Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDudek, Michał
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-22T09:48:44Z
dc.date.available2021-02-22T09:48:44Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1689-4286
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/33776
dc.description.abstractThis article focuses on political accelerationism—an idea that proposes to use capitalism against itself either by making it as a whole go even faster, pushing it to its limits and beyond until it collapses, or by appropriating some of its elements or tendencies for alternative, emancipatory purposes. It analyses two significant versions of this idea—that of Benjamin Noys and that of Nick Srnicek and Alex Williams—from the perspective of the following question: Is political accelerationism similar to certain previous developments in left critical thought in that it offers a new approach to law or, if it does not contain any explicitly expressed original take on law, enables a novel and fresh conceptualisation of law to be drawn from it? The article concludes that so far political accelerationism does not offer an original approach to law and that any perspectives on law that can be drawn from this idea are reminiscent of basic Marxist approaches to law.pl_PL
dc.description.abstractNiniejszy artykuł skupia się na politycznym akceleracjonizmie—idei proponującej by użyć kapitalizm przeciwko niemu samemu, albo przez przyspieszenie go jako pewnej całości, popchnięcie go do jego granic, a nawet jeszcze dalej aż upadnie, albo przez przejmowanie niektórych jego elementów bądź tendencji na rzecz realizacji alternatywnych, emancypacyjnych celów. Analizuje się tu dwie istotne wersje tej idei— Benjamina Noysa oraz Nicka Srniceka i Alexa Williamsa—z perspektywy następującego pytania: Czy polityczny akceleracjonizm jest podobny do niektórych wcześniejszych osiągnięć lewicowej myśli krytycznej, w tym sensie, że oferuje nowe podejście do prawa, albo, jeśli nie zawiera jakiegokolwiek jasno wyrażonego oryginalnego ujęcia prawa, umożliwia zrekonstruowanie na swojej podstawie nowatorskiej i świeżej konceptualizacji prawa? Zgodnie z konkluzją artykułu, na razie polityczny akceleracjonizm nie oferuje oryginalnego podejścia do prawa, a perspektywy na prawo możliwe do zrekonstuowania na jego podstawie przypominają podstawowe marksistowskie ujęcia prawa.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherUniwersytet Łódzkipl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris ;41
dc.subjectpolitical accelerationismpl_PL
dc.subjectBenjamin Noyspl_PL
dc.subjectNick Srnicekpl_PL
dc.subjectAlex Williamspl_PL
dc.subjectlawpl_PL
dc.subjectcritical theorypl_PL
dc.subjectMarxismpl_PL
dc.subjectpolityczny akceleracjonizmpl_PL
dc.subjectprawopl_PL
dc.subjectteoria krytycznapl_PL
dc.subjectmarksizmpl_PL
dc.titleNihil novi sub sole: law from the perspective of political accelerationismpl_PL
dc.title.alternativeNihil novi sub sole: prawo z perspektywy politycznego akceleracjonizmupl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number1-19pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationJagiellonian University in Krakowpl_PL
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteMichał Dudek – PhD in Law, works at the Department of Sociology of Law, Faculty of Law and Administration, Jagiellonian University in Krakow. Author of monograph Komunikowanie prawa w dobie pluralizmu kulturowego [The Communication of Law in the Age of Cultural Pluralism] (NOMOS, Kraków, 2014) and various publications on the influence of multiculturalism on law-making and lawapplying, legal policy, axiology of law, visuality and law and application of selected threads from contemporary philosophy of technology and science & technology studies to sociology of law.pl_PL
dc.referencesDerrida, J. (1992). Force of Law: The “Mystical Foundation of Authority”. In D. Cornell, M. Rosenfeld, D. G. Carlson (eds.), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice (3–67). New York and London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesLand, N. (2014). Teleoplexy: Notes on Acceleration. In R. Mackay, A. Avanessian (eds.), #Accelerate#: The Accelerationist Reader (509–520). Falmouth and Berlin: Urbanomic and Merve.pl_PL
dc.referencesLefebvre, A. (2008). The Image of Law: Deleuze, Bergson, Spinoza. Stanford: Stanford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMackay, R., Avanessian, A. (eds.) (2014). #Accelerate#: The Accelerationist Reader. Falmouth and Berlin: Urbanomic and Merve.pl_PL
dc.referencesMackay, R., Avanessian, A. (2014). Introduction. In R. Mackay, A. Avanessian (eds.), #Accelerate#: The Accelerationist Reader (1–47). Falmouth and Berlin: Urbanomic and Mervepl_PL
dc.referencesMarx, K. (1977). Preface. In K. Marx, A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. With some notes by R. Rojas. Moscow: Progress Publishers. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1859/critique-poleconomy/preface.htm, accessed 16 June 2017.pl_PL
dc.referencesMurray, J. (2013). Deleuze & Guattari: Emergent Law. Abingdon: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesMussawir, E. (2011). Jurisdiction in Deleuze: The Expression and Representation of Law. Abingdon: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesNegri, A. (2014). Some Reflections on the #Accelerate Manifesto. Trans. M. Pasquinelli. In R. Mackay, A. Avanessian (eds.), #Accelerate#: The Accelerationist Reader (363–378). Falmouth and Berlin: Urbanomic and Merve.pl_PL
dc.referencesNoys, B. (2010). The Persistence of the Negative: A Critique of Contemporary Continental Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesNoys, B. (2014). Malign Velocities. Accelerationism and Capitalism. Winchester and Washington: Zero Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesPashukanis, E. B. (2003). The General Theory of Law & Marxism. Trans. B. Einhorn. With a new introduction by D. Milovanovic. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.pl_PL
dc.referencesPower, N. (2015). Decapitalism, Left Scarcity, and the State. Fillip, 20, Fall. http://fillip.ca/content/decapitalism-left-scarcity-and-the-state, accessed 16 June 2017.pl_PL
dc.referencesReed, P. (2014). Reorientate, Eccentricate, Speculate, Fictionalize, Geometricize, Commonize, Abstractify: Seven Prescriptions for Accelerationism. In R. Mackay, A. Avanessian (eds.), #Accelerate#: The Accelerationist Reader (521–536). Falmouth and Berlin: Urbanomic and Merve.pl_PL
dc.referencesRenner, K. (2010). The Institutions of Private Law and Their Social Functions. Trans. A. Schwarzschild. With a new introduction by A. J. Treviño. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.pl_PL
dc.referencesShaviro, S. (2010). Post Cinematic Affect. Winchester and Washington: Zero Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesSrnicek, N., Williams, A. (2016). Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World Without Work. Revised and Updated Edition. London and New York: Verso.pl_PL
dc.referencesTreviño, A. J. (2010). The Sociology of Law: Classical and Contemporary Perspectives. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.pl_PL
dc.referencesWilliams, A., Srnicek, N. (2014). #Accelerate: Manifesto for an Accelerationist Politics. In R. Mackay, A. Avanessian (eds.), #Accelerate#: The Accelerationist Reader (347–362). Falmouth and Berlin: Urbanomic and Merve.pl_PL
dc.relation.volume2pl_PL
dc.disciplinefilozofiapl_PL


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record