Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorKruszelnicki, Michał
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-15T11:11:10Z
dc.date.available2020-01-15T11:11:10Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1689-4286
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/31162
dc.description.abstractThe paper argues that F. Nietzsche’s magnum opus Thus Spoke Zarathustra can be looked upon as a narrative about the protagonist’s maturation to understand, articulate and accept the thought of the eternal return which is tantamount to accepting the prospect of his own imminent death and the enigma of afterlife. I seek to prove that Zarathustra purposely defers systematic and coherent explanation of his deepest thought, as well as he dismisses its interpretations proposed by his animals, disciples, and by his main enemy – the dwarf. The thought of the eternal return can only be revealed, enacted. For this purpose, Zarathustra must actually die and return and by so doing bestow on the next generations the gift of his secret intuition. It can be argued convincingly that the last two chapters of part IV of Thus Spoke Zarathustra are conceived as a powerful performative reenactment of the thought of the eternal return as a selective force. The force, however, which does not bring a different (resp. “better”, “stronger”…) existence, as Gilles Deleuze would want it, but the very same, identical life.pl_PL
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherInstytut Filozofii Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris;43
dc.subjectNietzschepl_PL
dc.subjectZarathustrapl_PL
dc.subjectdeathpl_PL
dc.subjectthe eternal return of the samepl_PL
dc.subjectinterpretationpl_PL
dc.subjectdifferencepl_PL
dc.subjectselectionpl_PL
dc.titleŚmierć i (wieczny) powrót Zaratustrypl_PL
dc.title.alternativeThe Death and the (Eternal) Return of Nietzsche’s Zarathustrapl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.rights.holder© Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny HYBRIS 2018pl_PL
dc.page.number1-15pl_PL
dc.referencesDeleuze G. (1994). Difference and Repetition, trans. Paul Patton. New York: Columbia University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesDeleuze N. (1993). Nietzsche i filozofia, przeł. B. Banasiak, Warszawa: Spacja.pl_PL
dc.referencesGooding-Williams R. (2001). Zarathustra’s Dionysian Modernism, Stanford: Stanford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesJung C.G. (2010). Zaratustra Nietzschego. Notatki z seminarium 1934-1939, t. I-II, wydał J. L. Jarrett, przeł. R. Reszke, Warszawa: KR.pl_PL
dc.referencesLoeb P. S. (2010). The Death of Nietzsche’s Zarathustra, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLöwith K. (1979). Nietzsche’s Philosophy of the Eternal Recurrence of the Same, trans. J. H. Lomax, Berkeley: University of California Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesNietzsche F., (1986), Sämtliche Briefe. Kritische Studienausgabe in 8 Bänden, hg. von G. Colli und M. Montinari (KSB), Berlin-New York, Band 6.pl_PL
dc.referencesNietzsche F. (1967), Sämtliche Werke. Kritische Studienausgabe in 15 Bänden, hg. von G. Colli und M. Montinari (KSA), Berlin-New York: Verlag Walter de Gruyter, Band 4, 11.pl_PL
dc.referencesNietzsche F. (1999), To rzekł Zaratustra, przeł. S. Lisiecka i Z. Jaskuła, Warszawa: PIW.pl_PL
dc.referencesNietzsche F. (1905), Tako rzecze Zaratustra, przeł. W. Berent, Warszawa: Wyd. Jakuba Mortkowicza.pl_PL
dc.referencesPieniążek P. (1988). Problem wiecznego powrotu w filozofii Fryderyka Nietzschego, „Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Philosophica”, nr 5, ss. 179-201.pl_PL
dc.relation.volume4pl_PL
dc.disciplinefilozofiapl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord