3): 551-575.en_GB
dc.referencesHochschild, Arile R. 1990. “Ideology and Emotion Management: A Perspective and Path for Future Research.” Pp. 117-142 in Research Agendas in the Sociology of Emotions, edited by T. D. Kemper. New York: State University of New York Press.en_GB
dc.referencesHolland, Janet. 2007. “Emotions and Research.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 10(3):195-209.en_GB
dc.referencesHubbard, Gill, Kathryn Backett-Milburn, and Debbie Kemmer. 2001. “Working with Emotion: Issues for the Researcher in Fieldwork and Teamwork.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 4(2):119-137.en_GB
dc.referencesHughes, Everett C. 1962. “Good People and Dirty Work.” Social Problems 10(1):3-11.en_GB
dc.referencesHusserl, Edmund. 1970. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesHusserl, Edmund. 2013. Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.en_GB
dc.referencesJankowski, Martin. 1991. Islands in the Street: Gangs and American Urban Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.en_GB
dc.referencesKavanaugh, Karen and Lioness Ayres. 1998. “‘Not as Bad as it Could Have Been’: Assessing and Mitigating Harm During Research Interviews on Sensitive Topics.” Research in Nursing & Health 21(1):91-97.en_GB
dc.referencesKleinman, Sherryl and Martha Copp. 1993. Emotions and Field-work. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.en_GB
dc.referencesKubátová, Helena. 2018. “Research into Transformations in Everyday Life: Three Methodological Notes.” Qualitative Sociology Review 14(3):6-22.en_GB
dc.referencesLaverty, Susann M. 2003. “Hermeneutic Phenomenology and Phenomenology: A Comparison of Historical and Methodological Considerations.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2(3):21-35.en_GB
dc.referencesLincoln, Yvonna S. and Egon G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.en_GB
dc.referencesLipsky, Michael. 2010. Street-Level Bureaucracy, 30th ann. Ed.: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.en_GB
dc.referencesLupton, Deborah. 1994. Medicine as Culture: Illness, Disease and the Body in Western Societies. London: Sage.en_GB
dc.referencesMiller, S. M. 1952. “The Participant Observer and ‘Over-Rapport.’” American Sociological Review 17(1):97-99.en_GB
dc.referencesMitchell, Wendy and Annie Irvine. 2008. “I’m Okay, You’re Okay? Reflections on the Well-Being and Ethical Requirements of Researchers and Research Participants in Conducting Qualitative Fieldwork Interviews.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 7(4):31-44.en_GB
dc.referencesMurphy, Elizabeth and Robert Dingwall. 2001. “The Ethics of Ethnography.” Pp. 339-351 in Handbook of Ethnography, edited by P. Atkinson et al. London: Sage.en_GB
dc.referencesPerry, Catherine, Miranda Thurston, and Ken Green. 2004. “Involvement and Detachment in Researching Sexuality: Reflections on the Process of Semi Structured Interviewing.” Qualitative Health Research 14(1):135-148.en_GB
dc.referencesPhillips, Rachel et al. 2012. “Courtesy Stigma: A Hidden Health Concern among Front‐Line Service Providers to Sex Workers.” Sociology of Health & Illness 34(5):681-696.en_GB
dc.referencesPrus, Robert. 1996. Symbolic Interaction and Ethnographic Research: Intersubjectivity and the Study of Human Lived Experience. New York: Suny Press.en_GB
dc.referencesRock, Paul. 2001. “Symbolic Interactionism and Ethnography.” Pp. 26-38 in Handbook of Ethnography, edited by P. Atkinson et al. London: Sage Publications.en_GB
dc.referencesSanders, Clinton. 2010a. “Working Out Back: The Veterinary Technician and ‘Dirty Work.’” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography (39)3:243-272.en_GB
dc.referencesSanders, Clinton. 2010b. “Ethnography as Dangerous, Sad, and Dirty Work.” Pp. 101-124 in New Frontiers in Ethnography, edited by S. Hillyard and Ch. Pole. London: Emerald Group Publishing.en_GB
dc.referencesSchütz, Alfred. 1967. The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesSchütz, Alfred. 1970. On Phenomenology and Social Relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en_GB
dc.referencesShaffir, William. 1991. “Managing a Convincing Self-Presentation: Some Personal Aspects of Entering the Field.” Pp. 72- 83 in Experiencing Fieldwork: An Inside View of Qualitative Research, edited by R. A. Stebbins and W. Shaffir. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.en_GB
dc.referencesShaffir, William. 1999. “Doing Ethnography: Reflections on Finding Your Way.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 28(6):676-686.en_GB
dc.referencesShaffir, William and Dorohy Pawluch. 2003. “Occupations and Professions.” Pp. 893-913 in Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by L. T. Reynolds and N. J. Herman-Kinney. New York: AltaMira Press.en_GB
dc.referencesShaffir, William and Robert Stebbins, eds. 1991. Experiencing Fieldwork: An Inside View of Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.en_GB
dc.referencesShaffir, William, Robert Stebbins, and Allan Turowetz. 1980. Fieldwork Experience: Qualitative Approaches to Social Research. New York: St. Martin’s.en_GB
dc.referencesStanley, Liz and Sue Wise. 1983. Breaking Out: Feminist Consciousness and Feminist Research. London: Routledge.en_GB
dc.referencesSword, Wendy. 1999. “Accounting for Presence of Self: Reflections on Doing Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Health Research 9(2):270-278.en_GB
dc.referencesTaylor, Steven. 1991. “Leaving the Field: Research, Relationships, and Responsibilities.” Pp. 238-247 in Experiencing Fieldwork: An Inside View of Qualitative Research, edited by W. B. Shaffir and R. A. Stebbins. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.en_GB
dc.referencesTillmann-Healy, Lisa and Christine Kiesinger. 2001. “Mirrors: Seeing Each Other and Ourselves through Fieldwork.” Pp. 81-110 in The Emotional Nature of Qualitative Research, edited by K. Gilbert. Boca Raton, London, New York, Washington: CRC Press.en_GB
dc.referencesThompson, Anthiny S. 2002. “My Research Friend? My Friend the Researcher? My Friend, My Researcher? Mis-Informed Consent and People with Developmental Disabilities.” Pp. 95-106 in Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers, edited by W. C. Van den Hoonaard. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.en_GB
dc.referencesWatts, J. 2008. “Emotion, Empathy and Exit: Reflections on Doing Ethnographic Qualitative Research on Sensitive Topics.” Medical Sociology Online 3(2):3-14.en_GB
dc.referencesWeber, Max. 2017. Methodology of Social Sciences. New York: Routledge.en_GB
dc.referencesWolf, Daniel R. 1991. “High-Risk Methodology: Reflections on Leaving an Outlaw Society.” Pp. 211-223 in Experiencing Fieldwork: An Inside View of Qualitative Research, edited by W. B. Shaffir and R. A. Stebbins. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.en_GB
dc.referencesWojciechowska, Magdalena. 2018. “‘I’ll Tell You What You Need to Know.’ How Respondents Negotiate the Sense of Meaning-Making—Methodological Reflections from the Field Based on Ethnographic Study of Lesbian Parenting in Poland.” Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej (14)2:120-139.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorEmailtorellijulian@gmail.com
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-8077.15.3.04
dc.relation.volume15en_GB


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.